@jimmythej1@EnochsEgo@armousa7 I agree only that there's no purpose or story. But it's showing technical competency. It's able to express things that take the beginner literally months to learn. It is completely democratizing the work of VFX.
@jonathan_wilke That's besides the point. It displays technical competency. This democratizes motion graphics and allows different types of users like video editors, content creators to incorporate high quality VFX into their work.
Motion graphics has a steep learning curve and with A.i. it democratizes the playing field. Video editors, content creators now have the ability to produce motion graphics with a mere prompt for their work without needing to pay/outsource VFX creators.
@harisahmad59 Normies are literally silo'd in their algorithmic chambers. They do not know what exists outside of them. As long as you capture your particular silo'd user you'll be fine.
@tomjullienvfx Whether it looks the same or not is irrelevant. The tech has 100% democratized motion graphics. I spent roughly a year doing AE and it was a difficult learning process. Now I don't need to do any of that time consuming shit and can just literally ask a.i. to produce what I need.
@EnochsEgo@armousa7 They can't tell you why and they create a massive COPE argument. Where I see a.i. has technical competency and can be used in conjunction with a designer, they cope and say "final 1 shots aren't sufficient as a product," but ignore the fact the tech democratized motion design.
@armousa7 Sorry but the video displays technical competency. There is no longer a large barrier to entry for motion graphics.
If a casual user uses opus/claude they'll be able to integrate these animations into their workflow without needing to pay top $$
@bernips@PositivFuturist Just completely untrue. For the beginner turning to a VFX suite for the first time, all of what it's doing would take YEARS to learn. It's democratized motion graphics for all casual creators now.