peter wojcinski

[Tom the whistleblower @blowingtom2]

Haters gonna hate, but damn they are a great looking couple…..

[Bill Madden @maddenifico]

Trump raped a 13-year-old — which once again begs the question: Why hasn't this pedophile been removed from office?!!

[NOT a Canberra Bubbler 🌲🌏🌲 @MSMWatchdog2013]

The L-NP partisan angertainment hate machine

It's written all over its face every time it encounters a Labor politician

There's something seriously wrong at Stokes' @Channel7

Imagine what a vile, toxic, hate fuelled workplace it must be

Dog eat dog....

[Jeli 💉x 7 ….. VOTE YES ......... Schnauzer mum.❤️ @skyeliner]

Here is proof
Natalie Barr is clueless.
Didn’t even correct Hanson.
Why?!
It’s apparent neither of them know who pays for maternity leave…..
Barr is an uninformed disgrace.

[stranger @strangerous10]

For those who couldn’t hear Clare O’Neil after she sat quietly letting Cash speak only for Cash to scream over her entire answer while Barr let it happen - what O’Neil said is the 3 RW parties are all defending the status quo that govt is trying to fix

The show is a stitch up🙄

[BazzaCC @bazzacc2]

Looks like operation "Press Club" was a complete failure for Pauline....& opened many minds as to her shocking policies 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[Dirtyleftie @CraigSarg73]

The party that constantly rails against taxpayer waste is now facing serious questions about its own use of taxpayer money.

After the last federal election, One Nation received more than $6 million in public election funding.

Then the Australian Electoral Commission started asking questions.

According to documents obtained by The Guardian, the AEC queried 143 items in One Nation’s election funding claim, worth a combined $809,648.11.

That’s more than $800,000 in claimed electoral expenditure that was withdrawn after the AEC requested further information.

The AEC is also examining whether One Nation complied with electoral funding laws in relation to payments made to certain suppliers.

This isn’t about a missing receipt or a minor administrative error. These are significant questions involving hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer-funded election claims.

And it’s not the first time.

In 2021, Pauline Hanson signed an enforceable undertaking with the AEC after One Nation was overpaid $165,442.03 in election funding because some claimed expenses were found not to be electoral expenditure or had not actually been incurred.

Now there is another review.

Another funding claim.

And another round of questions.

Earlier reporting also showed One Nation received more than $6 million in public funding after the 2025 election, while its 160 candidates declared $872,116 in total electoral expenditure.

Australians deserve to know how public money is being claimed and spent.

If either Labor or the Coalition were facing this level of scrutiny over taxpayer-funded election claims, One Nation would be calling it a scandal.

When the questions are about One Nation’s own finances, the outrage seems to disappear.

This isn’t about politics.

It’s about accountability.

Public money should be subject to public scrutiny, regardless of which party receives it. And any party that campaigns on waste, integrity and accountability should be prepared to meet the same standard it demands of everyone else.

[BazzaCC @bazzacc2]

Murdoch Gutter Media 😡

[Jamie Bonkiewicz @JamieBonkiewicz]

Just a reminder that Trump raped a 13-year old child.

It’s on record.

[Sarrah Bellus @sarrah_bellus]

Bringing this back:
Rep. Ted Lieu says the full Epstein files contain information that Donald Trump RAPED minors.

Never stop speaking about Epstein.

[Just Your Average Punter @Your_Avg_Punter]

The hills are alive with….

[Old Man Lefty @OldManLefty1]

The Circle of Crime..

[💙 Dr. MemeNstein votes 💙 BLUE 🇺🇸🦅 @Coste1Costello]

🟥 BREAKING:

[Cheryl @chuerta1]

Boy do they have @FoxNews pegged.

[BehindThaGroove @KellyEekockopp]

86'ed