@daltonwelbern Baron has literally said he thought Charlie Kirk was still alive in the car, and that's where his security team killed him. And they killed him by electrocution. They come up with the craziest nonsensical theories
Exploding Mic Theory: Low IQ Conspiracy Slop
Let’s apply basic physics, forensics, and common sense to this desperate attempt to keep the grift alive:
• No visible explosion or smoke: Zero flash, blast wave, or plume on high-res video. An explosive powerful enough to kill via neck trauma should produce obvious visual and auditory signatures. We see nothing.
• No damage to the thin white t-shirt: Not one tear, burn, char mark, scorch, or even residue. A directional charge delivering lethal energy would shred fabric, leave burns, and embed particles. There’s nothing.
• Directional force with zero equal-and-opposite reaction: Newton’s Third Law doesn’t get shelved because you have an overactive imagination. A blast with enough force for lethal trauma would have visibly knocked Charlie backward, ruptured the mic assembly outward, or thrown shrapnel/debris into bystanders. Instead, the reaction is consistent with a high-velocity projectile’s impact and temporary cavitation.
• Hundreds of witnesses within 20 feet heard nothing from the mic: No one, not attendees, security, or those in line to ask questions reported an explosion originating from Charlie’s body. The only supersonic crack-bang reported matches a distant rifle shot (~0.2 second delay for .30-06 at that range).
This isn’t “deep state tech”; it’s grifter fiction that ignores basic physics, ballistics, video evidence, recovered .30-06 rifle, DNA, trajectory, and confessions. People sincerely wanting the truth follow the data. Conspiracy slop grifters invent mechanisms to fit a narrative.
Below is a 20g PETN explosion that Candace Owens showed which would be similar to what could possibly be contained in a Rode mic and would be required to simulate a 30–06 wound.
We see nothing like that.
@mayormeez@cocobutlerr@TheOfficerTatum Why didn't it take MLKs head off? Maybe sometimes bullets do odd things? You all say it's impossible it was a 30.06, but MLK is a perfect example that that bullet doesn't always cause massive exploding damage.
Enough with the nonsense. Claims that Charlie Kirk's lapel mic somehow exploded and killed him don't match the evidence, the injury, or simple common sense. 🤦🏾♂️
If you cared about Charlie, you'd care about the truth.
I'm a Minnesotan. I was born here. My father's side of my family was born here. My great grandparents were immigrants from Scandinavia.
I come from Salt of the Earth stock.
My family worked hard, made a name for themselves and contributed to making Minnesota a great place.
My grandfather helped make it so you can seal packages easy, scrub your dishes clean, leave love notes all over the place (and remove them without residue) among other conveniences we all take for granted.
My father was a highly regarded surgeon who mentored so many other surgeons and provided care for the movers, shakers and celebrities of this country - all while providing care for his Twin Cities patients.
Both of them created hundreds, if not thousands of jobs in this state.
I'm so glad neither of them lived long enough to see how their contributions to this once great state have been squandered.
It's time to take Minnesota back. It's time to make Minnesota respectable again. It's time to go back to our hard working, salt of the earth roots.
Why does @RealCandaceO believe she is entitled to literally EVERYTHING she demands, right when she demands it?
Bitch, you're a podcaster (A BAD ONE, I MIGHT ADD). Not a detective, not an investigative reporter. You hated Charlie. But even if you didn't, you still wouldn't be owed anything. By anyone.
Malignant narcissists like you will never learn that lesson. You need a straitjacket and electroshock therapy on the highest setting, every hour of every day for the rest of your shit life.
Last year DOJ published a report.
For every 10,000 blacks, 153 violent crimes are committed by a black person each year against a white person.
The same figure for violent crimes committed by whites against a black person: 3.4.
A black person is 50-times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white person than for a white person to commit a violent crime against a black person.
This is an extraordinary difference in the rates of violence committed between these two groups.
We are told that whites are systemically racist.
We are told that whites are successful because they oppress others.
But the facts tell the opposite story.
Blacks are not the ones being victimized.
Whites are.
Western civilization has been successful not because it was oppressive.
It has been successful because whites created, starting thousands of years ago, systems that are impartial and fair.
Today these systems are being dismantled.
Criminals are being released because of their skin color.
Law-abiding citizens are punished because of theirs.
All in service of an ideology that is simply false.
This puts everyone in danger.
This is so devastating. Imagine being a black parent tonight. How do you protect your children? If they go out and stab just one person, they might go to prison. It’s like a black man in America can’t even murder anyone anymore. Unimaginable. Jim Crow all over again. I’m furious.
Why is @ProjectConstitu profile pic of Charlie Kirk? He clearly despises Erika and Turning Point and probably didn't even like Charlie either.
He's just like everyone else who hated Turning Point and Charlie who now are claiming to fight for the truth on his behalf.