Percentagesign

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@all4lvoe12 @EricLDaugh Dropping out in 2024 = forfeit: it’s a loss

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@ofootball__ Yes, Canada is a woke liberal sissy man country

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@Debapriyo143 @AEWTicketMap Sarcasm? Pretty low bar to call it a success if only half the arena is filled

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@Dt33345 @tre_zen @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ The spirit of the law is the prevent cheap goals. Explain how being ahead by a toenail helped the player get a cheap goal? Implement Wenger’s law so that offside occurs only when your whole body is front. Thats what the rule was designed for

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@tre_zen @Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ Difference is not the same. The criticism is that being a toenail ahead offers no benefit, so why outlaw it. The spirit of the rule is to prevent easy and cheap goals. If you apply Wenger’s law, it abides by the spirit of the law. Offside only if your whole body is in front

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@inv3rs3x @marxiners Wenger’s law : the whole body must be in front of the last defender, with clear daylight between them

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@tre_zen @Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ It changes it because offside wouldn’t occur if you’re a toenail in front of the LAST DEFENDER. It would occur only if your whole body is front. When your toenail is front, you get no benefit. If your whole body is in front, you get benefit. That’s the difference

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ Yes, it’s the rule. But it’s a bad rule. They need to implement Wenger’s Law: offside only if there is clear daylight between defenders, not a toenail

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@tre_zen @Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ Wenger’s Law wouldn’t create more inconsistency: “ Wenger's Law" … states that an attacker is only offside if their entire body is ahead of the last defender, meaning there must be clear, visible space (daylight) between them”

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@DarKFuZZ_ @Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ That’s the rule, but it’s a bad rule.

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@ofootball__ South africa

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@tbflowers @DrewPavlou The rule can and should be amended

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@TStew1970 @The_Gif_Master_ 3 point line is clearly marked and fixed

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@Dt33345 @ProtoCastro33 @crazykhiro201 @The_Gif_Master_ Do you believe having his toe ahead by 1 centimeter made the difference between goal or no goal?

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@JohnSmithdmrm @TaylorTwellman The rule was created to prevent the offense from getting cheap goals. Having your toe in front of the defender 20 feet away is not consistent with the rule’s intent

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@rkylesmith Kyle, watch your mouth. No cussing

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@NealGardner_ Brazil in all likelihood? The Japanese are beating them

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@OnyxOdds Spain, France, and Argentina have to beat their opponents

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@Novig Spain, France, and Argentina have to get through all of their opponents first

[Percentagesign @Percentagesign2]

@WrestlePurists This guy is so hard to understand. Most people didn’t know what the hell he said