pesets

🔞 Drawpile & Krita (ab)user

[pesets @pestsowe]

@4nonirik Thank you, i appreciate the kind words a lot!

[Moti @Moti_Fur]

can someone make one but its just nick wilde in a bikini instead

[pesets @pestsowe]

@Matheus58323427 XD

[pesets @pestsowe]

@Zielona_literka thank you! i'm glad you liked it

[phol @igorczas1]

thank you to all for the love and support!! roses

[pesets @pestsowe]

just to embarass myself here are stages:
1. the initial sketch (terrifying and painful to look at)
2. reiteration in krita
3. coloring (hands out the window)
4. details and finishing touches
thanks to @igorczas1 for critique and ideas (check this person out also)

[pesets @pestsowe]

I'm mindblown by statistic this post has gotten
It completely exploded my page and overnight i went from 25 to 200+ followers
Thank you all for engagement, likes and reposts! I appreciate it a lot!
I've got some ideas on what to do after my current commission queue so stay tuned!

[pesets @pestsowe]

total lie

[pesets @pestsowe]

Drawpill Highlights June
1. literallí me (drawer)
2. violet person
3. saphire person
4. average school experience (thank god i finished it years ago)

[pesets @pestsowe]

@igorczas1 another hit

[pesets @pestsowe]

@nozomupilled To call yourself an artist means to call your stuff art which might be considered pretentious and you can just plainly announce the mere fact that you’re drawing but not all the time, so it’s sometimes you draw

[pesets @pestsowe]

my new romani oc

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi Okay, beating around the bush, so wrapping it up.
Kid drawing a pikachu should be jailed. No nuance or context for use or consent is needed. Thank you for participation in this discussion

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi pathetic adhominem; person who draws pikachu is not a stealer, if the same person sells it then it is a violation. consent is contextual and intricate. and you skipped it completely by calling both 'use' and me a rapist
drawing = rape, gotcha

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi My stance is clear as day, you can proceed to cope with by not understanding what i mean and burying it into vague formal semantics glossing over important details

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi exactly, you are likely to 'use' within certain boundaries. In your formula the term use is vague, so eating using a fork and stabbing a fork in a persons neck is the same. Nobody explicitly told you its bad, however they don't consent to this specific use

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi so when a person uses a ballpoint pen at a workplace its the same as me taking the someone elses patent and manufacturing and selling products of of it?

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi Yes, it does matter. And yes, if AI training uses artists´ work without their consent then it is a violation. If an artist or company is against their work being used in AI generation then its a violation.

[pesets @pestsowe]

@YellingAtNerds2 @Lunaflorisi compare rape with drawing bro
Drawing a popular character without claiming it is not considered stealing. Otherwise fanart simply would not exist. Owners of character can manage their character usage. If it was a crime an appropriate action would have taken place