Strategy has sold 3,588 $BTC for $216 million to fund dividends on our Digital Credit securities. As of 7/5/2026, we hodl ₿843,775 in our BTC Reserves and $2.55 billion in our USD Reserves. https://t.co/Cssgz29Psj
🚨CZ: “I DON’T UNDERSTAND STRC FULLY”
CZ says he took “multiple attempts” to understand Strategy’s $STRC, commenting it may be “too complex.”
He also said Bitcoin may not be the BEST asset for leverage because of its volatility, and that the market overreacted when Strategy sold BTC:
“At some point, he’s gotta sell some Bitcoin.”
Strategy announces a Digital Credit Capital Framework designed to strengthen Digital Credit, enhance liquidity, preserve long-term Bitcoin exposure, and support long-term value creation. $MSTR $STRC https://t.co/AUoUCtem53
You don't know about Polkadot's security issues, because they choose not to publish it, and sometimes, even try to actively shut down the advisories.
@kukabi_ discovered a Polkadot Hub stall which happened on June 12, 2026. 30 minutes downtime of Polkadot's main hub. 17 days later, no postmortem, no security advisories.
LOL Claude. What if the big courtroom plot twist turns out to be that the entire ponzi scheme was generated by the absolute bargain-bin free version of ChatGPT after someone face-planted into a bucket of crack
The Web3 Summit 2026 in Berlin just concluded, with around 900 attendees coming together to participate in creation of future tech;
Technology in which privacy is the default for practical tools that people will be able to use in everyday life.
Attendees used multiple proofs of concept open-sourced by @paritytech, published by the Polkadot Community Foundation (PCF) and stress-tested during W3S.
Read the full W3S wrap-up by PCF on the Polkadot Forum👇🏻
Whatever. The entire original idea of cryptocurrency has already been distorted by futures, ETF and yield ponzi. Never trust all these CZ, Saylor, BlackRock and etc ❌
CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?!
In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary @Binance founder @cz_binance suggested something big.
He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen.
He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.
The uncomfortable truth about $ETH:
The market is not stupid for refusing to price it like “ultrasound money.”
ETH staking yields roughly 3%.
You can get similar or better yield in cash/T-bills with way less volatility.
So if the entire ETH bull case is “stake it and earn yield,” that’s not enough.
The real question is:
Where does ETH capture value?
There are 6 answers:
Staking yield
This is the bond-like component. Useful, but not enough by itself.
Burn yield
EIP-1559 is supposed to act like a buyback.
But the burn only matters when Ethereum blockspace is expensive.
Low gas = low burn.
Low burn = weak ultrasound money narrative.
Settlement demand
Ethereum is still the settlement layer for DeFi, stablecoins, RWAs, L2s, and tokenized finance.
That is real.
But the market wants to know how much of that activity actually flows back to ETH.
Collateral demand
ETH is one of the deepest collateral assets in crypto.
DeFi, lending, restaking, liquidity, structured products — all of it uses ETH.
But collateral value only matters when demand is growing.
Scarcity
A lot of ETH is staked.
But locked supply alone does not make price go up.
You still need demand.
Appreciation
This is the biggest one.
ETH is a call option on Ethereum becoming the global settlement layer for crypto finance.
But right now, the market is saying:
“Cool story. Show me the fees. Show me the burn. Show me the flows.”
And this is why ETH has been punished.
Ethereum scaled with L2s.
That was the correct technical move.
But cheaper L2s also crushed the old fee-burn model.
Great for users.
Great for adoption.
Bad for short-term ETH value capture.
That’s the entire debate.
Ethereum is not dead.
But ETH holders need proof that the ecosystem’s value accrues back to the asset.
My framework:
If ETH is just a 3% staking asset, it is not cheap.
If ETH becomes the reserve collateral + settlement asset for onchain finance, it is massively mispriced.
That is why I am not all-in chasing.
But I do think this is a long-term accumulation zone.
Not because the yield is amazing.
Because the market is pricing ETH like value capture is permanently broken.
If that turns out wrong, the repricing will be violent.
The signal I’m watching:
ETH/BTC bottoming
ETF flows improving
L1 + blob fees recovering
Burn > issuance again
Stablecoins/RWAs growing on Ethereum
L2 activity feeding back into ETH demand
Until then, ETH is not a yield trade.
It is a value-capture trade.
And the market is making Ethereum prove it.
Humanity.
Developed and prototyped by Parity Tech.
Tested during the Web3 Summit and discussed by @KarimJDDA and @gavofyork in their talks.
It is a system with on-chain logic to anonymously prove that you are a human instead of a bot.
Not to identify you by date of birth and legal name.
Prove that you are human in a privacy preserving and decentralised way.
The former Greek finance minister, @yanisvaroufakis, has long argued that technology giants have accumulated unprecedented influence over digital systems, creating what he calls "technofeudalism."
Read more about what was discussed at the Web3 Summit here:
Polkadot outlook by @gavofyork live at the Web3 Summit in Berlin.
Web3 is not a progression of Web2.
These are two opposite approaches. Web2 solved social scale first, while Web3 solved economic functionality.
Polkadot Trinity is being built right now.
We do the hard work in the background, so the product developers don’t have to.
No logins. No install to start using. Comfortable and familiar interfaces. Coherence across devices. No crypto identifiers. No exposure to multiple selves. Mathematically guaranteed privacy and security.
Stay tuned.
Capital markets are funding the AI buildout at historic scale: ~$400B over 6 months. Bitcoin ETFs have seen ~$4B of outflows since May 14, pressuring $BTC. This is a capital rotation, not a Bitcoin impairment. Volatility creates opportunity.
Lo de Strategy NO TIENE BUENA PINTA.
Su precio promedio de compra en BITCOIN está en 75K$, están afrontando pérdidas y ayer realizaron su primera venta de $BTC de la historia.
Las élites buscan provocar un crash en Crypto para comprar BTC barato, y saben que Strategy es la clave, si fuerzan a la empresa a vender, BTC se irá mínimo a 20K$.