ali taylor

Fierce truth seeker. Dont trust authority or MSM. open minded and have a willingness to learn. Mum to 2 and always fighting for a brighter future for them.

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@justsay51706948 @JohnyBoat @robster12065612 Do you really not believe your own eyes? You must see it so why the questioning? Bbc ran an article saying millions were being pumped in to dimming the sun so hardly a massive leap to think it's actually being done? Surely?

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@ABridgen He's not wrong but there's so much more to report. These breadcrumbs of truth are there only to make you think you know the truth when it all a a smokescreen, trust no one

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@PixieTruth They let us have a summer last year, I'm hoping the same this, they have to make it appear that it getting hotter even if the temps they use are from Heathrow tarmac. Bonkers. But yes soul dimidnishing. Don't let them

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@WindsorDebs @GOVUK @POTUS Yup same down south. So sick of this. 3 months non stop raining now blanket of chemical smog. Met office, 1.5 degrees above average, yes because you've literally covered us in a blanket of shit for the last 6 months

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

Ian Huntley blatant distraction. Iran war for even more. Let's not stop talking and seeking justice for the victims of epstien. The very people maiming and murdering even more children in the name of freedom. I despair

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@NicholasLissack @Keir_Starmer @RachelReevesMP Austerity was a political choice all of it

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@brassic wtf was that about? Honestly heartbroken in the direction of the final series. Genuinely love it genius. I do hope you can sleep at night with the money that you have made making a total mockery out of the very people who have made you.

[Bob M 🇬🇧💫 @bobmca1]

🧵 1/3

Since assuming the role of Prime Minister following Labour’s victory in July 2024, Keir Starmer’s tenure has been marked by a troubling erosion of free speech in the United Kingdom, a nation once revered as a bastion of open discourse. Far from upholding the principles of liberty he once championed as a human rights lawyer, Starmer’s government has pursued policies and actions that reveal a chilling disregard for the fundamental right to free expression. His record is not merely disappointing; it is a betrayal of democratic values, cloaked in the guise of public safety and social cohesion.

As Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013, Starmer warned against overzealous prosecutions of social media posts, cautioning that such actions could have a “chilling effect” on free speech. He emphasised the need for balance, ensuring that only cases warranting court action proceeded, while trivial matters were resolved through apologies or content removal. This measured stance, rooted in respect for Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which guarantees freedom of expression, suggested a principled commitment to free speech. Yet, as Prime Minister, Starmer has abandoned this perspective, embracing instead a heavy-handed approach that prioritises control over liberty.

At the heart of Starmer’s assault on free speech lies the Online Safety Act 2023, a piece of legislation inherited from the Conservative government but wielded with alarming zeal under Labour. The Act grants Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, sweeping powers to oversee online content, ostensibly to combat terrorism and other serious crimes. However, its vague definitions and expansive scope have raised fears of censorship. Starmer’s government has done little to assuage these concerns, instead aligning with groups like the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), co-founded by Starmer’s Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney. The CCDH has advocated for Ofcom to gain “emergency response” powers to suppress “misinformation” deemed a threat to “national security” or “public safety”. Such terms are dangerously subjective, opening the door to abuse. The CCDH’s history of targeting content like “climate denial” as misinformation suggests a willingness to stretch definitions to silence dissenting views, a tactic Starmer’s administration appears to endorse.

Starmer’s defence of the Act - claiming it does not equate to censorship - rings hollow. In February 2025, during a meeting with US Vice President JD Vance, Starmer insisted that the UK “guards free speech preciously”. Yet, his government’s actions tell a different story. The Act’s implementation has coincided with a wave of arrests and prosecutions for online speech, particularly following the 2024 riots. Stephen Parkinson, Starmer’s successor as DPP, warned that sharing footage of the riots could lead to prosecution, a statement that sent a ripple of fear across the nation. Hundreds of thousands of Britons now hesitate to post online, wary of being branded criminals for expressing controversial opinions. This climate of intimidation is not the hallmark of a free society but of a state intent on controlling the narrative.

2/3👇

[Azat @AzatAlsalim]

Giorgia Meloni: "Islamic culture is not compatible with our European values.”

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

The White House admitted yesterday that the Covid Mask Policy was outright FRAUD.

WE NEED ARRESTS.

“Everyone must wear a mask…”
-Bill Gates (not a Doctor)

“I can’t breathe in this mask…”
-2 year old child

“I never said people had to mask”
-Bill Gates, Pathological Liar

[Chay Bowes @BowesChay]

When Peace was within reach in Ukraine, and prior to the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men, this person convinced Zelensky to scrap the peace plan and "fight on"

Neither he, nor the wealthy elite he comes from will die in the Trenches he turned to graves

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

The Shocking Mechanism Behind Vaccine-Induced Autism

Scientists have found aluminum in the brains of children with autism—at levels HIGHER than almost any human brain tissue ever recorded.

Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. It’s not supposed to be in the brain at all—especially not during early development, when the brain is most vulnerable.

We know aluminum is used in many vaccines to amplify immune response—but where does that aluminum actually end up?

@MidwesternDoc investigated. And what this medical researcher uncovered could change everything you thought you knew about vaccines.

