Unacceptable Individualism

I don't think about my self. I think for myself.

Everyone has a story if you're willing to listen.

My father's nickname was Pinky. I am his offspring.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@LiveAncestral For many, the dream of becoming a professional is to feel superior to others:
https://t.co/DnE8xWSn3f

[Cary Kelly @CaryKelly11]

Doctor: You really should be eating more fish.

Me: No problem!

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@LiveAncestral No.

When they suggest cutting back, I increase my intake, partly out of spite.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@LiveAncestral I don't care if anyone thinks it's extreme. They're right.

It's extremely tasty and works for me!

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@JamieAA_Again Watching/listening to him recount his experience is painful. He just couldn't put it together.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

Crabs in a bucket.

It's said a crab bucket doesn't need a lid because when one 🦀 tries to get out, the others pull it down .

Why not help yourself first, so you can help others lift themselves up too?

[Curtis Stone @offgridstone]

I have noticed that many people today would rather spend their time trying to tear someone down they don't know and cannot effect, then spending their time trying to build up someone they do know and could effect. Themselves.

It says a lot about how many seek pointless pursuits, doing things that do nothing for themselves or others around them. It's almost like they've been programmed to be ineffective.

It's quite a thing to observe for the times we're in. A time when people are needed more than ever to stand up and claim what's theirs, they make futile attempts to tear down others who cannot be torn down.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@CaryKelly11 The best beef is the best beef one can afford. But I agree about the fat content. ✌🏻

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@offgridstone The signs of what was happening were all around but I was not in a great position in 2020.

I've built so I can work within the current System, but I'm in a better place to work within a new one.
https://t.co/HOc6aIhIsK

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

⚽ is considered to be the World's sport. Maybe so. But one thing millions of Plebs seem to enjoy more is whinging.

I've whinged at a world-class level. But since Rona(alleged), I've chosen gratitude and building.

We all have choices. Always have. Always will. ✌🏻

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

⚽ is considered to be the World's sport. Maybe so. But one thing millions of Plebs seem to enjoy more is whinging.

I've whinged at a world-class level. But since Rona(alleged), I've chosen gratitude and building.

We all have choices. Always have. Always will. ✌🏻

[Greg @greg_scott84]

@yegwave @happyfinko

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@Tuluminati888 Not to mention fear the country & wilderness areas.

We already know of plans like Agenda 21 (21st Century) , Megaregions of America etcetera, etcetera.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@UScrimeReview @CFoxtrot52 @redpillb0t

[Faisad Akhubar @akhubar]

@Loathing1984 @RealAndyLeeShow I’ve heard it called the ‘AWFUL savior complex.’

Affluent white female urban liberal.

[T𝖚𝖑𝖚𝖒𝖎𝖓⩜⃝𝖙𝖎✨ @Tuluminati888]

⚠️Flintstones vitamins were my gateway supplement...

Sounds ridiculous until you realize that was the whole playbook.

Get the child early.

Make the synthetic nutrient tablet look like a cartoon. Make it sweet. Make it colourful. Make it chewable. Put it beside cereal, orange juice, low-fat milk and all the other “healthy breakfast” theatre from the same era.

Nobody questions it because it looks innocent.

It’s for kids.
It’s cute.
It’s responsible.
It’s what good parents do.

Meanwhile the child is learning the first lesson of modern nutrition:

Food is not enough.
Nature is incomplete.
The body is missing something.
Health comes from a product.

A lab-made tablet can fill in what real nourishment supposedly failed to provide.

That is a powerful spell to install before a kid even understands what food is.

And once that idea gets planted, the adult version becomes easy to sell.

First the cartoon vitamin. Then the fortified cereal. Then the gummy C. Then the synthetic D. Then the B complex. Then the multivitamin. Then the “immune support.” Then the methylation stack. Then the longevity cabinet full of expensive little bottles pretending to be wisdom.

Same programming.

Older customer.

Bigger invoice.

I know because I lived it...

Years of synthetic vitamin abuse dressed up as discipline. Years of thinking more capsules meant more health. More powders. More tablets. More “support.” More isolated compounds. More labels promising to correct the body while the foundation stayed broken.

Minerals depleted.
Sunlight missing.
Sleep wrecked.
Real food replaced.
Salt feared.
Water dead.
Terrain ignored.

But the supplement cupboard looked impressive, almost like a supplement aisle or store, so I thought I was doing something.

That is how deep the conditioning goes...

