![jake2b's tweet photo. what if the ace up the sleeve for $GME is not about the actual acquisition, but what happens after the acquisition? what if it is Delaware Law Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter IX. Merger, Consolidation or Conversion.
specifically §251(g)?
like many I was surprised to see RC doing the media tour and for the first time, hyping how big their plans will be. I mentioned before that a likely explanation could be they are doing a roadshow for an upcoming traditional bond offering. I also couldn’t help but worry when I read some snippets:
“it's gonna be really big. Really big. Very, very, very big," Cohen said of the size of the acquisition.”
“this is something that really has never been done before within the history of the capital markets.”
“it has the "potential to make [GameStop] worth several hundreds of billions of dollars.”
..because no matter what the Board was planning, the market could make this the largest sell-the-news event in history to try and curb their momentum and sentiment around the pivot of GameStop into a holding company.
why would big dog do that? why would he not say basically anything for 5 years then suddenly risk shooting himself in the foot by making grandiose claims about their first acquisition? lets not overlook that in the CNBC article he claims this one acquisition could propel the market cap of the company to the extent his entire pay package vests..
it got me thinking about why he would be so confident. then I found §251(g):
“Delaware General Corporation Law Section 251(g) allows a corporation to reorganize into a holding company structure without requiring a stockholder vote. This statutory provision facilitates mergers with a wholly-owned subsidiary, ensuring the holding company has the same charter provisions as the original corporation, often used for corporate restructuring or, historically, for adopting anti-takeover measures.”
emphasis mine. it is mainly used to create a new, top-level holding company where the original parent corporation used to be. That old parent co becomes a subsidiary and shareholders receive identical shares in the new holding company.
“Section 251(g) facilitates a holding company reorganization merger where outstanding shares of the original corporation are automatically converted into equivalent shares of the new holding company upon the merger’s effective time, provided all statutory conditions are met (e.g., identical rights and no tax recognition). This conversion is seamless and does not require surrendering or recalling physical certificates or shares,..”
hang on.. I know exactly what I thought of when I read that. do you remember this?
this sure provides a convenient explanation. oh, I can already hear the naysayers.. upon the merger's effective time. do you now remember what happened immediately before September 2024? the Board closed their credit facility and less than one month later, a pre-negotiated, pre-settled agreement was filed by the FTC.
I wrote at the time that I believed the Company applied to the FTC for a pre-merger certificate, hence why the settlement came out when it did and that the issuance of the certificate occurred after the second, 30-day review period following the filing of RC's settlement of the FTC violation. that is why he tweeted "yolo" exactly 60 days after the application for the certificate, because he got it.
OK back on topic. guess what else?
if they want to, a company can reissue shares under §251(g) as tokenized shares even if they weren’t tokenized before, as long as the tokenized shares are identical in all the important respects like rights, voting powers, etc. to the original shares. this is explained in §251(g)(2).
“Since §251(g) allows for a holding company reorganization where the new parent issues shares that mirror the originals, the holding company can adopt a blockchain-based stock ledger for its issuance process. This doesn’t violate the “identical” requirement because the form of record-keeping (traditional vs. blockchain) is administrative, not substantive—much like switching from certificated to uncertificated shares, which Delaware law expressly supports.”
hang on now.. do you remember the S-3 that was filed in May 2024, defining digital assets inside of the sale agreement contract between GME and Jefferies? for their share offering?
GameStop’s current corporate structure looks like this: GameStop Corp (parent) holding company → GameStop Inc (subsidiary) that manages retail operations. the shares are issued for ownership of the parent company. important to understand that the legacy business is managed by a subsidiary.
what if in the future GameStop wanted to maintain the brand identity for their retail business as the premier destination for how to spend your leisure time, but wanted to have a new name for their investment behemoth diversified holding company.. like Teddy?
they could:
• acquire a company that they find undervalued or owning an asset they would want;
• place it as a subsidiary of GameStop Corp;
• perform a Section 251(g) corporate reorganization;
• and name it whatever they want.
then it becomes Teddy (probably) → GameStop Corp → GameStop Inc.
you may be wondering why? ..well, tell me why shares of GME were labelled new class in 2024? kidding aside, this allows GameStop Corp to keep its current roles: strategic oversight, capital allocation, governance.. the investment policy.., and allows a new parent corporation to be formed to hold all of the acquisitions made by a dying, brick and mortar retailer-turned-investment fortress, managed by big dog and friends. and! it does not require a shareholder vote.