🧵 THREAD

[Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP @CartlandDavid]

Dr Roger Hodkinson, [Apr 18, 2025 at 21:45]
For those who bought into the COVID narrative, it’s time to confront the truth—listen to this mainstream media report and face the betrayal.

They deceived you, and the cost is lives lost. Research now confirms—and Greg Hunt himself admitted this was the "largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever". A trial and you were the canaries in the coal mines.

A vaccine experiment where the spike protein lingers in the body for three years, fueling rampant inflammation. Is it any shock that young people are now battling turbo cancers, blood clots, and heart issues in unprecedented numbers? The devastation is undeniable.

This isn’t fading away; the voices who resisted in 2020 are still here, now joined by a growing army of the vaccine-injured, demanding accountability.

Join 👉 https://t.co/5tmKGXrgEb https://t.co/t2WdOLzvvS

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

This letter in The Times says it all

[Laura Trott MP @LauraTrottMP]

Labour spent years hounding women for speaking the truth and defending their own rights. Now Labour are attempting to rewrite history and pretend they supported women all along. The British people aren’t fools. The Education Secretary must stop the revisionism and implement the guidance that protects women & girls. https://t.co/66hrtLAO84

[Esther McVey @EstherMcVey1]

Surely no one was taken in by Keir Starmer’s theatrics at the weekend?

Recalling Parliament wasn’t about Scunthorpe but a cynical attempt at a distraction from the fury over the watering down of the rape gang inquiry & anti white police recruitment. 👇

https://t.co/3deW3xuH8k

[ali taylor @pixiepie88]

@MailOnline Haarp

[Bob M 🇬🇧💫 @bobmca1]

@Lewis_Brackpool This must be resisted at all costs.

[Bob M 🇬🇧💫 @bobmca1]

The push for a CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) in the UK, often framed as a modernising step for finance, threatens to undermine individual freedom, economic stability, and societal trust.

First, a digital pound controlled by the Bank of England would grant unprecedented oversight of personal transactions. Unlike cash, which offers anonymity, a CBDC could enable the state to monitor, and potentially restrict, every purchase or transfer. This isn’t hypothetical -countries like China, with their digital yuan, already tie transactions to social credit systems, penalising dissent or nonconformity. In the UK, a government facing fiscal pressures or political unrest might similarly weaponise a CBDC to freeze accounts of critics or enforce compliance, eroding the liberty Britons have long taken for granted.

Economically, CBDCs pose a systemic risk. The Bank of England claims it would enhance efficiency, but the transition could destabilise commercial banks. If citizens move savings from private institutions to a state-backed digital wallet, banks could face a liquidity crisis, reducing their ability to lend and stifling economic growth. The 2008 financial crisis showed how fragile the system can be - why gamble on an untested digital experiment? Moreover, a CBDC wouldn’t inherently solve issues like fraud or money laundering; criminals adapt to new systems, as seen with cryptocurrency exploits. The touted benefits - faster payments or financial inclusion - already exist through private innovations like fintech apps, without centralising power.

Privacy is another casualty. The government and central bank promise safeguards, but their track record inspires little confidence. From NHS data breaches to the Post Office Horizon scandal, institutional incompetence repeatedly exposes citizens to harm. A CBDC ledger, even if encrypted, would be a honeypot for hackers or insider abuse. Once cash is phased out - a stated long-term goal of many CBDC advocates - there’s no opting out. Every transaction, from a coffee to a political donation, becomes a data point for profiling or control.

Finally, the social fabric could fray. Cash lubricates informal economies - think tips, small traders, or charity collections - that a digital-only system might choke. Low-income or elderly individuals, less adept with tech, risk exclusion, further widening inequality. And in a crisis - power outages, cyber-attacks, or natural disasters - digital dependence could leave millions stranded, unable to buy essentials.

Proponents argue CBDCs prepare the UK for a digital future, but this assumes centralised control is the only path. Private digital currencies and decentralised finance offer competition and resilience without handing the reins to a state that’s often too clumsy or overreaching to wield them responsibly. A CBDC isn’t progress - it’s a step toward surveillance, fragility, and exclusion dressed up as innovation. The UK should reject it outright.

[Turning Point UK 🇬🇧 @TPointUK]

They're now trying to gaslight the British public into believing that the two-tier policing we all witnessed after the Southport terrorist attack never existed.

Muslim Defence League thugs were allowed to roam the streets with machetes and bats and were not arrested. In fact police officers told them to 'leave their weapons in the Mosque'. Meanwhile patriots were arrested and jailed for 'gesticulating at the police'.

Muslim Defence League thugs were allowed to violently assault and beat random people they accused of being 'far-right' - no arrests, and the police were nowhere to be seen.

Migrants in Harehills, Leeds were allowed to torch police cars and busses and the police ran away.

Police horses, riot shields, dogs and batons were deployed by police on patriot protests - we never see this sort of policing applied to any other political group.

They don't believe two-tier policing exists because they view the white working class as scum who deserve to be brutalised, whereas everyone else is a protected class.

Any police officer or politician who says two-tier policing doesn't exist is complicit.