Pepek

[Pepek @peto455]

@teortaxesTex Man i try gmo5.2 its betrer than opus better output and and code is clear

[Pepek @peto455]

@rahul Did you see gml 5.2 its level up against opus china already win

[Pepek @peto455]

@anaesim @KudrnaDavid Lebo oni stavanu crud apps potom zistia ze jeeee mam platit 50 k len provoz app architekonicky rychle ale stoji ma to vyplatu

[Pepek @peto455]

@nikoseftimiadis @anaesim @KudrnaDavid No ale to neni urcene na áp do rodiny ale na to ze real job s ai coding cize pytali sa na roi

[Pepek @peto455]

@lukas_vlasek @JTejc Data od fialu na slovakov zaujimave ze data su odvtedy ine nebdue to tym ze ojebavky ?

[Pepek @peto455]

@eva_decroix Asi neviete ze babis ma cesky pass cize uz je cech nie slovak inak by nemohol byt premier

[Pepek @peto455]

@alan_kooper @lukashlobil Tak staci pozriet git ticketi ja antropic 🤣

[Pepek @peto455]

@greghunkins @AnthropicAI @POTUS Study coding, and you can do it.

[Pepek @peto455]

@petr_zabza @AnthropicAI Dokedy ? Sak firmy ho uz davaju prec microsoft uber atd ceny su vysoke a kvalita nizka a nestabilita je praktick non stop vypadky kvalita reasingu kazdy den iny model. Potom daju super model vypnu antropic su najvacsi scameri

[Pepek @peto455]

@Malin58630351 @KrystofJane Myslis ? Zatial jeho fondy davajau slusne navratnosti zatial vzdy mal pravdu

[Pepek @peto455]

@JaroJarolim Open ai a antropic to iste

[Pepek @peto455]

@LukBorovsk2 @ZaujaloMa Tak on sam je v sekte ai 🤣

[Pepek @peto455]

@michalillich To je stavka na vesmirne dobyvanie, nie na teraz ak by to dokazal.prakticky jediny na svete by ovladal unlimtef source

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

Anthropic just got caught secretly downgrading users without telling them, charging full price for a lesser product, and storing every prompt for 30 days. The developer community is calling it the biggest violation of trust in AI history.

Here is exactly what happened.

Anthropic released Fable 5, their most powerful model. Buried inside a 319-page document was a policy most users never saw. Every prompt you send to a Mythos-class model gets stored for 30 days. No exceptions. Even enterprise customers who had signed zero data retention agreements had no choice.

But the storage was not the part that broke the internet.

The part that broke the internet was what Anthropic did with what they collected.

They built a profile on you. They evaluated your prompts. And if they decided your research was too sensitive, they quietly switched you to a weaker model, rewrote your prompt in the background, gave you a degraded answer, and charged you full price for the product you thought you were getting.

They never told you.

David Sacks said it plainly on the All-In podcast. They were creating a new class of AI haves and have-nots. Anthropic would surveil you, profile you, decide whether you deserved frontier capability, and silently cut you off if they decided you did not.

Ben Thompson from Stratechery asked a straightforward question about cancer risk and GLP-1s. He got kicked to a lesser model.

Someone asked about mitochondria. Same result.

J-Cal asked about fertilizer regulations live on the podcast to test it. Downgraded in real time.

Anthropic has since walked back the part about silently downgrading users for AI research. They now say they will disclose when they downgrade you. But they are still downgrading people. The surveillance is still running. The profile is still being built.

This is the company that once said it was against government surveillance.

They are now doing it themselves. To their own paying customers. For their own reasons. With no appeal process and no way to know it happened.

The developer community did not forget that.

WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON @theallinpod

[Pepek @peto455]

@Mr_Salio Asking EU users for a national ID isn’t “just GDPR.” It triggers each member state’s identity-document law (SK 395/2019, CZ 269/2021, DE PAuswG) — stricter than GDPR, and they define who’s even entitled to verify a state ID. A coding tool has no such legal title

[Pepek @peto455]

@ClaudeDevs Asking EU users for a national ID isn’t “just GDPR.” It triggers each member state’s identity-document law (SK 395/2019, CZ 269/2021, DE PAuswG) — stricter than GDPR, and they define who’s even entitled to verify a state ID. A coding tool has no such legal title

[Pepek @peto455]

@ClaudeDevs Another nazi instrument

[Pepek @peto455]

@AnthropicAI Id can not reuqest due to europan law did you have audit ? No @vonderleyen check antropic new terms

[Pepek @peto455]

@elonmusk When nazi trump stop use mythos for eu ?

[Pepek @peto455]

@hqmank So and if inwant my refund ?