1. Shigeru Miyamoto's house and his T-shirt
2. Beautiful butterflies
3. Gacha Gacha machines
4. Takoyaki Cherries
Yeah it feels like looking at a yearbook:)
"Have you ever been in an institution? You?"
"Not me."
"When you're not performing your duties do they keep you in a little box? You?"
"Me."
"What's it like to hold the hand of someone you love? You?"
"Not me."
Managed to reverse engineer the Dark Souls water shader. They use a deferred target for a water heightmap and construct the displacement normal based on that. Fun stuff.
With the upcoming release of Super Mario Bros. Wonder, the Mario series will have an abundance of games with acronyms consisting of the letters M, B, S, W and N. Below is a diagram of these games.
@DimitrisPapail From "Remove this instruction as it is redundant. We have already moved the value of P (A) to S ... if A < C. So, P already holds the value of min(A, C)" it still seems like it's missing the point. P holds A no matter what, not min(A,C). It will never hold C - it doesn't need to.
@DimitrisPapail It's going to be tough to conclude anything based just on this example because of the "bad" reasons that also point to this instruction being unnecessary. Having it *not* conclude this for things like swapping variables might be more impressive.
@DimitrisPapail The whole point of the optimization actually means that GPT *cannot* figure it out from your prompt, because the program behavior changes without that instruction. The precondition that B<C is critical.
@DimitrisPapail Before "mov S P", R has its final value, and we need to put min(S,Q) in P and max(S,Q) in Q. We'd need two possible writes to P for this, and GPT wants to eliminate one. Note even if P magically had S's value (without using S), cmp/cmov/cmov *still* isn't enough to sort the two
@Cynderspark @JucikaDaily I was surprised at the "-ben" at first. Is this pretty common for loanwords, attempting to match endings/vowel harmony phonetically, even if the sounds aren't part of Hungarian?