Article 5 does NOT require all nations to attack Russia. If you bother to read it, it says members must consult on the best way to help and each country decides what action to take . Also invocation of article 5 must be unanimous. Now ask yourself- will the US (or any other country) really risk mutual annihilation because Russia hit some targets in the UK? I suspect not. Sure, Article 5 was invoked against Afghanistan, but they couldn’t nuke anyone.
@dmaudsley@4Viewers@Channel4 My response;
Dear Charlotte,
Thankyou for your reply,
However I would prefer it if you read my email and answered the questions in it, rather than answering the questions you want to.
I’ll give you another go before I refer you to Offcom
We’ll see what comes back
So I asked channel 4 about the issues around lying to gain a supply of controlled drugs. They sent me the following generic reply, which didn’t address any of the questions asked.
(Also didn’t know we were on first name terms)
Dear Philip,
Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding The Great ADHD Myth?.
Whilst we appreciate your concerns please be assured that this documentary does not deny the lived experience of those diagnosed with ADHD or seeking diagnosis. Channel 4 takes its responsibilities in relation to impartiality seriously, and this programme falls within the Ofcom Guidelines.
Channel 4 has a remit to stimulate public debate and challenge the status quo, which includes offering a platform to a range of different views across the broadness of our slate. There is considerable public debate in this area and testing conventional thinking and exploring different ideas, as is the case with The ADHD Myth? Is a legitimate part of Channel 4’s remit. Channel 4 has also aired a number of other programmes on the topic of ADHD, which cover a variety of other viewpoints including: Do You Have ADHD?, Johnny Vegas: Art, ADHD & Me and Sam Thompson: Is This ADHD?”
However, please be assured that your comments have been noted and passed to the editorial team. Before and during production, the programme-makers met with a number of children living with an ADHD diagnosis and their families, alongside many and varied experts who expressed a range of views.
Thank you for taking the time to get in touch. We value all feedback from our viewers.
Kind Regards,
Charlotte Patton
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries
@Orla91@4Viewers@Channel4 Doesn’t really work that way. To get a diagnosis he must have told the diagnosing doctor that he had impairment- it’s a fundamental diagnostic requirement. Right before his assessment he said he wasn’t impaired. That means he lied.
Impairment assessment in children should rely heavily on collateral history as well as the individual perception of the child and the impression of the clinician. This is often provided as school reports, questionnaires and validated assessment tools- usually read before assessment, but I wasn’t there so don’t know. With adults it’s much more subjective, although collateral history is still sought. Certainly if an adult says “I’m not impaired” then they are not, and shouldn’t be diagnosed (they may have traits)
@dnky27 There was a fairly serious problem. He specifically said that he had no impairment prior to his ADHD assessment, yet he got a diagnosis- to be diagnosed requires significant impairments in two or more life domains. I think he needs to explain how that came about.
Max Blumenthal just exposed a shocking corruption of the British justice system. Six activists from Palestine Action went back to court after being acquitted in February. They had already served in prison, staged a hunger strike, and one attempted suicide under extremely harsh conditions. Now they face potential terrorist sentences.
But here's the kicker: the jury is not allowed to know about the "terrorist" designation. They're being led to believe they're ruling on simple criminal charges. If they convict, a biased judge — a former barrister for MI6 and the Metropolitan Police — can then sentence them as terrorists
The UK has become a police state for Israel
🇧🇾 Lukashenko on the lie of Western "human rights":
You bombed a school in a sovereign country thousands of kilometers away. How many lives have been lost because you encouraged bombings by Israel? What human rights are you talking about?
@elonmusk@farzyness I noticed you specifically mention the survival of consciousness; do you regard consciousness as a fundamental aspect of reality or do you see it as a product of the brain?
The same people that told you they were winning in Vietnam, that Saddam was about to attack you, that Afghanistan was a "Win" and that Biden was "Sharp as a tack"
Have told you Russia is the aggressor.
And that Ukraine is a Democracy?
They are liars.
@oasis@TicketmasterUK so pleased to see Oasis back after all this time; only to be ruined by a garbage website that didn’t work and cynical, exploitative pricing that the band must have explicitly agreed to. Seems someone’s lost touch with where they’re from. I’m out.