@nefertitillated@GidMK Thus you have: it has proven to some extent that the hypothesis is incorrect and the opposite of null is true. Which is ambiguous regarding that the null is that it doesn’t help and opposite is that it gains but it’s kinda pedantic utilization of language at that point.
@nefertitillated@GidMK This is literally science. we never say our hypothesis was proven correct we say we can reject the kill hypothesis. If your statistical significance isn’t robust enough to argue against the null (which is typically the direct opposite of the hypothesis)then you can’t reject it.
@shilosarah Big same. I had COVID and besides some pretty gnarly coughing I could basically move around and be fine. This flu- I was in bed for 3 days w/ just getting up to get water tiring me out. 0 appetite or energy. It was abysmal.
My angry plant breeding student plea to future authors of “Yield increase by [insert wild number] in X crop” studies:
Please verify your yield estimates in multi-environment trials in elite backgrounds. Yield in lab-optimized, unimproved lines means very little 14/
This won’t be the last time a paper like this is published. Keep an eye out for the sample size, yield estimates against commercial lines, and if these estimates are corrected for field-design/grain-moisture/etc…. 13/
I'm working on a new series of insect wing venation paintings. So far I've concentrated on Hymenoptera but I plan on doing a Diptera set next. They are a little wonky because drawing free hand with a bottle of goo is hard but I'm happy with the results.
I can't remember if I posted this collage on Twitter back when I first finished making it. This is my gall collage which contains galls from 4 different Disholcaspis species.