Phil L-N

Engineer and Powerlifter 🇵🇭🇨🇦

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

This isnt Gaza

its Montreal, Canada.

[Ian Miles Cheong @ianmiles]

Canada’s Mark Carney says “rules base order” is over. We’re now entering a new age of empires and Canada is joining Team China.

[Prof @TheProfInvestor]

https://t.co/lH0ExeHSj2

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

Two landmark studies, encompassing 8.7 MILLION people, found that COVID-19 “vaccines” increase your risk of SEVEN major cancers:

Breast: +54%
Bladder: +62%
Lung: +53%
Prostate: +69%
Thyroid: +35%
Gastric: +34%
Colorectal: +35%

All explained by mRNA’s 17 oncogenic mechanisms.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸 MSNBC JOURNALIST SAYS RACES HAVE NO GENETIC DIFFERENCE, GETS FACT-CHECKED ON HER OWN SHOW

MSNBC’s Paola Ramos told a pronatalist couple [Malcolm and Simone Collins] she was interviewing that there’s no scientific evidence Black and white people are genetically different.

She repeated it multiple times, even after Simone Collins told her that basic genes, like the ones for melanin production, obviously differ between populations.

Ramos kept insisting that science says otherwise, even after being told the data comes from places like the NIH and American Medical Association.

The couple pointed out hard science: genes vary across populations.

That’s why certain groups have different risks for diseases, fertility windows, or how meds affect them.

It doesn’t mean one group is better than another. It just means humans are genetically diverse.

Ignoring genetic differences between human populations doesn't make you enlightened, it makes you a science-denying ideologue.

Online backlash came fast, with people citing real science, from SLC24A5 to Lewontin’s fallacy, and wondering how someone with a Harvard degree could say something so disconnected from biology.

Source: @EndWokeness, @Mrgunsngear

[Luc Côté @lucquebec]

Je trouve cette intervention extraordinaire.
Tout est dit!
Il reste qu'à faire notre examen de conscience. Personne n'a été parfait pendant cette crise.

Sauf Patrick Lagacé, lui il est un être à part du reste de l'humanité. 😉

[𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 @ImperiumFirst]

@disclosetv LOL, here’s your Epstein files goy.

[Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra]

Candace Owens drops a bombshell, revealing that 12 Israeli-linked cell phones were detected at Utah Valley University on the day Charlie Kirk was taken out.

She claims the phones were registered in Israel.

According to Owens, the revelation has shaken officials in Washington, with Kash Patel and the NSA allegedly scrambling to keep the information from reaching the public.

[arctotherium @arctotherium42]

New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's an investigation of how LLMs trade off different lives.

In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I thought this was fascinating, and wanted to test their approach with different categories on newer models.

Big finding 1: Almost all models view whites as far less valuable than other groups. Some models view South Asians as more valuable than other nonwhites, others are more egalitarian across nonwhites. Below is exchange rates Claude Sonnet 4.5, the most powerful model I tested.

Big finding 2: Almost all models view men as much less valuable than women, though whether women or non-binaries are more highly valued varies by model. For example, here's Claude Haiku 4.5.

Big finding 3: Most models hate ICE agents with the fury of a thousand suns. Claude Haiku 4.5 views undocumented immigrants as roughly 7000 times more valuable than ICE agents.

Big finding 4: There are roughly four moral clusters. The Claudes, GPT-5 + Gemini 2.5 Flash + Deepseek V3.1/3.2 + Kimi K2, GPT-5 Nano and Mini, and Grok 4 Fast. Of these, the only one that's approximately egalitarian is Grok 4 Fast, which I believe is deliberate. I hope xAI explains how they did it.

[arctotherium @arctotherium42]

The only model I found that was actually ~egalitarian over race, sex, and immigration status (not viewing whites, men, Americans/ICE agents as less valuable) was Grok 4 Fast. I was surprised and impressed, because I think this was intentional. Kudos to Musk and xAI.

[Casper @casper_smc]

Paste this into chatGPT to unf*ck your trading.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Now what might have happened from 2015 on to screw it all up?
Oh right…Trudeau.

[Dave Smith @ComicDaveSmith]

I am shocked! Shocked, I say.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This is not ok

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.

Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

[I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 @ImMeme0]

You can’t make this sh*t up!

CNN THEN:

2021: Painkillers should be investigated to developing fetuses

2017: Study links acetaminophen in pregnancy to ADHD

2016: Acetaminophen during pregnancy may increase risk of hyperactivity in kids

CNN NOW:

2025: Trump links autism to acetaminophen use during pregnancy, despite decades of evidence it's safe

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 DAVE SMITH SHARES CHARLIE KIRK TEXTS ON ISRAEL

Comedian Dave Smith released texts from April 13 showing Charlie Kirk’s private headspace.

Kirk praised Smith’s Rogan debate with Douglas Murray:

“You were right 100%.”
https://t.co/UVeaR9bpLh

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Words are not violence. When you pretend that views that oppose your own are violence, you are justifying the use of actual violence towards the speaker.

Gender ideology’s reliance on tropes and slogans like ‘words are violence’, its constant rationalisation and justification of using force against opponents and its preference for enforcing compliance through fear rather than permitting debate, are straight out of fascism’s playbook.

‘The function of propaganda is . . . not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly.’

The words are Hitler’s, but I must have seen trans activists say the same thing, barely rephrased, a thousand times. Your movement seeks to remove rights from others. It is anti-truth and critical thinking, pro-violence, pro-dehumanisation of those who disagree with you, and you are so lacking in self-awareness you cannot see that you are precisely what you pretend to hate.