The key difference between Eukaryotic and Procaryotic evolution and endosymbiosis :
Bacteria and archaea have adapted to virtually every ecological niche over billions of years. Through constant adaptation to environments, competitors, viruses, and resources, they have achieved remarkable diversity within their framework. Prokaryotes appear to have reached inherent complexity limits early in life's history. They have continued to diversify in form and metabolism but have not crossed certain thresholds into more elaborate cellular architectures.
For a loss of function to occur in evolution, a complete structure must already exist. While many small adaptations, such as antibiotic resistance, often involve the loss of certain functions, this is not the full picture. Energy supply matters greatly because evolving toward more complex structures requires substantial resources. This concept is one of the key reasons why gains of functions are rarer in nature.
Eukaryotes achieved a major leap through endosymbiosis: The fusion of an archaeon and a bacterium, two already existing structures. By integrating a bacterium that eventually became the today's mitochondrion, they gained a far more efficient energy source, (to give an idea glycolysis for prokaryotes only produce 2 ATP per glucose while Eukaryotes with respiration can produce up to 32 ATP per glucose).
This symbiosis was a breakthrough that unlocked new possibilities, leading to rapid diversification and the rise of complex multicellular organisms up to the forms we see today. While other paths to complexity might theoretically exist or even existed in the past, none appear to have persisted alongside eukaryotic lineages.
Endosymbiosis theory is supported by wide range of evidence. Mitochondria (and chloroplasts for plants and algae) are the only organelles that possess their own circular, prokaryotic DNA. This mitochondrial DNA is genetically closest to alphaproteobacteria which is a group that includes many intracellular parasites. The similarity in genome structure, sequence, and replication strongly indicates that mitochondria originated from an ancient alphaproteobacterium inside an archaeal host cell and evolved into a permanent symbiotic partner. Modern cellular parasites in the same bacterial group highlight this ancient shared ancestry is a result of divergent evolution.
In the modern age, Magicians were required to marry early. This was especially the case for female Magicians, so that they could marry quickly and bear children.
The reason behind this was that the sooner a Magician was born generation-wise, the greater the tendency for himor her to wield innately powerful magic. Scientists referred to this as “magic seeping into hereditary genes”.
The differences between the greatest Magicians of each generation weren’t obvious, but the average power level was on the rise.
(MKnR 1 Visitor Arc III)
L'Allemagne hitlérienne ne ressemblait pas à l'URSS et l'a encore moins prise comme modèle, l'un est élitiste, eugéniste, nationaliste alors que l'autre est prolétarien, lyssenkiste et internationaliste.
Les nationaux-socialistes allemands étaient et se décrivaient eux-mêmes comme un peuple libre qui travaillait pour lui alors que les soviétiques étaient à juste titre perçus comme des esclaves (On n'aurait jamais vu des condamnations arbitraires en Allemagne NS comme on l'a vu chez les soviétiques).
Il est quand même absurde de qualifier un parti anti-égalitariste comme étant de gauche. Alors oui un nationalisme racial implique une forme de collectivisme politique et une entraide entre les membres d'une communauté pour essayer de l'élever mais en quoi serait-ce particulièrement de gauche plutôt que de droite? C'est pas quelque chose que les partis typiquement de gauche font typiquement avec le clientélisme et le nivellement par le bas.
"dictature du parti unique" ; Les régimes démocratiques n'apportent pas la liberté, est-ce qu'avoir la liberté de faire le mal mais pas la liberté de faire le bien est vraiment quelque chose de libre?
Dans tous les cas l'État n'était pas une fin en soi pour les nationaux-socialistes.
I think probably a strong proxy for how Aryan someone is is the extent to which they sympathize with insects, spiders, etc.
I've always found it disturbing when people are callous towards their lives.
Universalist altruism is, in fact, a white trait.
@marek90011@TheAliceSmith Can you tell me what is bad in the "what actually happened" category? I thought I was clear enough when I wrote "for good people"
Republicans and other western cuckservative disgusting fags (with all due respect) tend to often lie about the Third Reich gun control policies.
They are incapable of conceptualizing a virtuous order where good people are armed and bad people are disarmed, only the in between "far west" next to leftist total anarcho-tyranny.
Black "people" shouldn't be legally allowed to own weapons for example, all data points to this being the most effective policy.
As the established format of how medicine is practiced decline with new technologies I think it would be better to use medical personnel to do check ups at the source in different districts on a planning like health frontier pioneers.
Not to promote Jewish pharmaceuticals overuse but to monitor if Aryan hygiene norms are respected, prevention checks (ex. observing children growth patterns) and also to gather data on individuals such as temperament and other phenotype features that could be put to use for long term policies.
« Si le développement actuel de la France devait se poursuivre pendant trois cents ans encore, la dernière goutte de sang franc serait anéantie dans l’État métis euro-africain en voie de formation. »
Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf 1925)
Quite a lot with modern DNA screenings and applied PGT for example.
That being said OP implied something illogical, you can in fact defend technological advances and modern medicine without accepting undesirables. Eugenics was precisely defended by doctors for this matter.
That the solution is more or less condemned remains a political issue, not an indefinite inevitability.
@TimVorgens Anonyme ≠ troll et tu oublis qu'en France le fichage est fortement pratiqué donc pour le travail c'est juste pas possible + les interdits bancaires.
L'anonymat est un garant sécuritaire pour pouvoir discuter de certains sujets.