Peter Thomas

Free Enterprise technician.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

Change is urgently needed.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi Oh please, what's with the sudden outrage. We've had much bigger fish to fry these past years. There's our big anti-Israel case on behalf of Iran with the ICJ. There's BEE, Starlink, hosting the G20, cadre tenders for Covid and the party, Russia/Ukraine war, Trump, Afriforum...

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi Shem, does the truth hurt you so much.
SA could also do with some honest leadership and less BS, don't you think.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@WomenReadWomen A freak.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@Martin_ASFL Talk about cultural appropriation. Cape Town more aligned with the Khoisan and the European and their offspring if you ask me 🤣

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@dakkie1708 @JacoKleynhans MSM slowly making themselves less relevant day by day.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi Spoken likea true South African Bantu still smarting from apartheid and holding a grudge.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@JacoKleynhans If only SA could put its prejudices aside.

[Jaco Kleynhans @JacoKleynhans]

Voters in Armenia go to the polls today in a crucial general election. The newfound relationship between the country and the US is a central theme in the election. Here's a good analysis of why the US is getting involved in Armenia right now: "Trump’s Strategic Investment in Armenia Is Also a Win for America" https://t.co/Hl2nV5k06M

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@tholoana_m @EFFSouthAfrica @Julius_S_Malema You have no idea. So many retards like you, so little time.

[Jaco Kleynhans @JacoKleynhans]

“Why does antisemitism matter? Well, for the Jews, it’s obvious why it matters, but why should it matter to everyone else? It matters because when you look at what antisemites also hate, you find they hate everything that makes culturally rich, diverse, open societies possible. Real antisemites bring with them more than just their hatred of Jews: they bring censorship, political repression, conspiracy thinking, and the politics of dehumanization and scapegoating. So decrying antisemitism is not an act of special pleading. It is a defense of the moral and institutional architecture that makes free societies possible.”

https://t.co/oLc3RuHaSB

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@TheJaundicedEye Now it's going to cost them, and us sadly.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi @ParliamentofRSA Yes, because the current destructive and corrupt mindset among those elected to lead in Parliament is winning at the polls and creating growth and prosperity for all, lol.
How do we start thinking like winners, and not losers if we don't put our ignorance and prejudice aside.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@JacoKleynhans Meanwhile, ANC stepping in to try prevent the retrenchment of 22,000 PnP workers and the shuttering of what's left of our steel industry. Viva @MYANC Viva.

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi Love it 🤣

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@RediTlhabi Competition sucks ne 🤣

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

Video of Chinese communist security forces killing hundreds of protesting students on the Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 4th, 1989. 🇨🇳

[Peter Thomas @peterthomas661]

@morrislow123 GFY

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Wiltshire Police has been taken to court for marching under the Pride flag. Officers didn't simply attend a local event; they marched in uniform, wore trans-themed lanyards, and ran stalls under political banners. This was not policing. It was participation in an ideological campaign. And that distinction matters more than most people realise.

Because what's unfolding here is part of a toxic revolution that has spread through every British institution – one that preaches equality but demands obedience. What used to be the impartial machinery of state has been captured from within by a new orthodoxy: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion – the soft language of the hard Left.

This is how a nation is hollowed out. Not by riots or coups, but by bureaucrats with clipboards and slogans. It begins with the soft phrases – "be kind," "celebrate difference," "diversity is our strength" – the moral lullabies of a movement that masks coercion as compassion. Then come the symbols – rainbows painted across patrol cars, the oath replaced by the lanyard. And finally, the inversion: neutrality becomes "hate," disagreement becomes "extremism," and those who refuse to accept the creed are cast out as enemies of progress.

Pride has become the state's moral test. Refusal to affirm it is treated as heresy. When police forces sponsor Pride zones and hand out stickers, they aren't serving the community – they're serving the creed. They're telling every citizen with gender-critical, conservative, or religious beliefs that their views are now beneath protection.

Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology. Her challenge to Wiltshire Police is about more than one parade. It's about who governs Britain – the law, or the ideology that has replaced it. When judges have to remind police forces that impartiality is a legal duty, not a lifestyle choice, you know the system is rotting from within.

Every captured institution follows the same pattern: moral cause becomes policy, policy becomes dogma, and dogma becomes law. The NHS waves flags. The BBC manufactures narrative and calls it news. Our universities churn out zealots instead of thinkers. The police enforce feelings. A state once anchored in reason now runs on emotional coercion.

This is what capture looks like in the twenty-first century – not uniforms and salutes, but hashtags and training slides. It's control sold as compassion. And every time the police march under a political banner, the message is clear: allegiance to ideology now outranks allegiance to law.

The revolution happened in daylight. Most people mistook it for kindness. But behind the rainbows lies something colder – a bureaucracy that no longer serves the public, only itself.

It can still be undone, but only if the public stops apologising for wanting neutrality. The police have no business picking sides in moral crusades. Their badge should mean justice, not fashion. Because when the state kneels to ideology, the citizen kneels next.

"Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology."