@USA_1ntegrity@a_clarke4@Trump_Fact_News That makes slight sense. But if we can see them from earths surface why can’t we see them when we are in the same orbit (I.e. the picture) when they would be a loooot closer to the camera
@rihyemars@Trump_Fact_News Are cars, houses, roads,and landmarks all in low space orbit? The same distance from the earth as this picture? That isn’t a valid argument. Plus if you can see a satellite from earths surface (which you can watch the starlings fly by if your in the right area) why not from space
@Shm0keyy@CNviolations They said before he bid it was at seventy then he bid 7500 so likely he was trying to type 75.00 but forgot the period…. Just use context clues
@a_clarke4@Trump_Fact_News THANK YOU SOOOO FUCKING MUCH IM NOT SAYIN G FROM THE GROUND…. This picture who’s taken in the same orbit as the satellites or at least a lot closer to them than we are from the ground.
@bwbanag@Trump_Fact_News Finally an education lesson and not some cuckwad calling me a retarded faggot… this makes sense as the camera would have to capture pictures at like one million fps to get the satellite visable. Thank you a lot lol
@Trump_Fact_News Okay everyone is saying “you can’t see the cars can you” that sounds so stupid as I didn’t know cars were in low earth orbit. The satellites are literally in the same varying distance from earth as this picture was. Also again literally didn’t say anything was fake wow cucktards.
@Trump_Fact_News I’m not trying to say it’s real or fake, I’m just asking a simple question for anyone that might be educated to know. Where are the over 7000 starlink satellites and over 5000 miscellaneous satellites…. Wouldn’t you be able to see atleast one with there being atleast 12000 there
@youmadlololol00@Trump_Fact_News Look at the sky and tell me how much of it you see other than look at that picture and tell me how much of the earth you see there’s a difference