Dear Labour
You literally don’t understand why construction companies aren’t building masses of houses! And why they won’t do what you tell them.
Let me help you.
▪️There aren’t enough builders, bricks, or cement. Businesses forecast years in advance for developments. They can’t ramp up in a year.
▪️Developers have cash flow and budgets, unlike the government they can’t print money and double in size in a year. And you just screwed the economy by raising taxes and minimum wage.
▪️From 2027, imported raw materials like steel and cement face a new carbon taxes of up to 24%. Gained can pretend he’s saving the planet) Developers have no idea what the hit will be. And so cannot build blind.
▪️If housing isn’t financially viable, builders won’t build. Labour is demanding cheap entry level homes. But developers make little profit on these, so little that only building these will mean they can’t pay the wage bill! So they have mixed price developments. Higher priced houses aren’t selling because the economy is wankered (technical term)
▪️The state of the economy means huge job insecurity, why would Developers risk over supplying a market that is stagnant?
▪️New house building and completions are down in many places because over supply will see a collapse in prices and developers would make a loss. It would be insane for a business to plan to make a loss.
▪️ net zero targets have left thousands of finished homes unable to be connected to the grid! Brilliant. Why would house builders risk building and not being able to sell because they can’t get electricity.
Had Labour had any business experience or economic knowledge they would know that councils have to heavily subsidise new developments … but they have no money!
Governments can’t force businesses to harm themselves. It’s an idiotic promise made because you don’t understand how profit works.
You’re welcome
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
🚨 I would like to confirm to the rest of the world that regardless of what our Prime Minister Keir Starmer says, we do NOT have free speech in the UK 🚨
The following legislation regulates, criminalises, and censors all speech deemed “unacceptable” by the authorities:
💣 Public Order Act
Originally created to address riots and violence, this law is now used to criminalise speech considered “insulting” or “alarming.” Even silent prayer in public has led to arrests, especially near abortion clinics, using public order powers.
💣 Communications Act – Section 127
Makes it a criminal offence to send a message online that is “grossly offensive” (to anyone who finds it offensive). The wording is so vague that it’s used against jokes, satire, and dissenting political views.
💣 Malicious Communications Act
Targets messages intended to cause “distress or anxiety” terms that are entirely subjective. Increasingly used to silence criticism or controversial opinions.
💣 Online Safety Act
Championed as child protection, this law gives Ofcom sweeping powers to police the internet. It compels platforms to remove even legal speech if Ofcom deems it “harmful”, or face fines. Even internationally. Ofcom can also refer posters to the police for further investigation.
💣 Counter-Terrorism and Security Act – Framed as anti-extremism, but now widely used to monitor and silence individuals who express views that challenge official narratives, even in schools, (even children), in universities, the NHS, and journalism. There is no fixed legal definition of “extremism.”
💣 Hate Crime Legislation - Including the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the Sentencing Act 2020
These laws impose harsher penalties for speech that shows “hostility” based on race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability, even when no violence is involved. Intent is irrelevant. perception by the audience is enough.
💣 Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act
Allows for pre-emptive arrests and bans on individuals for speech or protest activity that could potentially cause “serious disruption.” Before they have even done it! Peaceful protest is no longer reliably protected under UK law.
💣 Ofcom and the Broadcast Code
Ofcom regulates TV and radio, and now expands into online content under the Online Safety Act. It decides what opinions can be broadcast and what must be removed, in the name of “harm reduction.”
💣 Equality Act (as applied in workplace policy)
While not criminal law, this Act supports workplace codes used to discipline or dismiss employees for expressing views that conflict with current diversity, equity, or inclusion standards. Many people have lost their jobs for stating biological facts or political opinions.
💣 A New Government Taskforce to Monitor Speech.
The UK has expanded its Counter Disinformation Unit, working to monitor “narrative risk.” A new Home Office taskforce is using AI to detect “trending narratives” online and report posts that may cause “public disorder”, not illegal posts, just ones that challenge the government line.
💣 Proposed law – Expanding “hate crime” laws to include “misogyny” This is expected to criminalise more types of speech deemed 'harmful' to women. (But authorities differ on what a woman is regardless of the supreme court judgement).
💣 Proposed law – A broad “Conversion Therapy Ban”
Still under consultation, but could make it illegal to even discuss certain views on gender or sexuality, including in private conversations, counselling, or prayer.
None of this was voted for by the public. None of it protects our right to speak freely. All of it empowers the state to decide what we are allowed to say. We have state-approved speech, policed by vague legislation, corporate censorship, and unelected regulators.
