The last time I saw a chart like $PATH it was $PLTR
Past performance is not indicative of future returns, but a lot of similarities.
Hitting GAAP profitability, chart at lows, cyclical AI beneficiary, growing.
If...
- you are young and do not know what to with your life
- have spend way too much time behind a screen
- have a son or daughter that dropped out of university, or is lost in life, or just lazy and unproductive, or needs a different experience
- if you feel like doing something different
Can strongly recommend the websites:
- https://t.co/NXtKa9Rg9M
- https://t.co/CeZaSxnD12 : world wide opportunities on organic farms
- https://t.co/baFmUDvkQt
Good websites to find volunteering opportunities at farms, eco-places, boats, etc. Personally did this long time ago and i would not have learned about forest gardens and permaculture without it. Staid at amazing places that taught me a lot. Also taught me how to garden, work with my hands, all kind of gardening/farming skills
Usually one works a couple of hours a day in exchange for food and lodging. I know people that traveled the whole world basically free with this, and having amazing experiences, volunteering on boats between continents and staying at farms and other places all over the world
Have canceled my team subscription for Claude Pro.
Idc how good that model is, it’s not good enough for me to support people who actively stifle innovation and gate keep knowledge that they didn’t even create.
The amount of genuinely stupid people I’ve met who’ve gone to these schools is actually radicalizing lol.
The thing about China is their best people are genuinely their best people.
America’s best people are often just the most privileged.
All empires end due to internal rot
Elite feeder schools dominate Ivy League admissions and have long served as the primary pipeline for both old money and new money students. These are the institutions where America’s most elite families send their children to prepare for their future roles in society — far beyond mere education.
Roughly 20 high schools consistently send more students to Ivy League colleges than most others combined.
America’s wealthiest families have long funneled their children into these schools, many of which have been reliable Ivy League feeders since the 1600s and 1700s.
I went to one of these schools, and literally know probably ~250+ people who attended one of them.
My wife went to a bay area public school that was pretty good but absolutely not a feeder. Suburban, high Asian population (largely first generation - country music, bud light, football and high SAT scores. No accents). Solid upper-middle class environment.
Her HS class sent ~10/400 to an ivy or equivalent like Stanford/MIT (applying a strict standard to equivalent - eg not even including Duke, Berkeley, JHU, other extremely good schools). My HS sent at least 50%. Not a typo.
I would say that her friends from high school are *significantly* smarter in average than the many hundreds that I know from these feeder schools. "Oh they aren't as well-rounded, that's why they didn't get in." This is totally false. They're more well-rounded, have more interesting hobbies, have wilder stories from college. They also work harder and are more ambitious - unclear if that's innate, or because they simply had to. They have better careers despite starting from behind.
I didn't have a strong opinion on all of this until I spent time with my wife and heard the stories, eg kids with perfect SAT scores getting rejected from 8 Ivys + Stanford. You hear that story and assume the guy is a total weirdo who pooped himself in front of the admissions team. Then you meet him and he's funny, cool, totally normal, interesting hobbies, lots of friends. It's radicalizing.
The skew of the Ivy admissions system is a straight up injustice and is bad for our nation, because we're filling so many of our most important launching pads with nepo babies.
Ireland never colonised any other country.we never exploited any other countries resources,we have dug ourselves out of 800 years of oppressive English rule,why in gods name should we have to jeopardise our own millenia old culture to solve gross over population in africa& Asia
Every beheading on Western soil is a provocative act of raw subjugation and thus, a declaration of war.
To sever a head is a kind of psychological conquest, a deliberate humiliation designed to break the spirit of the host population, broadcast supremacy, and signal that the old rules no longer apply.
The left-leaning politicians and journalists say “don’t be divisive.” But what’s divisive is the blade that divided a head from a body, turning a human being into a trophy, a warning, and a desecrated symbol of a defeated civilization.
This is siege warfare by other means.
“We are here. We own this ground now. Submit or bleed.”
Beheadings declare total enmity and total dominance. They reject you and your way of life, your decency and your proud history, and replace them with medieval spectacle and religious terror.
After Lee Rigby (and Samuel Paty), the hammer should have fallen in the form of mass deportations, borders enforced, and zero tolerance for crime and third world behaviors.
Instead, Tories and Labour chose surrender. They opened the gates even wider, gaslit their own people, and let the siege deepen.
Enough.
87% of people in China identify as pro-AI. In the U.S. it's 46%.
The gap is mostly mindset. Organizations pulling ahead treat AI as a team skill to build, not a threat to manage.
The tools are available to everyone. Most teams just won't commit to learning them.
I've come across posts like this many, many times – praising China's safety while denouncing democracies that spend too much time debating "freedoms."
I get it. I don't want to live somewhere I have to watch my surroundings constantly.
But safety isn't the price you pay for freedom. Taiwan, Japan, and Korea are among the safest places. You can walk the streets at 2 a.m without a second thought, and none of them required a surveillance state to get there. Culture, state capacity, and enforcement all shape this, no single model owns it.
China's version comes down to a tyrannical policing and surveillance apparatus that makes the personal cost of committing even petty crime extraordinarily high. But that same apparatus is also the one that disappears the lawyer, the journalist, the dissident.
Europe may have a problem, but China is not the answer to it. Hinting that the problem is having too much “freedom debate” is such a bad take.
@PAstynome A lot of them love China and are proud of being ethnic Chinese, while identifying strictly with the nationality of their new adoptive country
Thank you @RepThomasMassie!! you gave the dead of the USS Liberty a voice. You stood up for us when nobody had the courage. You’re a beacon of hope for our movement and our country
If you live in a country that sends poor people to jail for using drugs, but doesn't send rich people to jail for raping kids, you live in a shit hole country.