@Randalflech@MomsPostingLs A partnership cannot exist if both sides aren't willing. Rather than 'eradicate all of the other gender,' it will be some individual men choosing a companion bot rather than deal with the opposite sex.
Yet it will still have devastating consequences for women.
@Sentientmtndew@MomsPostingLs And in most of society as a whole, women are easiest to replace. And women are, on average, the more social and emotionally attached of the two genders.
The bots aren't just for wombs, EVERYTHING modern women are willing to offer men is at risk.
Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "Where did they get it?"
Activist: "What?"
Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere."
Activist: "From... eating?"
Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it."
Activist: "The soil?"
Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from."
Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it."
Activist: "Then just don't have the cow."
Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle."
Activist: "It's not that simple."
Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."