phillip

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@BasharInshasi .

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@davidrkadler .

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@BeckettUnite Good on those people risking their lives to feed the suffering.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@mhdksafa Awful 😞

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@arisaqz1 .

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@noor_supernova7 .

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@gomeshiro @archerships @juniorkingpp No, the real reason is algae is literally hundreds of times as efficient at photosynthesis. Plus all of the other things already mentioned here.

[Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 @tariqnasheed]

https://t.co/4w8xziNgGu

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@Byzantinerome @_Dj3d @ChineduHerbert_ He is also more right than wrong. The majority of the Mona Lisa's popularity is because it was stolen twice. It's not even Davinci's best portrait.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@segun_os_ @PhoenixRay__ The Mona Lisa wasn't even Davinci's best portrait. La Belle Ferronniere is a better painting and one davinci made before the Mona Lisa.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@Byzantinerome @_Dj3d @ChineduHerbert_ Christ the pantocrator in the Hagia Sophia. Predates davinci by a couple hundred years and is every bit as amazing as the Mona lisa.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@David32856757 @IDTHEFUTURE @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour Dude, you're just a bot that posts random studies in an attempt to overwhelm the conversation.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@IDTHEFUTURE @David32856757 @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour No, you're being intentionally dishonest. Actual peer review is only the beginning. Once it's reviewed and published, there are always scientists who take that and either try to find flaws or build on it for other research.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@hack86752329 @ProjectLincoln Yes and no, they can but they would be arrested and probably get jail time

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@IDTHEFUTURE @David32856757 @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour See that's how I know you're full of crap. Firstly the scientific community would love it if someone came out with evidence that disproved evolution. The scientific community is driven by people attempting to disprove established laws and known facts.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@IDTHEFUTURE @David32856757 @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour I actually went to your site and found what you call peer reviewed papers. Nothing in there is using actual science. You just make claims using the credentials of random people to back your random assertions.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@David32856757 @IDTHEFUTURE @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour For starters why would I accept any of these aren't lies. Various churches have been caught faking miracles forever. Show me actual evidence.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@IDTHEFUTURE @David32856757 @damnclown @StephenCMeyer @DrJamesTour You keep avoiding the topic. If it's possible to do with the things available without God intervening. which we know is possible. Plus given the time and mass of ingredients it's now far more likely it happened spontaneously than by any other method.

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@EVReach_ @BigRoho9999 @MAXGGSALT @CBM_Cringe The MCU literally told everyone who is supposed to replace iron man. Remember spiderman homecoming?

[phillip @phillipopfer]

@EVReach_ @MAXGGSALT @CBM_Cringe Even in the comics she wasn't the next iron man. Just because she uses a suit that she made that was inspired by iron man doesn't mean she is a replacement. By that logic so is war machine, and in the comics so is Rescue and iron spider.