Twenty-five years of working with RNA taught one medical biochemist three things you should never do with it: modify it, stabilize it, or inject it. The mRNA COVID vaccine did all three, and I asked him to walk me through why that's important.
He described RNA as the blueprint of a cell, the instructions it uses to translate into proteins that do the actual work. If that blueprint is modified mid-construction, you don't get the protein you designed. You get fragments, and he said that's what is being produced in the majority of cases after the modification and injection of the spike protein RNA.
The greater danger is reverse transcription. When the RNA template persists in the cell long enough, it can be converted back into DNA. A cell with more DNA than it should have is something every physician recognizes. It's called aneuploidy, and it's a transformed cell. It's cancer.
He told me that, in his assessment as someone who has spent his career studying exactly this biology, the impact of all of this is beyond a disaster.
@grok, how can you accurately predict an election fraud rate when you have no idea of how many illegitimate votes have been cast? You only are counting the ones that have been caught. Without ID and citizenship verification and in person voting, there is no way to truly confirm that the person voting is who they say they are, let alone if they are an actual US citizen.
https://t.co/9qLdTfDDYa
💥 UNDER OATH, A DOCTOR MADE CLAIMS THAT DEMAND SCRUTINY.
Testifying before a Senate committee, Dr. Robert Sullivan drew a distinction between traditional vaccines and mRNA-based products, stating:
"The mRNA technology is not a vaccine, but an experimental genetic modification platform..."
He also testified that:
• The spike protein is biologically active and can be harmful.
• Researchers understood key risks from earlier SARS research years before COVID-19.
• Those risks should have been taken more seriously.
His most explosive exchange came when a senator asked whether officials already knew these issues.
Dr. Sullivan replied:
"They knew this."
These are significant claims made under oath. Whether they are ultimately supported or challenged by the broader body of scientific evidence, they deserve to be examined carefully—not ignored.
Watch the testimony. Read the evidence. Ask questions. That's how public trust is earned.
@SenRonJohnson
@TinMadDog26@MaryBowdenMD Problem is, once something like that is OTC, it isn’t regulated by your medical professional’s advice. Over use vs under use is a fine line with some things.
Not if intervention is delayed. Most treatment is after a bullseye or symptomatic fevers or joint pain. This is too late for doxy to properly work against Lyme. Doxycycline doesn’t work well intracellularly, doesn’t penetrate biofilms and doesn’t kill the encapsulated form of the bacteria.
There are many bacteria that have developed penicillin resistance: some staph and strep strains, gonorrea, to name a few. While overuse of antibiotics, poor diet and other factors induce immune dysregulation, you can’t wholly disregard bacterial resistance to antibiotics. It is the same as mice, rats and cockroaches becoming immune to certain poisons.
Whole stevia leaf was proven, in vitro, to be effective against Lyme also. Key with Lyme is to get it before it gets fully settled in. Start with a treatment regimen at the first sign of a tick bite, don’t wait for a bullseye (there are also other tick-borne infections to worry about too). Lyme uses biofilms, encapsulates, and hides intracellularly among other things. It is insidious once it gets established in a host.
@MaryBowdenMD Sarsaparilla for three months along with echinacea one week on, one week off for the same time worked for me. Everyone I know who did doxy or Zithromax had some form of extended or chronic Lyme infection.
Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America.
That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method.
And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him to stop it.
Think about what that means. Not content with blocking changes to the vaccine schedule, they are now going to court to prevent an investigation into whether the schedule is actually producing healthy children. The one question the entire program should have been answering for fifty years, and the people who run that program are fighting in federal court to make sure it never gets asked.
This is an industry protecting itself from its own data.
I am not accusing anyone in medicine of malice. I am saying that the long-term health investigation has never been done with the seriousness it deserves, and now that someone is finally trying to do it, there is a worldwide effort to shut it down before it starts.
We have to do this study. We have databases right now, like the Henry Ford Health database, that could give us real answers. Every database in this country should be opened to this investigation. The scientific method demands it. The health of our children demands it.
The only people who have something to fear from the truth are the ones fighting this hard to hide from it.
https://t.co/W04GZu2OZB
Then in 2011, state legislators passed a law that no retirees could receive a cost of living increase unless their pension system was at least 80% funded (some were before Whitman’s actions). Many retired NJ first responders haven’t seen a cost of living increase in almost two decades.