@DrPaulOffit We already watched your policies for the last 4 years. Gain of function, natural immunity, mandated for-profit nanoparticles. America voted you out. You’re fired. Goodbye.
@JeromeAdamsMD A willingness to cause short-term damage to individuals in an effort to get approval from those who aim to cause long-term damage to society.
@timmers@JustinTrudeau Brags about eating unhealthy food? Check. Promotes coerced experimentation on those who unlike him, actually do take care of their bodies? Check. Thanks government for “taking control” when people refuse poorly-tested for-profit substance. Of course, it’s a modern day leftist.
@TardigradeJr @MileHighUp@DrEliDavid My point is that if you mess around with people's health (even for a noble reason like increasing your profit), you might not be happy with the long-term consequences of your strategy. I think the points stands, but let's see how this plays out.
@MileHighUp@DrEliDavid What better way to teach citizens about VAERS than to mandate for-profit synthetic nanoparticles that cause myocarditis on people that don't need or want them.
It only makes sense that the number of people opposing the technocracy will increase as people learn it's a thing.
@DrCanuckMD@healthbyjames I think we can all agree that it is up to those mandating a novel, poorly-studied technology to conclusively demonstrate that although the technology causes heart damage, the damage is "mild" & "transient."
Provide strong evidence for that, Canuck. We will take it from there.
@cliftonaduncan Because people can see that the system is corrupt, and that includes TRT, who just blocked me for posting age-stratified data from Israel & Switzerland. He is not seeking the truth. He seems to have a conflict of interest (connection with medicine) which may explain his behavior.
@thereal_truther@VisionarySteve@greg_travis@stkirsch "Age standardised". Who could possibly lower their standards to this abysmal level? There needs to be proper age STRATIFICATION.
Of course, prior health & selection bias need to also be considered. But even just looking at age (Israel, Switzerland), it's a whole new world.
@thereal_truther@ElijaDelwas I can name one country. It's the country that you just posted. For ages 0-30.
That's why when it comes to the ultimate test - the test of injecting innocent babies with the for-profit wuhan spike mRNA nanoparticles - only 2% of the population follows the pharma/gov't guidelines.
@thereal_truther@Troll11111B@dustycakes@ModelAyshaMirza When it comes to the most important thing (our babies), 98% of the country listened to those "grifters", and avoided the recommendations of the CDC, FDA, NIH and pharma, even with giants of ethics and intelligence like Walensky, Fauci, Gottlieb and Bourla running these entities.
The same group of people that insists they saved millions of lives in 2021, could only get 2% of the population to follow their recommendations when it comes to infants in 2022.
@thereal_truther - do you think this affects their credibility in any way?
https://t.co/fHeAixfxs7
@thereal_truther@Grinman@Rosewind2007@dfreedman7@crabb_vicki@AboutPediatrics Vaccines are the only chemicals injected (and often mandated) again & again & again into healthy developing children. With great power comes great responsibility, and no reasonable person could possibly trust Fauci, Bourla, Gottlieb and Walensky with their children's health now.