Perry

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Yes, the EU does face a lot of crises she created herself mostly. Chinese modernization success was achieved by generations of good spirited people in the ruins of wars and struggle. I am sure Europeans are not all cry babies and with the help of AI, they can learn fast too.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

Ursula von der Leyen said she would explicitly raise the issue of “the massive influx of surplus Chinese products into Europe.”

Meanwhile, Chinese air conditioners are seeing a frenzy of demand in the European market, with demand far exceeding supply.

China’s response was simple:
trade is voluntary exchange,
and consumers are capable of making their own judgments.
Europe should abandon its zero-sum mentality.

At this point, Europe’s decline is not a mystery.

It cut off cheap Russian energy in the name of ideology.
It weakened its own energy autonomy.
It watched Biden’s subsidies pull industry toward America.
It got hit by Trump’s tariff war.
It lived off old industrial prestige for decades while refusing to update, compete, or scale.

And now it turns around and barks at China:
Why are you producing so many affordable, high-quality goods?
Why are Europeans buying them?
Why are Chinese companies making money?

Nobody forced European consumers to buy Chinese air conditioners, fans, EVs, solar panels, batteries, appliances, or electronics.
They bought them because the goods are useful, affordable, and competitive.

That is called a market.

If Europe wants to win, it can produce better products at better prices and sell them to China.

Europe tried before.

Did China scream about European car overcapacity?
Did China call Nokia’s dominance in China’s telecom market an existential threat?
Did China consider Siemens a market monopoly?
Did China accuse every successful Western brand of “flooding” the market?

No.

Because China competed.

Europe does not want competition anymore.
It wants moral protection for industrial failure.

China did not force Europe to become expensive, slow, dependent, and complacent.
Europe did that to itself.

Now Chinese factories are making what Europeans need, and Brussels calls that a crisis.

But China’s production capacity is not Europe’s problem.

Europe’s problem is that it can no longer build what its own people need at prices they can afford.

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

日本前首相提醒高市：当年中国免掉千亿赔款，是因为给日本立了个死规定。这笔钱按当时日本的国力算，差不多相当于他们全国一年收入的三分之一，可最后中国政府大手一挥，说不要了。这件事放到今天再看，容易被当成一笔旧账，其实它从来不只是钱的问题。

1972年中日邦交正常化时，中国正式宣布放弃对日本的战争赔偿要求。按照当时日本的经济体量粗略估算，如果中国真的像其他战胜国一样索要全额赔偿，这笔钱大约相当于日本年度国民收入的三分之一。

三分之一是什么概念？相当于���个家庭一年挣三十万，一下子要拿出十万块来还债，搁谁身上都得伤筋动骨。

更关键的是，1972年中国做出这个决定的时候，自己的日子也不宽裕。那会儿国内工业建设要钱，民生改善要钱，基础设施搞建设处处都是窟窿等着填。放弃这笔赔偿，绝不是因为"不差钱"，而是一个面向未来的政治决断。

那这笔账到底换来了什么？翻开1972年的《中日联合声明》，写得清清楚楚。日本承认中华人民共和国政府是中国唯一合法政府，理解并尊重台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，坚持遵循《波茨坦公告》第八条的立场。

注意一个细节：在联合声明的行文顺��里，一个中国原则相关条款排在赔偿条款前面。这个排列不是随意为之，而是清楚地表明，承认一个中国，是日本重返东亚正常外交秩序的前置条件。

换句话说，这是一笔对等的政治交易。中国拿出了实实在在的经济让步，日本拿出了白纸黑字的政治承诺。双方各取所需，各守本分，然后才有了此后几十年中日关系的基本稳定。

现在问题出在哪儿呢？高市早苗正在一步一步拆这个地基。

2025年11月，她在国会答辩里把台海局势跟日本的"存亡危机事态"绑在一起，这招的意思很明确——给日本行使集体自卫权、军事介入台海预留法律口子。紧接着她又搬出那份中国根本没有参与的《旧金山和约》，试图包装出一套"台湾地位未定"的说辞，把联合声明中的明确承诺轻飘飘地绕过去。到了2026年版《防卫白皮书》草案，"中国是最大战略挑战"的表述依然赫然在列，围绕台海的炒作持续升温。这已经不是什么口误或者个人失言了，而是一套有节奏、有层次的政策推进。

这里还有一个流传甚广的混淆需要戳破。有些人喜欢拿日本对华ODA（政府开发援助）来说事，觉得"日本给了中国那么多钱，算是变相赔偿了"。这种说法听着似乎有几分道理，但经不起推敲。

