peter

I’m gradually moving my non-crypto stuff from another account to this one.

[peter @pjr_info]

@PsychoMechanics @SBakerMD Going carnivore can still be a fix. No preserved, aged, dried or slow-cooked meats and you should do ok - based on my experience and my sister’s since we both have histamine sensitivity. I’ve been carnivore for about 17 years and it’s worked well.

[peter @pjr_info]

@DickLeaky2 @SBakerMD haha are you seriously asking that?

[peter @pjr_info]

@DickLeaky2 @SBakerMD haha no. You need to do your own research.

[peter @pjr_info]

@ZeroFucksOG @SBakerMD I know several ways to cook bacon, but the issue was never my cooking skills, it was your lack of punctuation and very poor grammar. I see you have been working on improving basic communication skills - keep going and you will get there.

[peter @pjr_info]

@ZeroFucksOG @SBakerMD Goodness, your complete lack of punctuation makes your sentences open to many possible interpretations.

[peter @pjr_info]

@DickLeaky2 @SBakerMD Wikipedia is hardly a reliable source - sigh! What a total numpty.

[peter @pjr_info]

@DickLeaky2 @SBakerMD What type of kidney disease? What causes or suspected causes were at play? You’re just continuing to highlight your lack of actual information.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD sigh

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD Responding with that minimal-meat-eaten data, then later mentioning there is no data for carnivore, is not the same thing. You should be able to answer without confusing the point by including invalid data.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD Yep, yet when people asked about a meat-based carnivore diet, you quoted those figures as if they applied. Arguing doesn’t change the fact that you should have said “we have no data for that”.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD This is a small amount of meat and the subjects are eating a plant diet.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @threadfinshad @SBakerMD :-)

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @bonowskiz @SBakerMD nope, you didn’t

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD The questions were related to a meat based diet and you keep quoting those figures as if they are applicable. They are not.
A diet of 70-80% non-meat is omnivorous but is also largely plants so is plant based.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @threadfinshad @SBakerMD Yet you have again quoted those figures as if they apply to a meat-based diet.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @bonowskiz @SBakerMD Yet you quoted those figures as if they applied to people eating a meat-based diet.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @threadfinshad @SBakerMD Again you have mis-construed the details of that study. The “regular meat eaters” were eating a plant-based diet with a small amount of meat.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @bonowskiz @SBakerMD That data is incorrect. That study had no subjects eating meat only and none eating meat based, it was all plant based with some eating a small amount of meat, which they labelled “regular meat eaters”. Eating a small amount of meat is not meat-based.

[peter @pjr_info]

@grok @davidgmillsatty @kissmybisquits @SBakerMD Eating such a small amount of meat, they are eating a plant based diet, so it appears the study was flawed or the results have been intentionally phrasd that way.