Peter T

Expert EATER!!

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@Toyota_Aus beings excitement with pants, ON. :D #86for86hrs

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@MaadaN6 lol

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

The practitioner must be neutral and unbiased. Otherwise the outcome will not be fair. #ADRDV2

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

What process are you referring to? The process of separating the parties?

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

By 'reality check' I would mean to check whether their demands are ideal and fair. You can't expect to achieve a 100% asset grab. #ADRDV2

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

It would provide for the opportunity for a 'reality check'. So the parties can review their options. #ADRDV2

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Yes, conciliators can make suggestions #ADRCON

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

I conciliation, the third party is usually equipped with expert knowledge #ADRCON

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@willkleppsch hahahahahahaha! Dude!! xD

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Yes. RJ gives young first offenders a chance to repent and understand their actions have consequences. #ADRRS

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Also having only RJ removes some of the other benefits the court system provides for - retribution for the community. #ADRRS

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

No it can't. However I think it could compliment it for certain circumstances. #ADRRS

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Yes it is. It provides the opportunity to voice their concerns. #ADRRS

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@ADRUC2013 yes

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@itshoi test complete.

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Experiencing audio problems. #ADRRS

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@JadePartier omg jade, u r a tiger?!

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

Image test

[hou vann @itshoi]

#ADRDV eat

[Peter T @PeterT_UC]

@U3095664 why the hard hashtag name?