Plenty.sol

Turn poetry into philosophy. NFA.

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@Backpack_CN 所以，这就是注册了一家证券公司。

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@luoyonghao 老罗，这次一定要把ming灯的电源线拔了

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@Miiiho420 @Backpack 好

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@0Xlynn03 那还行啊，先用着。主要vps你的邻居不搞事情就行，不然就会被牵连。

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@BagelJean7 新东家？

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@Madbenny 😂戏剧是本行，说起来无趣味。我来讲讲欧洲中世纪教父哲学与中国儒释道的理念与比较，以及backpack需要学习的东方精神。

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@DegenApeAcademy @fatlurkk 快乐！

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@Miiiho420 生日快乐。抽我100bp 我也去尝尝宝格丽酒店的方案

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@leoding0806x 佛金疯头像可以换一换了

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@wuhe_bp 破碎的lads群……

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@KgnCnKhrmn Free Mad Lads.
Maybe run a 1:1 airdrop into a new collection.

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@leoding0806x @armaniferrante We were the face of solana, before exchange. Hope you can set us free .

[RGY.NFT🎒🐧🦣 @renguangyao]

Have been quiet for a while. Frankly, am struggling with the mixed feeling about @Backpack .

On one hand, I admire the exchange and still hold my conviction it is so far the best one I have used. The cross-collateralization convenience is a killer. Not to mention compliance and brick-by-brick improvement.

However, as a @MadLads , I am deeply disappointed at how we are treated recently. The community has been supporting this project for years. In return, we are discarded like a piece of paper, or even worse. Before TGE, I had thought the team doesn't want speculators to cause volatility, thus @armaniferrante downplayed the importance of the community. Until today, I realized that they want to build a $BP token community badly, so Madlads community is a debt that has to be get rid of as soon as possbile.

I am a community person. I still believe @MadLads is the best community on Solana. It will be criminal if the community is abandoned and dying out just because the team that founded us doesn't want us anymore. Even as a refugee or orphaned community, we still need to survive and prosper.

In addition, backpack team will also face a reality-check of what matters, product or community/reputation! Until yesterday, I have been advertising the exchange to my VC and Family Office friends. Yesterday, they all sent me the news about the team betraying our community with no more words. I feel like being heavily slapped on the face.

Anyways, I will still hold my NFTs, still tell people that I am in a good community, still use the exchange lightly when necessary. But I WON'T recommend anyone to trust and invest in the exchange or buy $BP token. After all, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me!

[Kigalu @ulagik]

致 @Backpack 团队及 @armaniferrante：关于 TGE 现状，一些来自社区老兵的真实心声：

作为一名高位持有 Mad Lads、全程参与积分活动并质押了大部分 $BP 的普通用户，在 TGE 后的波动期，我想分享一些关于市场信心变化的客观观察：

1. 机制不透明诱发的舆论反噬
TGE 规则的滞后与不透明，导致严重的信息不对称。这不仅让部分真实用户被误伤，更给了收割负面流量的 KOL 甚至竞争对手攻击的口实，将技术性的去女巫风波恶意上升至地域偏见。这种公关危机本可以靠更早、更清晰的规则公示来规避。

2. 低 FDV 开盘与早期参与者的真实亏损
二级市场开盘后的估值表现，导致投入大量真实手续费参与积分活动的早期支持者面临巨额亏损。当“真实贡献”与“预期回报”出现严重倒挂，参与者的信心便会转化为对项目长期价值的剧烈动摇。

3. 核心社区的疏离感
Mad Lads 曾是 Backpack 最坚固的忠诚基石。但在 TGE 后，老兵们收到的回馈与 VIP 权益的调整，让不少人产生了被“边缘化”的失落感。目前社区内的一些负面声音，其实是源于极度热爱后的心理落差。大家很担心：Mad Lads 支持者的今天会不会是 $BP 质押者的明天？

4. 规则变动对契约感的考验
质押一年的股权转换比例从最初预期的 20% 调整至 12.5%，配合文档中“随时变动”的免责条款，在一定程度上削弱了投资者的安全感。共识的稳固往往源于规则的确定性，而非灵活的动态调整。

对项目方的务实建议：

实质性赋能，对齐预期
请提供对散户具有真实吸引力的 $BP 赋能方案。二级市场的买盘不靠口号支撑，而是靠清晰、可持续的利益回馈机制驱动。

明确 Mad Lads 定位
若不再将其视作生态核心，请给社区一个信号，“不爱请放手”，还社区以自治；若依然珍视这块招牌，请让我们看到明确的强绑定规划。

Armani，社区的共识是 Backpack 最大的护城河，而这份共识源于双向的真诚。我们依然在坚守，因为明白伟大的项目必经磨难。请让我们看到那个有格局、重承诺的 Backpack 重新归来，给所有愿意托付未来的支持者一个确定的答案。

#Backpack #MadLads #Solana

[Plenty.sol @plenty_dd]

@leoding0806x @Backpack 222111？

[Smol @SmolMobster]

The problem isn't the low Backpack allocation itself, it's everything around it:

>no clear big-picture plan for MadLads
>holders made to jump through hoops just to be included (loyalty, medals, staking, wallets, etc)
>1% allocation for your most loyal community signals they're no longer part of the plan
>everyone who held a MadLad looks bad now, damaging the pfp's public perception
>many people bought MadLads specifically to position for the Backpack airdrop and got punished for believing
>farming holders for metrics creates expectations that a $200 allocation clearly doesn't meet
>regardless of who is right, the holderbase is upset and the floor is collapsing. The absence of a clear response from Armani and the team is making it worse >"MadLads got airdrops before, stop complaining" is conceding defeat. Should we just watch the floor and perceived value die because NFTs as a sector are struggling?

Everyone knows MadLads were a great mint and hold.

But it's also a fact that the Backpack drop didn't treat them as the core community.

It treated them as a debt to be ticked off before moving on.

And now Mad Lads looks like a project that served it's purpose and is left to die.

As a long-term holder and believer, I hope the team recognizes this and acts on it.

MadLads should be the Solana blue chip and the face of Backpack.

Loyalty cuts both ways.

[Solar (Solana中文社群) @Solana_zh]

面向企业打造的 Solana Developer Platform (SDP) 正式推出

你可以在数周内，而非数月，在 @Solana 上发布金融产品。

通过整合 20+ 基础设施服务商的 AI-ready API，你可以创建稳定币、RWA，或编排支付流程。

@Mastercard @WesternUnion 和 @Worldpay 已经在 SDP 上构建。

通过企业级 API 构建与扩展金融产品，全部通过一个统一接口完成：

- 选择托管服务商
- 发行并管理稳定币
- 对 RWA 进行代币化
- 执行合规检查