Britain is not a free country. don't even dare to tell me that it is ...Not anymore.
🚨 LABOUR - Would never have been elected if voters had been told the truth.
And the truth behind the glossy manifesto actually looks like this 👇🏻
▪️Winter fuel allowance cancelled
▪️highest tax in 70 years
▪️highest electricity in the world
▪️fake £22 billion black hole
▪️ 22.3% pay rise for doctors
▪️15% pay rise for train drivers
▪️attempts to join EU by stealth
▪️ Closed the migrant barge
▪️4 more years of hotels for illegals
▪️NI tax rises for businesses
▪️£500 million to foreign farmers
▪️£3.4 BILLION on consultants
▪️Two tier policing at protests & riots
▪️crackdown on free speech
▪️No deportations for foreign criminals
▪️let prisoners out early
▪️net zero madness spending
▪️Carbon capture experiment
▪️solar factories on green belt
▪️oops had to cancel non Dom policy
▪️VAT on private schools backfired
▪️Softer sentences, prisons are full
▪️Free clothes for MPs
▪️Free tickets for MPs
▪️Rent free house for MPs
▪️free Pass for Ali for Downing Street
▪️introducing pay per mile
▪️Ended steel production
▪️Stopped oil and gas licenses
▪️ refused to use huge new gas field
▪️Spaffed £8.3b on British energy
▪️Energy bills went up TWICE
▪️Palestine marches out of control
▪️Ended free speech in universities
▪️Increases in fuel duty
▪️Said “free the sausages”
▪️Fired his chief of staff
▪️Fired his energy minister
▪️Chancellor isn’t an economist
▪️Gave £millions more to Ukraine
▪️Gave £50 million to Syrian militants
▪️Richest pop star got free police escort
▪️made up some ‘science’ on fly wheels
▪️stopped Rwanda
▪️largest number of illegal migrants ever
▪️Didn’t change his ‘special’ pension
▪️Gave away the Chagos Islands
▪️lost Rosie Duffield
▪️let Ukraine use Storm shadow
▪️revoked land wind farm ban
▪️announced Pylons near houses
▪️Banned Elon from ‘Investment Summit’
▪️misogyny would be classed as terrorism
▪️ investigated by Electoral Commission
▪️ Lord Ali under investigation
▪️Inheritance tax on farmers
▪️Lied to WASPI women
▪️Attempting to bring in blasphemy laws
▪️Gave £500 million to foreign farmers
▪️Chancellor turned out to be unqualified
▪️highest government borrowing in 34 yrs
▪️MP investigated for corruption
▪️Banning parents from seeing curriculum
▪️Reviewing blasphemy laws
▪️stabbing up
▪️no Grooming gang enquiry
Complete chaos in under 9 months. Imagine the state of the UK after 5 more years 🤡
KNEECAP STATEMENT:
They want you to believe words are more harmful than genocide.
Establishment figures, desperate to silence us, have combed through hundreds of hours of footage and interviews, extracting a handful of words from months or years ago to manufacture moral hysteria.
Let us be unequivocal: we do not, and have never, supported Hamas or Hezbollah. We condemn all attacks on civilians, always. It is never okay. We know this more than anyone, given our nation's history.
We also reject any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual. Ever. An extract of footage, deliberately taken out of all context, is now being exploited and weaponised, as if it were a call to action.
This distortion is not only absurd - it is a transparent effort to derail the real conversation.
All two million Palestinian people in Gaza are currently being starved to death by Israel.
At least 20,000 children in Gaza have been killed. The British government continues to supply arms to Israel, even after scores of NHS doctors warned Keir Starmer in August that children were being systematically executed with sniper shots to the head.
Instead of defending innocent people or the principles of international law, the powerful in Britain have abetted slaughter and famine.
This is where real anger and outrage should be directed towards.
To the Amess and Cox families, we send our heartfelt apologies, we never intended to cause you hurt.
Kneecap’s message has always been — and remains — one of love, inclusion, and hope. This is why our music resonates across generations, countries, classes and cultures and has brought hundreds of thousands of people to our gigs.
No smear campaign will change that.
Suddenly, days after calling out the US administration at Coachella to applause and solidarity, there is an avalanche of outrage and condemnation by the political classes of Britain.
The real crimes are not in our performances; the real crimes are the silence and complicity of those in power.
Shame on them.
SILENCED - The UK State did this to terrify you into compliance.
Horrifying and tragic. Persuaded into pleading guilty by State funded lawyers, even though she knew she wasn’t!
My heart aches for this family. Their story told brilliantly by @AllisonPearson 🥲
NET ZERO - I just can’t stand the lies and incompetence.
