Bram

British. Worried about where my country is headed . No DM's . Restore Britain .

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Paulw45CdoRM They can't say anything else or their whole world view goes out the window .

[Paul Martin Wilson 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 @Paulw45CdoRM]

The sick sick leftard izlamic rapist apologists...

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Gracie_Blue89 @Hampsta4 It did and William isn't the answer .

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Gracie_Blue89 Complete pillock with no idea how many hate him , Dick .

[Neil Hughes @BlobWarriorUK]

3 of them hired a BMW with false I.D with the specific purpose to target a lone female in Birmingham and rape her after driving out to the countryside. They even filmed it. Convicted and given a paltry 20 years between them. Wake up and vote to deport this scum!

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@cillianblack Piers Morgan is the worst type of moron .

[Neil Hughes @BlobWarriorUK]

After murdering 3 people Valdo Calocane could be eligible for release from hospital in January if his "mental illness" is deemed to be under control. Our justice system is a complete farce.

He should have been executed.

[Penny @phughes76340646]

He’s even a useless clown 🤡
He’s not even funny 🤦‍♀️

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

From Gaza to NATO: The Revolutionary Left's Plans for Britain's Students

On 20 November, British schoolchildren and university students are being urged to walk out of classrooms and join an international protest in Trafalgar Square. The grievances are familiar: underfunded education, disappearing jobs, military spending and Gaza. But the organisers' wider programme contains a demand extending far beyond student politics. They want NATO dissolved. While Russia wages war against Ukraine and threatens European security, young Britons are being recruited into a movement seeking to dismantle the alliance underpinning Western defence for nearly eighty years.

The mobilisation follows unrest in France, where protests over genuine educational grievances escalated into violence, looting and arson. British organisers celebrate the French demonstrations and urge students and workers to join an international campaign against capitalism, authoritarianism and the far Right. Socialist Students, SOAS Liberated Zone and other activists are promoting the November action. Their ambitions extend well beyond improving education.

The manifesto demands an end to Western rearmament, NATO's dissolution and fundamental economic and political change. Who benefits if NATO disappears? Russia would gain strategically. Poland and the Baltic states would lose the collective-defence guarantee they sought because they feared Moscow. China would welcome a weakened transatlantic alliance. Iran would face a less cohesive Western security partnership. None needs to direct these campaigners to benefit from their demands.

And this is where Gaza becomes important. Palestinian solidarity provides revolutionary organisations with a powerful means of mobilising students. Young people concerned about suffering in Gaza can find themselves drawn into a campaign opposing capitalism, Western defence, military expenditure and liberal democratic institutions. The organisers make these connections openly. Gaza supplies the immediate grievance. Their manifesto supplies the wider ideological destination.

The historical pattern is familiar. Since the late 1960s, revolutionary movements have regarded universities, student unions and education as places to shape political attitudes over generations. The long march through the institutions envisaged changing society from within. Today's international student networks demonstrate how campus activism can become part of a coordinated movement crossing national borders.

The French experience makes this especially relevant. Investigations have identified communist, socialist, Islamist-associated and pro-Palestinian organisations participating in or supporting demonstrations. Their ultimate objectives differ, sometimes profoundly, but shared opposition to Israel, Western foreign policy and established institutions provides common ground. The British mobilisation now brings elements of that campaign to London.

Advocating socialism, opposing NATO or demonstrating for Palestine is lawful. But political freedom also requires scrutiny. Who organises these international campaigns? Who finances them? What relationships exist between participating organisations? These are legitimate questions when political movements are recruiting young people into campaigns with profound implications for European security.

The organisers have published their objectives. Britain should examine them equally closely. With Ukraine fighting for survival and European governments strengthening their defences, a movement demanding NATO's dissolution deserves serious scrutiny. Above all, why is a campaign supposedly concerned with Britain's classrooms asking the next generation to dismantle the alliance protecting their country?

"Investigations have identified communist, socialist, Islamist-associated and pro-Palestinian organisations participating in or supporting demonstrations."

[@Billypaguk2025 @BillyPag2023]

No sheilds
No horses

Totally different policing than others we've seen

It's getting Impossible for the bag n drag home secetary to deny she's operating 2 teired justice system 1 for us and a different 1 for them

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

John Healey has betrayed Britain.

He has betrayed service personnel.

He has betrayed the office of Defence Secretary.

He has cut almost £1 billion from spending on leaking and mouldy barracks.

As Defence Secretary he announced £7 billion on accommodation spending in this parliament.

“Our heroes and their loved ones live in the homes they

“For too long, many military families have lived in sub-standard homes, but this Government is taking decisive action to fix the dire state of military accommodation.”

Now today the MoD Permanent Secretary admits £7 billion won’t be spent in this Parliament.

Hot in the heels of the £2 billion cut to armoured vehicles announced yesterday…. Betrayal.

There is no other word.

And all the while, Streeting clings on the tailwind of office despite his guffage of resigning if funding didn't happen as needed.

The previous and current Defence Secretaries betray their roles and responsibilities.

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Jenny_1884 I told my granddaughter exactly this last week 😂 . She was complaining about detention for being late . Mr Eustace the science teacher , he was deadly with it , plenty of bumpy heads in my class

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Britain Debates Conscription. Into What Army?

