@TheKouk Your entire argument relies on the premise that money that is taxed is taken out of the economy.
Governments spend tax dollars (and then some) in the same economy that individuals do.
what if the AI creates/enables/unlocks new higher-paying jobs? by trying to prevent organizational evolution due to technology, you are limiting technology’s ability to create more value for workers.
if you had done this with the emergence of the tractor to protect loss of jobs on farms, we’d have very expensive food, no industrial revolution, and a shitty standard of living for workers. if you had done this with the emergence of the automobile, we’d have lost the economic explosion that arose from highways, lower cost transportation, and countless networked industries. if you had done this with the emergence of the computer and the internet, your entire district would still be based on an economy of oranges and plums.
humanity’s ability to compete, organize, and carry itself forward is a magical miracle. in every truly free society, tech evolution has improved the lives of absolutely everyone. in every society where a government stood up to create barriers and gates to tech evolution in the name of “workers rights”, standards of living went into a freefall.
your view is luddite at best and authoritarian at its heart. limiting freedom of choice, controlling the rights of workers and capital providers, is the core activity of socialism and will cause unbelievable unintended damage. well-intentiined, sure, but examining the consequences and n-th order effects, it’s clear how this model deeply harms workers, employment standards, wage growth etc.
i urge you to deeply study the social and economic history of technology evolutions, speak to folks in your district, and avoid the socialist trap the Dem party seems to be swirling into…
@QuentinDempster@sussanley Isn’t it better that politicians stick to their principles and have healthy disagreements, rather than fall in line with whatever their party leader decides at the time?
@realStevenWalk@clairlemon Being politically principled means you stick to your principles at the expense of switching sides, not stick with your side at the expense of your principles.
A good reminder that being an expert in one domain does not make you an expert in another. Apparently the economic principle of supply and demand is a myth when it comes to housing…