@johnmcdonnellMP So I’m not sure what you mean by this? Do you mean that people who commit serious crimes for political reasons should get less than those that do it for fun? Or for money?
It’s unfortunate that this statement from the Bar Council mentions a barrister’s duty to represent a client fearlessly but not a barrister’s duty to uphold the rule of law. The judge in this case had expressly directed that counsel were not to tell the jury that they were free to disregard his directions of law. The barrister allegedly - and at this stage this is just an allegation - did exactly what the judge had ruled that he must not do. All the Court of Appeal has done is to hold that the procedure the judge adopted to deal with this possible contempt was wrong. It has returned the matter to the judge for him to take forward under the correct procedure, if he sees fit. It is hardly appropriate for the Bar Council to be pronouncing at this stage that the matter should be at an end.
The predictable absurdity of our Trump Derangement Syndrome media… the worst regime on the planet teetering… Sky (actually far worse than BBC to my surprise)… it’s all about anxiety in Dubai apparently…
@WilliamJHague You didn’t set out the arguments *for*. The only positive argument you set out was that it will stop illegal immigrants accessing legitimate services… that is shutting the stable door…
@AdamWagner1 People missed flights, which placed the taxi driver at risk as he can become volatile without his medication.
“An individual suffering from aggressive cancer missed an appointment as a cancer patient and had to wait another two months for another appointment.”
@AdamWagner1 It was a plan which was carried out. Read sentencing remarks-
“People missed flights, people missed funerals, students were delayed for their mock exam,” said the judge. “A child with special needs on his way to school missed part of the school day and [missed] his medication …
@SpinningHugo Well that is a different issue. Anyway in practice the reasons are obvious. The prosecution have presented a strong case. In acquittals … well who knows but how would having reasons help?
@SpinningHugo So Hugo I share some of your concerns about the jury system. They acquit far too often- especially in sexual allegations. However it would not shorten trials to have a judge alone because he would have to hear the same evidence. At best you save some jury retirement time but…