that could explain Section 4 of the warrant agreement, specifically why they chose to include legal definitions around a “Share Exchange Event” in the event of a reorganization:
it would explain the “new class” anomaly observed in September 2024 (or it was a private placement);
it would explain why the ATM agreement would require GME and Jefferies to have explained digital assets in a contract only to do with selling of their shares;
and lastly, it could explain why RC is so confident in his interviews with the news media.
talk about exciting times.
n.b.—this is just my personal opinion and fun speculation.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HAQNxnxXkAAqAtk.jpg)
![jake2b's tweet photo. what if the ace up the sleeve for $GME is not about the actual acquisition, but what happens after the acquisition? what if it is Delaware Law Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter IX. Merger, Consolidation or Conversion.
specifically §251(g)?
like many I was surprised to see RC doing the media tour and for the first time, hyping how big their plans will be. I mentioned before that a likely explanation could be they are doing a roadshow for an upcoming traditional bond offering. I also couldn’t help but worry when I read some snippets:
“it's gonna be really big. Really big. Very, very, very big," Cohen said of the size of the acquisition.”
“this is something that really has never been done before within the history of the capital markets.”
“it has the "potential to make [GameStop] worth several hundreds of billions of dollars.”
..because no matter what the Board was planning, the market could make this the largest sell-the-news event in history to try and curb their momentum and sentiment around the pivot of GameStop into a holding company.
why would big dog do that? why would he not say basically anything for 5 years then suddenly risk shooting himself in the foot by making grandiose claims about their first acquisition? lets not overlook that in the CNBC article he claims this one acquisition could propel the market cap of the company to the extent his entire pay package vests..
it got me thinking about why he would be so confident. then I found §251(g):
“Delaware General Corporation Law Section 251(g) allows a corporation to reorganize into a holding company structure without requiring a stockholder vote. This statutory provision facilitates mergers with a wholly-owned subsidiary, ensuring the holding company has the same charter provisions as the original corporation, often used for corporate restructuring or, historically, for adopting anti-takeover measures.”
emphasis mine. it is mainly used to create a new, top-level holding company where the original parent corporation used to be. That old parent co becomes a subsidiary and shareholders receive identical shares in the new holding company.
“Section 251(g) facilitates a holding company reorganization merger where outstanding shares of the original corporation are automatically converted into equivalent shares of the new holding company upon the merger’s effective time, provided all statutory conditions are met (e.g., identical rights and no tax recognition). This conversion is seamless and does not require surrendering or recalling physical certificates or shares,..”
hang on.. I know exactly what I thought of when I read that. do you remember this?
this sure provides a convenient explanation. oh, I can already hear the naysayers.. upon the merger's effective time. do you now remember what happened immediately before September 2024? the Board closed their credit facility and less than one month later, a pre-negotiated, pre-settled agreement was filed by the FTC.
I wrote at the time that I believed the Company applied to the FTC for a pre-merger certificate, hence why the settlement came out when it did and that the issuance of the certificate occurred after the second, 30-day review period following the filing of RC's settlement of the FTC violation. that is why he tweeted "yolo" exactly 60 days after the application for the certificate, because he got it.
OK back on topic. guess what else?
if they want to, a company can reissue shares under §251(g) as tokenized shares even if they weren’t tokenized before, as long as the tokenized shares are identical in all the important respects like rights, voting powers, etc. to the original shares. this is explained in §251(g)(2).
“Since §251(g) allows for a holding company reorganization where the new parent issues shares that mirror the originals, the holding company can adopt a blockchain-based stock ledger for its issuance process. This doesn’t violate the “identical” requirement because the form of record-keeping (traditional vs. blockchain) is administrative, not substantive—much like switching from certificated to uncertificated shares, which Delaware law expressly supports.”
hang on now.. do you remember the S-3 that was filed in May 2024, defining digital assets inside of the sale agreement contract between GME and Jefferies? for their share offering?
