@thomasfbloom@ColmezPierre It is obvious, could say intuitive. Human math (notations and theorems) is that small set real whole math chosen for practical thing and what we have some capabilities to gasp, so intuitions work. More in "simpler" fields like you said.
@rnaferreira@Stephen1426397@OpenAI the trivial 8-dim cube projection into square grid, every 1024 edge on a 3x14 or 6x13 (3^2+14^2=6^2+13^2) diagonal. Maybe this arrangement meant to close enough the 912, general and simper, not only power of 2. With simulated annealing add some plus, but +64 surprisingly little
@rnaferreira@Stephen1426397@OpenAI ..cont.: "trivial" the n-dim cube projected keeping every edge length (you can do it extremely nice on a square grid every edge like the diagonal of a 3x4 rectangle)wiggling a little for other distances become the same length this +64 does not seem much..
@rnaferreira@Stephen1426397@OpenAI I don't get it. (Not important but the grid does not mean the unit length segments parallel the 2 grid direction but in the article they are 912 diagonals.) The left: the 1024 is trivial and shows the o(1) what maybe Erdős meant. the 1088 is the increment?
@ExoticSpice101 How? That keyboard meant not to use this at all? People buy worse and worse "shit" each year and they surprise one day get "liquid shit".
I want a keyboard that work if I spill "coffee" on it, but I cant because of people. I hate people.