@JackPosobiec In some places it’s being relaxed. I travelled through London Gatwick yesterday and staff told me I could take my two 850ml water bottles through security. Apparently this was relaxed two weeks ago there.
@OTURISK@felix_souz59019@sandsireland@OTURISK I’m with you. I think it’s perfectly fine to spend on ads if you’re shadowbanned (or even if not). I was responding to the other respondent suggesting you were “making a few quid”. Keep going 👍🏻
Manus just blessed me AGAIN
They saw how quickly we ran through the first 100 community codes… so they gave me 500 more….
If you missed out on the first round, here’s your chance:
1. Retweet this post
2. Follow
3. DM me “MANUS”
If you got the access code in the first round, reply with what you cooked up so far!
Manus is absolutely next level. I literally maxed out the tokens yesterday.
@wordgrammer - LLMs are text junkies: they can only gobble up text (tokens), and spit out text (tokens)
- They can't actually "call" anything (eg REST/HATEOAS API)
- So for LLM to "interact" with outside world, it must ingest or spit out tokens
- MCP: neutral language for such interactions
@MatthewBerman Deep Research looks great, but did I hear them say “the ability to work on a task for 30 minutes really does motivate a lot more compute investment”?
Curious why they needed to make that point.
🎉 恭喜发财🧧🐍 As we welcome the Chinese New Year, we're thrilled to announce the launch of Qwen2.5-VL , our latest flagship vision-language model! 🚀
💗 Qwen Chat: https://t.co/BhhXyzLt5B
📖 Blog: https://t.co/ZOf5RUXlNd
🤗 Hugging Face: https://t.co/0Eoainjqun
🤖 ModelScope: https://t.co/uTdFixhtsD
🌟 Key Highlights:
* Visual Understanding : From flowers to complex charts, Qwen2.5-VL sees it all!
* Agentic Capabilities : It’s a visual agent that can reason and interact with tools like computers & phones.
* Long Video Comprehension : Captures events in videos over 1 hour long! ⏳🎥
* Precise Localization : Generates bounding boxes & JSON outputs for accurate object detection.
* Structured Data Outputs : Perfect for finance & commerce, handling invoices, forms & more! 💼📊
Try Qwen2.5-VL now at Qwen Chat or explore models on Hugging Face & ModelScope . 🌐
The Divisional Court has issued a ruling in the case of Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, deciding to fully support the actions of the College of Physicians and Surgeons (CPSO). Dr. Gill will be seeking a leave to appeal over this decision.
Dr Gill had shared opinions on social media that countered the position of public health officials. The CPSO labelled her posts as misinformation and levied professional cautions against her.
While the Court agreed that the information she shared in her posts was not necessarily incorrect, it was inconsistent with the official position of her governing body, the CPSO, and of the public health orders in effect.
Dr. Gill further believes that the actions of the CPSO constituted a breach of her right to freedom of speech, while the Court determined that the CPSO actions against her were proportionate, balancing her right to freedom of speech with her professional responsibilities.
Dr. Gill provided an abundance of evidence to support the opinions in question; evidence the Court refused to re-evaluate. Instead, they deferred to the CPSO’s own evaluation, stating that their panel consisted of “physicians with highly relevant expertise…that this court does not have” when in reality the CPSO panel had actually deferred to the “expertise” of government’s public health arm.
The Divisional Court also dismissed arguments that the CPSO’s publishing of the cautions on Dr. Gill’s public register, and the distribution of these cautions to hospitals and regulators across the continent were punitive, instead referring to these actions as merely a “remedial measure.”
Essentially, no one in this case has evaluated the accuracy of the evidence used by the government to establish their health policies nor have they reviewed Dr. Gill’s evidence contradicting the government’s position.
In addition, both the CPSO and the Court have taken the position that doctors should not express opinions contradicting government or its public health edicts, regardless of the accuracy of the contradictory opinions.
How did Canada, the strong and free, become a country where the government is assumed to be right, regardless of evidence, and where speaking truth is a punishable offence?
To read the True North article written by Clayton DeMaine click the link; https://t.co/He4meJJxid
To read the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, click the link; https://t.co/c67u7UEl7z