GameStop’s current corporate structure looks like this: GameStop Corp (parent) holding company → GameStop Inc (subsidiary) that manages retail operations. the shares are issued for ownership of the parent company. important to understand that the legacy business is managed by a subsidiary.
what if in the future GameStop wanted to maintain the brand identity for their retail business as the premier destination for how to spend your leisure time, but wanted to have a new name for their investment behemoth diversified holding company.. like Teddy?
they could:
• acquire a company that they find undervalued or owning an asset they would want;
• place it as a subsidiary of GameStop Corp;
• perform a Section 251(g) corporate reorganization;
• and name it whatever they want.
then it becomes Teddy (probably) → GameStop Corp → GameStop Inc.
you may be wondering why? ..well, tell me why shares of GME were labelled new class in 2024? kidding aside, this allows GameStop Corp to keep its current roles: strategic oversight, capital allocation, governance.. the investment policy.., and allows a new parent corporation to be formed to hold all of the acquisitions made by a dying, brick and mortar retailer-turned-investment fortress, managed by big dog and friends. and! it does not require a shareholder vote.
that could explain Section 4 of the warrant agreement, specifically why they chose to include legal definitions around a “Share Exchange Event” in the event of a reorganization:
it would explain the “new class” anomaly observed in September 2024 (or it was a private placement);
it would explain why the ATM agreement would require GME and Jefferies to have explained digital assets in a contract only to do with selling of their shares;
and lastly, it could explain why RC is so confident in his interviews with the news media.
talk about exciting times.
n.b.—this is just my personal opinion and fun speculation.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HAQNxnvWIAA3DqV.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Devon Pitts
@PittsDevon
Lucedale, MS
Joined June 2014
810 Following
486 Followers
1K Posts
CAME FROM THE BOTTOM…
@MrBeast If anyone outside the United States figures it out, I will sign a contract or whatever it takes to gurantee you get 50% of the Million. Let’s help each other!!
@m74ft1 I live in the US and literally tell everyone I know and work with they should buy GME! This would be sick to add to my collection as I just started collecting sports cards just a few months ago!
@StockOptions888 Liked and following and got notifications on!
what if the ace up the sleeve for $GME is not about the actual acquisition, but what happens after the acquisition? what if it is Delaware Law Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter IX. Merger, Consolidation or Conversion.
specifically §251(g)?
like many I was surprised to see RC doing the media tour and for the first time, hyping how big their plans will be. I mentioned before that a likely explanation could be they are doing a roadshow for an upcoming traditional bond offering. I also couldn’t help but worry when I read some snippets:
“it's gonna be really big. Really big. Very, very, very big," Cohen said of the size of the acquisition.”
“this is something that really has never been done before within the history of the capital markets.”
“it has the "potential to make [GameStop] worth several hundreds of billions of dollars.”
..because no matter what the Board was planning, the market could make this the largest sell-the-news event in history to try and curb their momentum and sentiment around the pivot of GameStop into a holding company.
why would big dog do that? why would he not say basically anything for 5 years then suddenly risk shooting himself in the foot by making grandiose claims about their first acquisition? lets not overlook that in the CNBC article he claims this one acquisition could propel the market cap of the company to the extent his entire pay package vests..
it got me thinking about why he would be so confident. then I found §251(g):
“Delaware General Corporation Law Section 251(g) allows a corporation to reorganize into a holding company structure without requiring a stockholder vote. This statutory provision facilitates mergers with a wholly-owned subsidiary, ensuring the holding company has the same charter provisions as the original corporation, often used for corporate restructuring or, historically, for adopting anti-takeover measures.”
emphasis mine. it is mainly used to create a new, top-level holding company where the original parent corporation used to be. That old parent co becomes a subsidiary and shareholders receive identical shares in the new holding company.
“Section 251(g) facilitates a holding company reorganization merger where outstanding shares of the original corporation are automatically converted into equivalent shares of the new holding company upon the merger’s effective time, provided all statutory conditions are met (e.g., identical rights and no tax recognition). This conversion is seamless and does not require surrendering or recalling physical certificates or shares,..”
hang on.. I know exactly what I thought of when I read that. do you remember this?
this sure provides a convenient explanation. oh, I can already hear the naysayers.. upon the merger's effective time. do you now remember what happened immediately before September 2024? the Board closed their credit facility and less than one month later, a pre-negotiated, pre-settled agreement was filed by the FTC.
