MIBR's choice to play that ascent comp is exactly what I am talking about with teams really lacking in the team identity department / map theory department. You have amazing players and amazing coaches but at the end of the day that comp cannot accomplish control on attack at a fundamental level without major utility commitment, risk and telegraphing your every move. Choosing a comp with such a tangible downside would maybe make sense to play INTO your strengths or identity, but they chose this comp and it plays strongly against the team strengths and role comforts.
Nothing against the team, coaching staff, players etc. But this is a clear example of what I talked about in my previous post.
I miss when the 5 of us would be on the same car otw to the piano lessons. Dad is now happy up there and sis in German. Now its just me mom and stupid lil bro. Feels so empty lately. Yes I have alot of kind loving friends but somehow the loneliness is always there.
I’m not sure why this is even an argument or why people are being called sexist, anyone who watches Valorant would know how top GC teams compare to t2/collegiate male teams and the only GC player to actually reach t1 vct being biologically male. There’s a lot of talent in GC, but putting someone like Aspas against a top GC player isn’t even comparable and is avoiding reality.