And this is why I don’t see children’s vitamins as harmless little health products.

I see onboarding.

A child gets trained to trust the synthetic replica before they trust food, sunlight, minerals, salt, water, sleep, movement and the body’s own intelligence.

They learn the cartoon version of nutrition first.

Then spend decades trying to unlearn it.

Synthetic vitamins are not nourishment.

They are industrial isolates dressed up as care.

And when you put them in cartoon form and feed them to children, you are not just selling a supplement.

You are creating the next generation of customers who will grow up believing nature always needs a chemical backup plan.

Looking back, the cartoon bottle was not harmless.

It was the first dose of the belief system...

[Vinnie Tortorich @VinnieTortorich]

Nina Teicholz was a New York journalist on a strict low-fat vegetarian diet that was not really working.

Then a magazine sent her to review fancy restaurants in Manhattan. For the first time in her adult life she ate full-fat meat, butter, and cream. She felt better. Sharper. Steadier. And the weight she had been fighting for years started falling off.

So she did what a good journalist does. She started asking where the war on fat actually came from.

Nine years of research. Hundreds of interviews. Every major diet-heart study reread.

In 2014 she published The Big Fat Surprise. The conclusion was simple. The case against saturated fat had never actually been made. It had been assumed, then defended.

In September 2015 the BMJ ran her investigation of the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Cherry-picked studies. Ignored randomized trials. Members with food and pharmaceutical funding. The committee had recommended a diet that no trial had ever shown to be safe or effective long-term.

The counterattack arrived in six weeks.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest organized a letter signed by more than 180 scientists demanding the BMJ retract her paper. The letter claimed eleven factual errors.

The BMJ did not retract.

They commissioned a year of external expert review. They corrected seven smaller technical points. They left her central thesis untouched. In December 2016 they confirmed the paper stands.

Teicholz pointed out something else in her response. Many of the 180 signatories had taken funding from the food and pharmaceutical industries she had criticized.

Since the book, study after study has confirmed her thesis. PURE. FASTER. The reanalyzed Minnesota Coronary Experiment. The official guidelines are quietly walking back their fat warnings without ever admitting why.

One reporter forced a peer-reviewed journal to publicly choose between her data and the establishment that funded the consensus.

When the establishment cannot refute you, they try to silence you.

It did not work.

#NSNG #NinaTeicholz #BigFatSurprise #BMJ #SaturatedFat #DietaryGuidelines #LowFat

[strong_roots @guydoe2022]

"The [ordinary] doctors themselves have no intention to kill you, they simply operate on an algorithm written by the empire, which does want to kill you, slowly..."

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

Self-bump.

Be retarded and give your power away, if you wish. Or don't. I don't care.

You need to save yourself.

A politician never will.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@ryangerritsen I agree with you.

While I don't like any politician - none - to obsess over an individual you've never met is absurd to me.

Most only regurgitate media propaganda and have never tried to understand the counter-narrative to their delusions/bias.

[Unacceptable Individualism @pinkysoffspring]

@ryangerritsen I agree with you.

While I don't like any politician - none - to obsess over an individual you've never met is absurd to me.

Most only regurgitate media propaganda and have never tried to understand the counter-narrative to their delusions/bias.

[Mimi @mimikmorgan]

People get so attached to what they cannot do that they stop looking at what they can.

I see it every day.

Cannot go barefoot. Cannot walk a block. Cannot lift weights. Cannot do what they used to do.

And in that cannot, everything stops.

Here is what I know from my own experience and after working with people living with Parkinson's, RA, MS and chronic illness.

The cannot is rarely the whole truth. It is usually the loudest voice in the room.

What can you do today? Not yesterday. Not before the diagnosis.

Today.

Can you take one step? Take it.
Can you wiggle your toes? Do it.
Can you stand for 30 seconds? Stand.

The brain responds to what you give it. Not to what you withhold from it.

Stop negotiating with cannot. Start building with can.

Just 10 more steps. Always. 🤍

[Karen Hunt aka KH Mezek @karenalainehunt]

Drug taken by millions found to increase dementia risk by 33 per cent.

Anyone who blindly says, “Trust the science” hasn’t done any research on how often “the science” has been wrong. Or how often corrupt companies pay scientists and institutions millions of dollars, so their studies get results the companies paid for. They then laud “the science” and no one dares contradict them.

Proton pump inhibitor drugs for acid reflux have also been linked to higher risk of stroke, broken bones and kidney disease.