I wrote at the time that I believed the Company applied to the FTC for a pre-merger certificate, hence why the settlement came out when it did and that the issuance of the certificate occurred after the second, 30-day review period following the filing of RC's settlement of the FTC violation. that is why he tweeted "yolo" exactly 60 days after the application for the certificate, because he got it.
OK back on topic. guess what else?
if they want to, a company can reissue shares under §251(g) as tokenized shares even if they weren’t tokenized before, as long as the tokenized shares are identical in all the important respects like rights, voting powers, etc. to the original shares. this is explained in §251(g)(2).
“Since §251(g) allows for a holding company reorganization where the new parent issues shares that mirror the originals, the holding company can adopt a blockchain-based stock ledger for its issuance process. This doesn’t violate the “identical” requirement because the form of record-keeping (traditional vs. blockchain) is administrative, not substantive—much like switching from certificated to uncertificated shares, which Delaware law expressly supports.”
hang on now.. do you remember the S-3 that was filed in May 2024, defining digital assets inside of the sale agreement contract between GME and Jefferies? for their share offering?
GameStop’s current corporate structure looks like this: GameStop Corp (parent) holding company → GameStop Inc (subsidiary) that manages retail operations. the shares are issued for ownership of the parent company. important to understand that the legacy business is managed by a subsidiary.
what if in the future GameStop wanted to maintain the brand identity for their retail business as the premier destination for how to spend your leisure time, but wanted to have a new name for their investment behemoth diversified holding company.. like Teddy?
they could:
• acquire a company that they find undervalued or owning an asset they would want;
• place it as a subsidiary of GameStop Corp;
• perform a Section 251(g) corporate reorganization;
• and name it whatever they want.
then it becomes Teddy (probably) → GameStop Corp → GameStop Inc.
you may be wondering why? ..well, tell me why shares of GME were labelled new class in 2024? kidding aside, this allows GameStop Corp to keep its current roles: strategic oversight, capital allocation, governance.. the investment policy.., and allows a new parent corporation to be formed to hold all of the acquisitions made by a dying, brick and mortar retailer-turned-investment fortress, managed by big dog and friends. and! it does not require a shareholder vote.
that could explain Section 4 of the warrant agreement, specifically why they chose to include legal definitions around a “Share Exchange Event” in the event of a reorganization:
it would explain the “new class” anomaly observed in September 2024 (or it was a private placement);
it would explain why the ATM agreement would require GME and Jefferies to have explained digital assets in a contract only to do with selling of their shares;
and lastly, it could explain why RC is so confident in his interviews with the news media.
talk about exciting times.
n.b.—this is just my personal opinion and fun speculation.
![jake2b's tweet photo. what if the ace up the sleeve for $GME is not about the actual acquisition, but what happens after the acquisition? what if it is Delaware Law Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter IX. Merger, Consolidation or Conversion.
specifically §251(g)?
like many I was surprised to see RC doing the media tour and for the first time, hyping how big their plans will be. I mentioned before that a likely explanation could be they are doing a roadshow for an upcoming traditional bond offering. I also couldn’t help but worry when I read some snippets:
“it's gonna be really big. Really big. Very, very, very big," Cohen said of the size of the acquisition.”
“this is something that really has never been done before within the history of the capital markets.”
“it has the "potential to make [GameStop] worth several hundreds of billions of dollars.”
..because no matter what the Board was planning, the market could make this the largest sell-the-news event in history to try and curb their momentum and sentiment around the pivot of GameStop into a holding company.
why would big dog do that? why would he not say basically anything for 5 years then suddenly risk shooting himself in the foot by making grandiose claims about their first acquisition? lets not overlook that in the CNBC article he claims this one acquisition could propel the market cap of the company to the extent his entire pay package vests..
it got me thinking about why he would be so confident. then I found §251(g):
“Delaware General Corporation Law Section 251(g) allows a corporation to reorganize into a holding company structure without requiring a stockholder vote. This statutory provision facilitates mergers with a wholly-owned subsidiary, ensuring the holding company has the same charter provisions as the original corporation, often used for corporate restructuring or, historically, for adopting anti-takeover measures.”
emphasis mine. it is mainly used to create a new, top-level holding company where the original parent corporation used to be. That old parent co becomes a subsidiary and shareholders receive identical shares in the new holding company.
