@ObektivnoBg@dgaytandzhieva Как така се получава, че решението на всеки проблем (създаден от други скудоумни решения на Брюксел) е рестрикции и ограничения за населението? Когато проумеем че това винаги е било крайната цел, разбираме че проблемите са доста добре обмислени. Управление от социопати
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
2% inflation is good for the economy
2% inflation is good for the econom
2% inflation is good for the econo
2% inflation is good for the econ
2% inflation is good for the eco
2% inflation is good for the ec
2% inflation is good for the e
2% inflation is good for the
2% inflation is good for th
2% inflation is good for t
2% inflation is good for
2% inflation is good fo
2% inflation is good f
2% inflation is good
2% inflation is goo
2% inflation is go
2% inflation is g
2% inflation is
2% inflation i
2% inflation
2% inflatio
2% inflati
2% inflat
2% infla
2% infl
2% inf
2% in
2% i
2%
2
21
21 m
21 mi
21 mil
21 mill
21 milli
21 millio
21 million
21 million b
21 million bi
21 million bit
21 million bitc
21 million bitco
21 million bitcoi
21 million bitcoin
21 million bitcoin i
21 million bitcoin is
21 million bitcoin is m
21 million bitcoin is mu
21 million bitcoin is muc
21 million bitcoin is much
21 million bitcoin is much b
21 million bitcoin is much be
21 million bitcoin is much bet
21 million bitcoin is much bett
21 million bitcoin is much bette
21 million bitcoin is much better
@ObektivnoBg@dgaytandzhieva Целта на всичките кризи (здравна, военна, мигрантска, климатична, хранителна , икономическа и накрая финансова) които ни пускат една след друга е точно тази -максимално ниво на хаос. И когато положението стане нетърпимо за овцете, решението е готово.
The greatest lie in modern economics is that deflation destroys societies. Every economics textbook warns of deflationary spirals, mass unemployment, and economic collapse. Yet deflation simply means a reduction in the money supply—and this reveals truths our monetary authorities desperately want to hide.
When prices fall across the economy, the physical structure of production remains intact. Your tools, machines, factories, roads, and food supplies don't vanish because numbers on price tags shrink. Production continues profitably because both selling prices and input costs decline together. The profit margin depends on the spread between what you sell for and what you buy for, not the absolute price level.
Deflation does redistribute wealth dramatically. Heavily indebted companies and individuals face bankruptcy as their revenues fall while debts remain fixed. Irving Fisher observed that "the more the debtors pay, the more they owe." But this transfers ownership to those who saved money and avoided excessive debt—rewarding prudence over speculation. The firms don't disappear; new owners simply run them at the lower price level.
Compare this to inflation, which creates anonymous winners at the expense of anonymous losers through the hidden tax of currency debasement. Deflation operates through visible bankruptcy according to law. The Federal Reserve, major banks, and government-connected businesses lose their privileged access to newly printed money. Political entrepreneurs who built fortunes on cheap credit face the market's judgment.
This explains why every monetary authority fights deflation with unlimited money printing. They're not protecting the economy—they're protecting the parasitic financial structure that feeds on monetary expansion.
Are you watching the Chinese New Year Gala? The Robot Kungfu show is mind blowing!!!
They just executed a coordinated martial arts routine with spatial precision, rhythm control, and dynamic balance adjustments in real time.
Kung fu, one of China’s most iconic traditional art forms , performed by machines built with cutting-edge AI control systems, advanced actuators, and high-speed feedback loops. Ancient discipline meets algorithmic precision.
Last year, humanoid robots stepped onto the Spring Festival Gala stage for the first time. This year, they held synchronized kung fu stances with balance that would humble half of us after leg day.
And they did it live!!! On the most-watched television event on the planet.
The progress in just one year is magical.
That’s what we call China speed.
What makes it even sweeter is where this happened.
I love how the progress is integrated in culture. In celebration. In a Lunar New Year gala watched by hundreds of millions.
It’s music to my ears.
The robots didn’t look like they were “trying” anymore. They looked like they belonged.
Their joint articulation was smoother.
Their formation timing tighter.
Their balance recovery almost elegant.
Their choreography is expressive.
That’s what happens when AI models improve, control systems get smarter, hardware stabilizes, and iteration cycles compress.
One year in robotics today is not the same as one year ten years ago.
It’s compounding.
If this is what 12 months looks like,
imagine 36.
The Chinese New Year Robot Kungfu Gala is just futuristic.
It was quite the statement!
The future is getting better very, very fast.
It was so beautiful to watch. What do you think?
Most people think they understand how money works, but THEY DON'T!
I learned about 90% of what I know about money AFTER I started learning about Bitcoin.
If you can't answer the following questions, you won't understand Bitcoin:
- Why do all fiat currencies fail?
- Why did the Roman Empire fall?
- What is the Nixon Shock?
- Why is the US Dollar the world reserve currency?
- What is the difference between credit and debt?
- How does inflation work?
- What's the difference between CPI inflation and monetary inflation?
- Why was gold used as money for THOUSANDS of years?
- How is new money issued?
- What are the functions and ideal characteristics of money?
- What is fractional reserve banking?
@ObektivnoBg Звучи като добър план, но най вероятно няма да проработи, защото има по добър пазител на стойност от златото - Биткойн. И Америка залага много на него. Китай отново ще са изоставащи както при сребърния стандарт в миналото
“I buy avocados that are grown in Mexico and shipped to the UK.”
“I buy tomatoes that are grown in Morocco and shipped to the UK.”
“I buy quinoa that is grown in Bolivia and shipped to the UK.”
"Red meat from local UK farmers should be reduced. It’s bad for the planet.”
🤷♂️
@ObektivnoBg Дано AI да поумнее по бързо, че хората съвсем изпростяха. Все си мислиш , че по голяма глупост не могат да измислят, докато не осъзнаеш , че това е целта на живота им - да прецакат твоя
@ObektivnoBg Защо му е на правителството да "обогатява" гражданите си с дълг за дребни суми, освен ако не са го закъсали дотолкова че да е проблем да го вземат от финансовите пазари!?
@ObektivnoBg Е как ще се съгласят с Тръмп, като ще изстинат топлите места на всичките паразити от ЕК и НПО-та!? Хубавото е че сами се закопават с всеки ход и падането им е въпрос на време
@ObektivnoBg Всички трябва да знаем на кого да благодарим и за ЕС и за евро шиткойн зоната и да направим така че същите да нямат никакво влияние в управлението на страната за напред