Britain is talking about conscription again. One historian suggests unemployed graduates could be first in line. Those who refuse might face fines. Russia threatens British interests. Warnings of wider European conflict grow louder by the month. Before deciding which young Britons should be sent to fight, there is a simpler question nobody in Westminster wants to answer first. Fight with what?

The 2025 Strategic Defence Review already told us the answer, and it was not reassuring. Decades of reduced capacity have left the Armed Forces thin, ammunition stockpiles low, reserves weak and the defence industrial base shrunk. The review called for a whole-of-society approach, recognising that modern war demands factories and engineers as much as soldiers, supply chains as much as rifles. Britain read that review. Britain has done little to answer it.

Successive governments spent the peace dividend after the Cold War. Budgets were cut. Military establishments shrank. Industrial capacity withered. Yet Britain kept speaking as though it remained a major military power, all while quietly hollowing out the means to act like one. Ukraine has shown the world what industrial warfare actually consumes. Ammunition disappears in weeks. Equipment is destroyed faster than it can be replaced. Stockpiles built for a different era vanish within months of serious fighting.

Now the state proposes to ask young civilians to make up the shortfall. Historian David Swift suggests unemployed graduates might be conscripted first, on the grounds that the policy would prove popular. Popular with whom? Certainly not the graduates being called up. Unemployment is not a military qualification. A degree is not evidence of combat readiness. Recruitment built on who is least likely to object is not recruitment built on who the country actually needs.

Fairness matters here too. If conscription is genuinely necessary for national survival, the burden must fall according to principles the public can see and test. Essential civilian work would need protection. Conscientious objection would need proper process. None of it means anything without instructors, equipment and the command structures to turn recruits into soldiers rather than bodies in uniform. A state that conscripts thousands without the capacity to train them has not strengthened its defence. It has created a queue.

Sixteen months after the Strategic Defence Review exposed Britain's military weaknesses, the government is still developing legislation to strengthen its ability to mobilise military personnel and increase industrial capacity in a crisis. Ministers acknowledged earlier this month that the details remained unfinished. Britain needs to know whether its factories, supply chains and industrial workforce could sustain a prolonged war. Yet even the legal framework for preparing the country remains incomplete.

Russia's nuclear arsenal makes direct confrontation a serious danger, which is precisely why credible conventional deterrence and NATO's collective defence matter so much. Weakness invites aggression. Strength does not guarantee peace, but it narrows the room for miscalculation, and narrowing that room is the entire point.

Politicians owe the public an account before they start drafting lists of who might be compelled to serve. What happened to the forces, the factories and the stockpiles that defence used to rest on? A generation should not be handed the bill for three decades of political neglect without first being told how it accumulated.

If Britain is serious about preparing for war, rebuilding the means to deter one would be the sensible place to begin. Conscription without capacity is not a defence policy. It is a slogan wearing a uniform.

"Historian David Swift suggests unemployed graduates might be conscripted first, on the grounds that the policy would prove popular."

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@JChimirie66677 My son won't be fighting for people that hate him .

[Farai Mazhindu @FaraiMazhindu]

France will not recover; this is the end. The nation has lost the cultural war. The demographic structure has shifted forever.

People who find it easy to spray graffiti on the magnificent architecture of French cities and burn Paris are the new French people.

All class and decorum are gone.

Arrivals from failed third-world states are not coming to assimilate or to be French; they are coming to live the third-world way.

The unfolding civil unrest in France is not fundamentally about student grievances or dilapidated classrooms.

The chaos is the inevitable result of an unholy, anti-white alliance that has turned parts of major French cities into dangerous enclaves where state authority has completely surrendered.

The Emmanuel Macron administration has completely lost control.

The political elite have spent years hiding the true demographic shifts, pretending that multicultural integration works while the traditional French way of life is hollowed out.
The French state is broke and paralyzed because it has spent decades funding its own demographic replacement.

The areas burning today are heavily linked to enclaves where the police rarely dare to venture, zones where Western legal norms have been replaced by radical, sectarian influences.

While the mainstream media tries to fact-check the footage by calling it old or out of context, the raw video on the ground shows a society reaching a violent tipping point.

This unrest is a warning sign for the entire Western world.

A country that refuses to defend its borders, its history, and its culture will eventually face the progressive implosion of social trust.

Once you surrender your borders and sacrifice your national identity to accommodate diasporas with totally different cultural backgrounds, you do not get a richer society; you get a war zone.

France has completely failed its own people.

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@afneil And he thinks the entitled Lefties that are usually the perpetrators will listen . A bit like brochures for sex pests .

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Paulw45CdoRM Toynbee talking the same old crap Starmer did , it'll be ok ,just wait .

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@Jenny_1884 November 20th , remember this date .

[Jen k 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Jenny_1884]

I honestly believe that this government wants unrest just like other western countries have.

They want to restrict our lives & this would be their opportunity to do it.

None of this is coincidental, it’s all planned.

[Bram @pete_bramley]

@phughes76340646 If we're stronger together ,why was Rupert Lowe's olive branch immediately rejected ?