日本对华日元贷款累计约三万三千亿日元，听着不少，但主体是低息有偿贷款，要按期还的。而且ODA本质上是邦交正常化之后的双边经济合作，中国获得了建设资金和技术，日本企业获得了中国市场、订单和长期合作机会，双方互利互惠，各有所得。把经济合作跟历史责任搅在一起，用贸易往来去抵消一个中国原则的政治承诺，这在逻辑上根本不成立。就好比你欠了人家一个郑重的道歉，结果说"我后来跟你做了几笔生意，道歉就免了吧"，哪有这样的道理？

有意思的是，现在站出来提醒高市的，恰恰是日本国内的政治人物。

石破茂看得很清楚：1972年以来，历届日本政府在台湾问题上都保持着高度谨慎，这条线一旦打破，冲击的首先是中日关系的根基，而日本经济对中国市场和供应链的依赖程度，比很多人想象的要深得多。鸠山由纪夫等前政要说得更直白：炒作台海危机，本质上是给扩军找借口，最��会把日本战后几十年辛苦攒下的和平国家形象一把赔进去。

这些批评者并不是什么"亲华派"在替中国说话，他们算的是日本自己的利益账。

当年那笔政治契约，给日本省下了相当于三分之一国民收入的战争赔偿，换来了融入东亚经济圈的通行证，换来了几十年安稳发展的外部环境。现在如果有人非要把契约撕毁，代价谁来承担？远比当年那笔赔款沉重得多。

说到底，中国当年放弃战争赔偿，展现的是一个大国面向未来的胸襟和远见。但善意从来都有边界，克制也从来不是无底线的退让。

那份联合声明不是一张随便解读的废纸，而是两国关系的压舱石。台湾问题更不是什么可以拿来做政治投机的筹码，它是中国的核心利益，是半个世纪前就划定的底线。

中日关系的底层逻辑其实从来没变过：守契约，则两国互利，东亚共荣；破底线，则信用崩塌，地区共损。这个答案，1972年就写好了。

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

In the US，the dude touching a lady on her phone in a train like that is not only considered to be rude but also can be charged sexual harassment.

[杨凡❤ @yangfan39831908]

打电话的这位女性已经在尽量压低声音了，整个视频27秒，只能听到车厢里的环境噪音和日本人责怪的声音，完全听不到打电话的声音。既便这样，也会被日本人拍下来发到网上。这不是礼貌与素质，这是刻意制造矛盾。

[China Perspective @China_Fact]

China’s cutting-edge automotive technology has amazed overseas viewers.

[🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩 @Juliedonuts]

“NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS STOOD MORE FOR GOD.”

THIS is why we already defeated this evil enemy! HALLELUJAH! ✝️❤️🇺🇸🙏

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

@GrowSmarter_x @CadioArena The killer took her life first, then everything else was less important

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

我就知道有人会对中国狗为人服务这样的好事��虐待动物牵强附会。美国的狗的确也能当选市长，我们有时对宠物比对人还好，可这条视频与动物虐待没有半毛钱关系 。他就是个胆小鬼，不敢直说，只能用 we know how Chinese treat animals 这样模棱两可的语言抹黑中国人！

[Financial Times @FT]

The US and Iran have signed a peace deal. But what happens now?

The FT’s chief foreign affairs commentator Gideon Rachman breaks down the risks, opportunities and what to watch for next. https://t.co/Y8DGI6tajH

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Cloude Shannon

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out InsideEVs's video! #TikTok https://t.co/flvKZG0ZTE

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out josephstannard's video! #TikTok https://t.co/G3L5FoKsMB

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out BG2 Clips's video! #TikTok https://t.co/mwlVDAsGtE

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Source: Fortune
https://t.co/njfZL8eMi8

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out 黄士铨's video! #TikTok https://t.co/qSsWAw1l8q

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out 王者归来's video! #TikTok https://t.co/jl6WtPRzBm

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out 中国八一's video! #TikTok https://t.co/IFxxQ5Nwtz

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out Native American's video! #TikTok https://t.co/MTNeQXLgTK

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out Jaro Kvarin Hornacek's video! #TikTok https://t.co/wwCNp60xEk

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Welcome back to the bay area, Elon! #TikTok https://t.co/7ROb0xzKOC

[Perry @Pleasetwit]

Check out Truth Uncovered's video! #TikTok https://t.co/f2IPlCs5G5