“Section 251(g) facilitates a holding company reorganization merger where outstanding shares of the original corporation are automatically converted into equivalent shares of the new holding company upon the merger’s effective time, provided all statutory conditions are met (e.g., identical rights and no tax recognition). This conversion is seamless and does not require surrendering or recalling physical certificates or shares,..”
hang on.. I know exactly what I thought of when I read that. do you remember this?
this sure provides a convenient explanation. oh, I can already hear the naysayers.. upon the merger's effective time. do you now remember what happened immediately before September 2024? the Board closed their credit facility and less than one month later, a pre-negotiated, pre-settled agreement was filed by the FTC.
I wrote at the time that I believed the Company applied to the FTC for a pre-merger certificate, hence why the settlement came out when it did and that the issuance of the certificate occurred after the second, 30-day review period following the filing of RC's settlement of the FTC violation. that is why he tweeted "yolo" exactly 60 days after the application for the certificate, because he got it.
OK back on topic. guess what else?
if they want to, a company can reissue shares under §251(g) as tokenized shares even if they weren’t tokenized before, as long as the tokenized shares are identical in all the important respects like rights, voting powers, etc. to the original shares. this is explained in §251(g)(2).
“Since §251(g) allows for a holding company reorganization where the new parent issues shares that mirror the originals, the holding company can adopt a blockchain-based stock ledger for its issuance process. This doesn’t violate the “identical” requirement because the form of record-keeping (traditional vs. blockchain) is administrative, not substantive—much like switching from certificated to uncertificated shares, which Delaware law expressly supports.”
hang on now.. do you remember the S-3 that was filed in May 2024, defining digital assets inside of the sale agreement contract between GME and Jefferies? for their share offering?
GameStop’s current corporate structure looks like this: GameStop Corp (parent) holding company → GameStop Inc (subsidiary) that manages retail operations. the shares are issued for ownership of the parent company. important to understand that the legacy business is managed by a subsidiary.
what if in the future GameStop wanted to maintain the brand identity for their retail business as the premier destination for how to spend your leisure time, but wanted to have a new name for their investment behemoth diversified holding company.. like Teddy?
they could:
• acquire a company that they find undervalued or owning an asset they would want;
• place it as a subsidiary of GameStop Corp;
• perform a Section 251(g) corporate reorganization;
• and name it whatever they want.
then it becomes Teddy (probably) → GameStop Corp → GameStop Inc.
you may be wondering why? ..well, tell me why shares of GME were labelled new class in 2024? kidding aside, this allows GameStop Corp to keep its current roles: strategic oversight, capital allocation, governance.. the investment policy.., and allows a new parent corporation to be formed to hold all of the acquisitions made by a dying, brick and mortar retailer-turned-investment fortress, managed by big dog and friends. and! it does not require a shareholder vote.
that could explain Section 4 of the warrant agreement, specifically why they chose to include legal definitions around a “Share Exchange Event” in the event of a reorganization:
it would explain the “new class” anomaly observed in September 2024 (or it was a private placement);
it would explain why the ATM agreement would require GME and Jefferies to have explained digital assets in a contract only to do with selling of their shares;
and lastly, it could explain why RC is so confident in his interviews with the news media.
talk about exciting times.
n.b.—this is just my personal opinion and fun speculation.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HAQNxohWoAAxOAO.jpg)
Geronimooooo 🔥 🔥
@IanMunsick
I don’t go to church and talk about being a Christian on here because I think I’m a perfect man or better than anyone.
I go to church, and talk about it on here, because I know I’m a broken who man, who makes mistakes daily, and consistently falls short of the glory of God.
I need a savior more than anyone.
Hope you have a blessed day, yes even those of you who disagree and hate me.
@sneedweb I like the way you think!
My tax return: -$362.78
Someone with 6 kids who hasn't worked all year: $11,385
“What’s your message to Lane Kiffin and maybe some of the people that doubted you and you guys keep proving them wrong?”
Pete Golding:
This might be the best Kewan Lacy film I’ve ever seen 🔥
🎥 @LandonTengwall 👌🏻
https://t.co/3GuK5dEe79
Second to last one of the season. Banger. 🤝
Tired of this #RESPECTOFF shit. We kicking their shit in and sending them packing. FUCK THE U #HottyToddy
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.8M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
111M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.8M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
70.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers