KH

[KH @pintsizeox]

Goal posts are a fixed physical line, the whole ball either crosses or it doesn’t. Offside has always been about meaningful advantage and positioning at the moment of the pass. A toe or shoulder doesn’t create advantage in any real on-pitch sense. The two rules aren’t the same animal. One rewards geometry, the other should still feel like a game.

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ThankYouNewJoe @RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman Have you played soccer?

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ThankYouNewJoe @RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman I imagine it would allow the game to be played with less worry about a toe being ahead. If it’s blatant, that’s one thing.. if it’s a toe, elbow, forehead etc, that’s another. Have you played soccer?

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ThankYouNewJoe @RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman Because it is a sport played by humans? Again, it’s just my opinion on the matter.

[KH @pintsizeox]

@CLT_Exam In my public education experience, I only read Shakespeare from that list—only two texts. I’m thankful to have pursued education beyond high school and hope to help the next generation tackle that list and more.

[KH @pintsizeox]

@manupla88 @AugursNFT Solid point

[KH @pintsizeox]

@HDThoreau11 @AugursNFT I like that. I think another person who commented about having different zones.

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ThankYouNewJoe @RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman To add a bit of human back into it?

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ThankYouNewJoe @RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman I think there needs to be a margin of error. I think to be human is very gray. I think that needs to be accounted for. Intent is the key, in my opinion

[KH @pintsizeox]

@asandu @TaylorTwellman Probably. I’m not saying my idea is the correct way. Just proposing that it needs to be more than a toe

[Kevin Albrecht @kevinpalbrecht]

The text of the first scroll, PHerc. 166, the first unrolled Herculaneum Scroll, is now live for anyone to read in the original Ancient Greek on Kevilex: https://t.co/A8Zqufc0rp

[KH @pintsizeox]

@ScouseDev @AugursNFT

[KH @pintsizeox]

@PaulMacdFC @DefensePolitics @AugursNFT Can you expand please?

[KH @pintsizeox]

@RavenAkaFProof @momolach5 @TaylorTwellman I understand, a toe just seems ridiculous to me - just my humble opinion

[KH @pintsizeox]

@DefensePolitics @AugursNFT There is no scenario where everyone will be happy

[KH @pintsizeox]

@DefensePolitics @AugursNFT I’m fine with it being computerized, just think there should be a margin for human error

[KH @pintsizeox]

@BlueHeronTrades @TaylorTwellman I think there should be an allotment for sheer human error if we are using machine to judge a toe

[KH @pintsizeox]

@BlueHeronTrades @TaylorTwellman It allows for it to be a more blatant movement as opposed to not noticing a toe or shoulder that is slightly ahead. All that I know is that I know nothing. It’s only my humble opinion

[KH @pintsizeox]

@darylh689 @TaylorTwellman Cool beans. I’m just thinking out loud here.

I personally don’t see how a toe is that much of an advantage. I think if we are going to use tech to help make these calls, I just think we should revisit what a blatant offsides/ advantage is. All that I know is that I know nothing

[KH @pintsizeox]

@FormerylNurgle @AugursNFT If we are using computers to calculate already, why not adjust the rule so it is a more blatant offside? I don’t see how a toe gives that much advantage. That’s why I think it should be something more. All that I know is that I know nothing