NoTwatterBlue_MrP

I see you

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

A French woman tells one of the second and third-generation migrant rioter no to vandalize her city

He responds by trying to set her face on fire

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@TimcastNews @TheQuartering Is Tim gonna ask him about his renfare behavior?

[Jason Fyk @JasonFyk]

🚨🚨🚨 VINDICATED 🚨🚨🚨

For eight years, I have argued one simple thing:

Facebook was never given “immunity” from being sued.

But that is exactly how my case was killed.

Facebook told the court Section 230 gave it immunity from the lawsuit itself, not just a defense to my claims. They did not have to prove good faith, prove they acted lawfully, or really prove anything.

The court adopted that argument almost verbatim and threw my case out with prejudice before discovery, amendment, or any real examination of what Facebook actually did. Essentially, I was not allowed to sue them because of Section 230 “immunity.”

In every filing I kept saying: that is not what the law says.

Eventually I was told I was entitled to my “opinion,” the issue was “definitively decided,” that I was “perpetually relitigating” it, and my lawyer was even warned about continuing to press it or face sanctions.

Except there was a YUGE problem:

Nobody had ever actually decided whether the law provides "immunity from suit."

I told the Ninth Circuit exactly that in March 2025. I did not simply tell them they were wrong. I told them they had never actually considered the immunity question. My motion was denied.

Then, seventeen months later, California v. Meta happened.

Meta again argued that Section 230 had repeatedly been treated as immunity from suit and therefore immunity should be “implied.” In other words, repetition had become the substitute for actually deciding what the law says. That's crazy.

However, this time the Ninth Circuit actually examined the question. They finally did their job.

It admitted its earlier use of “immunity” had been “somewhat loose,” said cases are not precedent for things merely "assumed," and then held:

Section 230 is a defense to liability, NOT immunity from suit.

That is the exact distinction I have been fighting over for eight years.

So yeah, I was right, that is vindication.

The courts have long treated immunity as settled simply through repetition. Have you ever been told this is already settled? It wasn't.

The Ninth Circuit just said that prior usage was not binding because the question had never actually been formally considered, Congress knows how to create immunity when it wants to, and Congress did not do that here.

So after eight years of being told this was long settled, I was proven correct on both points: it had never been settled, and when the Ninth Circuit finally settled it, the answer was the one I had been arguing all along. There is no immunity.

Now, this does not mean I have already won my underlying case.

It means the legal premise used to stop me from ever getting my case heard has now been completely rejected by the appellate court that controls my case. In plain English: the immunity used to kill my case never existed so my dismissal is not based on law.

The question now is whether the courts have the integrity to acknowledge what happened and reopen a case that resulted in a grave miscarriage of justice. I got screwed.

We shall see.

But this is much bigger than me.

Big Tech’s harms are not limited to allegedly addicting kids to social media.

Their business models give them enormous punlisher control over businesses, audiences, advertising, visibility, money and livelihoods.

If a platform uses that power unlawfully, the question should be whether what it did was legal.

The answer cannot simply be:

“Section 230. We’re immune. Case over.”

That world just ended!

I do not expect miracles from the District Court. They have already shown they will not follow controlling law.

But if it refuses to fix this, the appeal goes right back to the Ninth Circuit.

And this time the Ninth Circuit has already answered the question:

Section 230 is a defense. It is not immunity from suit.

Eight years later, the law finally says what I have been saying all along.

There is no Big Tech immunity!

[Ramin Ekhtiar @raminrealtalk]

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT JUST PUT THIS ON NATIONAL TELEVISION DURING THE NFL GAMES.

“This is the final battle with you at my side.
We will demolish the deep state.
We will expel the warmongers from our government.
We will drive out the globalists.
We will cast out the communists, Marxists, and fascists.
We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country.
We will rout the fake news media,
and we will liberate America from these villains once and for all.”

PAID FOR BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.

Not a campaign.
Not a PAC.
The actual United States government.

They’re not working us over anymore.
We’re working them over.

This is the final battle.
And it’s live on national TV.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@_MAGA_NEWS_ Did the cardboard cut out tell him that?

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@HormuzLetter Lmaoooo. Clearly they thought the RGB spaceship was for kicks.

[Info Battle Maiden @info_maiden]

It’s not just White people.

Mexican cleaning ladies don’t want to deal with them either.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@Jordan_Sather_ Mitch.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@Breaking911 But I thought this never happened?? That's what Democrats told me.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@Breaking911 No one looks like they know what to do including the emergency crews. These places are nothing but a zoo. It's sad. Probably fully preventable as well.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@bennyjohnson Dude was clearly trying to not be seen.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@CAMELCASTOff They were never "Reasonable"; it was simply the perception.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@KimKatieUSA A strong message needs to be sent. This needs to be a regular practice.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@IranIntl_En CIA has had heart attack guns for decades...js.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@__0HOUR1_ Damn right.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

XBOX CEO Asha Sharma says that gamers want physical media, so they are announcing when you purchase a game you get both

They are keeping physical discs, and when you buy one it will come with a digital entitlement

How it will work:

- Put the disc in an Xbox that has a disc drive
- Launch the game
- Claim a digital license on your Xbox account
- After that, you can play the game without putting the disc in, the disk will still work like a normal game disk

The digital license is tied to that specific disc, not permanently locked to you forever

If you sell or give the disc away and the new owner inserts it and claims it, the digital license moves to their account and comes off yours

This is the way it would be. Getting both physical media and digital media that you can own and sell

Launch is with 1,000 games and more coming later

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: Health Sec. Bobby Kennedy MIC DROPS the ENTIRE Fake News fearmonger apparatus

"In 10 years, there have been THREE measles deaths in America."

"There are now about 1.2 MILLION deaths every year from food-induced illness!"

"The media and certain demagogic politicians are constantly trying to SCARE us about infectious disease."

"And we take the attention away from the chronic disease that is being caused by powerful entities, by big food companies, by big pharmaceutical companies!"

"And what I'm trying to do as HHS Secretary, one deal with the infectious disease outbreaks, which we're doing, but also redirect attention and resources to the thing that's really killing Americans, which are food-borne diseases."

🔥🔥🔥

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@nicksortor @AliBradleyTV Oh well LoL

[Children’s Health Defense @ChildrensHD]

🚨 HHS IS ASKING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON VACCINE SAFETY AND THEY NEED TO HEAR FROM YOU.

The federal Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines is being activated and HHS is now asking the American people to weigh in as it conducts its assessment.

Attorney Ray Flores, whose lawsuit forced HHS to reestablish the task force last year, joined CHD’s Michael Kane to explain why this is such an important opportunity.

The public can submit comments addressing vaccine safety, the childhood vaccine schedule, medical and religious exemptions, and parental rights in vaccination decisions.

This is the call to action: Submit a comment and make your voice part of the official federal record. Then share the link with other parents, families and advocates.

📣 Comments are open through September 20.

CHD wants to see tens of thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of Americans participate. This is our opportunity to tell HHS directly what needs to change.

[NoTwatterBlue_MrP @Pcalderaz]

@Asmongold @EndWokeness