We are being forced into societal changes, where the ‘solutions’ to the fictional climate crisis are worse than the problems they are trying to solve!
It is incumbent on all of us to call out bollocks! And not accept hypocrisy or the ridiculous fear mongering of the media!
We must refuse to accept things that do not make sense. Like this.
▪️No forests or trees should be cut down for solar panels which last 10 years
▪️No forests or trees should be cut down and replaced with wind farms
▪️No one should be forced to buy an EV car, produced with huge emissions from mineral extraction and more plastics than your fuel car
▪️No one should be forced to pay a tax for made up carbon credits, which enrich the elites
▪️No one should be coerced into using SMART meters, able to be controlled externally, in order to make you ‘behave’
▪️No one should have their voices silenced by Government policed climate censorship. Your silence means the lies can continue.
▪️No one should have their lives restricted and their freedoms curtailed through international agreements they were never asked to vote on.
▪️No country should be forced to take in ‘climate migrants’ as per the migration pact. Not should they be forced to accept cultural change in the name of ‘racism’
▪️No country should pay repetitions, as a modern colonial bribe, to poorer countries to ‘save the planet’
▪️No country should be able to claim a fictitious ‘net zero’ gain, by out sourcing their coal supply and importing it instead.
▪️No country should be able to claim
‘fictitious‘zero’ gain by outsourcing solar panels, infrastructure products (such as cement) or any consumer products by importing it.
▪️No country should be able to ban wood burners, yet import vast quantities of wood pellets to burn as ‘renewable’ power.
▪️No politician should be allowed to stand on a mandate that doesn’t absolutely detail every single penny of tax payers money being spent on net zero bollocks.
▪️No citizen should ever have to pay a tax that doesn’t benefit their own country.
▪️No tax payer should be forced to subsidise a 4th Industrial Revolution that will make them poorer and that they did not vote for.
▪️Every single election party manifesto must detail every penny of tax payers money that will be spent in supporting the concept of net zero.
▪️No information about CO2 greening the planet should ever be hidden.
▪️No scientific paper disproving the narrative should ever be removed by those who ‘own the science’
You are being lied to …. everyday, every week and in every ‘official’ information source about the Climate Emergency
You know your government and media lied to you about COVID, why then do you believe they are telling you the truth about Net Zero?
It’s time to wake up 🔥
PARLIAMENT - The price of fish & chips in the UK is now £10.88 per portion.
This is the taxpayer subsidised Dining menu in Parliament.
Where Not one main course, including steak costs over £10.
Because we aren’t all in this together 🤡
🚨”IF THIS IS TRUE” - I am Bernadette Spofforth… you know me as Bernie.
And this is the story of how the State silenced an ordinary citizen, through arrest and bail conditions, to ensure only State truth was heard.
With special thanks to @sdavieslaw@speechUnion
The trans activists know they can’t win in a fair fight. They suppress, censor and deplatform because they know their position is insane and can’t be defended. If open discussion on this topic was allowed, their side would be crushed into oblivion in less than a week.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, explains how the real goal of the scamdemic was total digital enslavement, using digital ID and CBDCs:
"[The] logical endpoint [is] totalitarian control of everyone on the planet using digital techniques. This whole thing is a multi year plan designed to smash civil society, to wreck the economy and to introduce various digital controls, [including] digital ID."
"If you accept this, you are in the first stages of the same funnel that cattle go down waiting [for] the stun bullet. So please say no, because there’s no escape from the totalitarian control that digital ID will grant. Whoever owns the database and controls the algorithm, controls you."
Full interview: https://t.co/iKOzPB0JFT
#DigitalID #CBDCs #GreatReset
Remember the daily "Covid deaths" updates and graphs they used to scare people into believing in the Covid scam? Now they've started doing something similar for the #ClimateScam. 🤡
I love how they added nine decimal places to the miniscule 1.27°C temperature rise, to make it look like a huge number.
And I love how they started in 1880 as if history started in 1880. If they'd started at the Medieval Warm Period, it would show a decline in temperature. 🤪
#ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
Australian geologist, Ian Plimer, effortlessly disposes of some of the popular myths perpetuated by the Net Zero cult.
"[Changes in climate] are driven by that great ball of heat in the sky, which we call 'the Sun'. A trace gas (CO2) has nothing to do with our climate."
"If we get further away from the Sun it gets cooler and if we get closer to the Sun it gets warmer. No legislation, from Canberra or from the UN, can change the orbit of the Earth."
#ClimateHoax #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #GreatReset