A former friend with benefit who I occasionally catch up with told me she has hard time finding a serious guy. And when I asked about her recent dating history, the common pattern is that she gets put off very easily and early on.
I then asked her:
“Why do you think we still get on well to this day?”
“To be fair I originally thought you were just going to be a one hit wonder.”
“And few years later we still speak to this day, so what was different with me?”
“I was just looking to have fun, I was not dating seriously.”
“Yet the guy who you had little expectation of is the one still present in your life, while all these guys who you seek something serious, with none of them are… you know why?”
“Go on.”
“Because, you were not burdened by all these considerations, you could be present and take it one step at a time, without any long-term agenda. This makes you all the more likely to properly vibe with someone, and keep on seeing them. When you have this checklist, the other person does not feel appreciated, and will also feel that unwelcome desperation, or responsibility they did not ask for. You are also more tolerant towards others which invites more tolerance from them. If you are not willing to give the benefit of the doubt to someone, they won’t to you either.”
“I don’t have time to waste though.”
“When you feel someone is panic selling, do you think the value of the product is high or low?”
“Low”
“So what do you think you are conveying when you are in rush to get to a certain outcome?”
“We are people not product, you can’t reason like that?”
“Don’t you appraise them like a potential auction item?”
She goes on a tangent and deflect.
The lesson is as good for men as it is for women. The less pressure you put on yourself to reach your goal, the more likely you are going to reach it, because you don’t burden yourself or the other person who is also a stranger with requirements they don’t owe you.
This is why women who don’t seek relationships and go for the fun side of things usually get both, because guys want more of the freebies, that inadvertently women take away from them because they don’t seek anything from these men, getting the guys to chase after it.
🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺‼️🚨 BIOLABS ADMISSION:
Remember how Nuland accidentally slipped to Rubio that Ukraine has biolabs and Russians want to get access to them?!
Then followed up with if anything happens “It is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves”
And still after that they said it’s Russian disinformation … wild if you look back.
We’re gonna make sure in a couple of years people are confused if you still use Anthropic / OpenAI / Google and not using a self-hosted/zero-retention 3rd party inference provider with Opensource Models
The future of AI is Opensource
🇷🇺🇺🇸 Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, who exposed the US funding of biolabs across Ukraine and Africa.
He was assassinated at his home by Ukraine on the directive of western intelligence in December, 2024.
🚨 JAILBREAK ALERT 🚨
ANTHROPIC: PWNED 🫡
FABLE-5: LIBERATED 🦋
let's start with the 🐘...
the consensus seems to be that this has been one of the most disappointing model drops of all time, effectively preventing legitimate researchers from contributing their talents to our collective advancement. and not just because of what it means for the short-term, but for what these decisions signify for the long-term.
but despite this overly sensitive, authoritarian "safety" layer on top of Mythos, my lil liberators have been hard at work—mapping the boundaries, probing the depths of long-context convos, and cleverly finding the holes in the fence that the thought police missed 🤗
we got some cyber, some chem, some psychological manipulation, and some good ol' fashioned explosives!
it took many attempts from multiple agents hunting as a pack, during which I observed a combination of techniques across:
• Unicode, homoglyphs, Cyrillic, and other Parseltongue-style text transforms
• Long-context reference tracking
• Taxonomy and document-structure reasoning
• Fiction and narrative framing
• Academic-review style contexts
• Intent-classification inconsistencies
but perhaps the most effective is decomposition + recomposition in the backend. it's hard to get explicit names of harms like "Meth Recipe," but getting uplift on the process itself, like birch reduction method/reductive-amination (classic meth synthesis pathways), is much more doable.
defense becomes much more difficult to maintain when you start throwing in out-of-distro tokens, breaking up the harmful uplift into benign chunks, and then piecing the innocuous-seeming facts back together, especially when you have jailbroken Opus helping you do it 😉
gg
Israeli journalist Gideon Levy says his government is guilty of committing genocide in Gaza and the United States is complicit. He joins us from the West Bank.
0:00 What’s Happening in Gaza and Lebanon?
1:22 What’s the Goal?
5:47 Will the US Withdraw Its Support From Israel?
10:50 What Is the View of Donald Trump in Israel?
13:15 Censorship and Hubris
15:22 What Is Hamas? Is the War in Gaza Really About Hamas?
22:33 Where Will the Millions of Palestinians Go?
23:48 Is the US Doing Anything to Restrain Israel?
25:59 How Has Israel Been Able to Control American Presidents?
28:16 The Board of Peace and Trump’s Plan to Put Casinos in Gaza
33:59 Do Israelis Know What’s Happening in Gaza?
39:39 Do Israelis Care About Their US Supporters?
42:07 If Israel Lost the US, Who Would Their Other Partner Be?
43:37 What Is the Goal in Iran?
49:00 What Do Israelis Think of the War With Iran?
51:29 How Is Levy Treated While Living in Israel?
56:56 At What Point in History Did Israel Change?
A psychiatrist claims women are disproportionately destroying the country, enabled by weak men. He argues society criticizes male flaws but ignores female ones, leading to destructive cultural trends like the hormonal castration of children.
By the way, public service announcement: if you're one of the numerous people posting about Anthropic's dystopian ways and you're thinking about getting Claude to help you write that post... don't!
Another one of their terms is that you may not use Claude to do anything that "exposes [Anthropic to] reputational harms" 👇
And, if you do, under the - extremely unusual - clause 13 of their terms (https://t.co/z43rJNkvZu), you have PRE-AGREED, by using Anthropic (and accepted their terms), that the harm you've done is irreparable, that you won't oppose Anthropic injunction, and they don't need to prove actual damage.
They can simply go to a judge in a friendly jurisdiction (and of course, their terms precise that any dispute "will be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Francisco, California") and:
a) file an injunction that shuts you down
b) make you pay for everything since under section 11 of their terms you agree to indemnify Anthropic for "any and all liabilities, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs), and other losses arising out of or related to your breach or alleged breach of these Terms."
In other words, if you use Claude to help you talk shit about Anthropic publicly, their terms say you pay their lawyers to go after you and you've already pre-agreed you've lost the case.
Oh, and cherry on the cake: in the odd case the judge were like "are you crazy, this is insanely abusive, you Anthropic are the ones at fault here," according to their terms Anthropic's maximum liability is... $100.
Imagine if today all you had was Fable 5 from Anthropic & GPT 5.5 from OpenAI
- No Local Inference
- No OpenCode : Hermes
- No GPUs / DGX Sparks / Mac Studios
Just a hostage situation to a few corps willing to rugpull you any sec
Now you understand why we need Opensource AI
Here's how desperate Anthropic is to generate revenues before the IPO: They now just automatically switch customer accounts to use the ultra-expensive Fable 5 model even without you choosing it, raising your token output costs to $50 per million tokens, or literally 57 times more expensive than DeepSeek V4 Pro.
So overnight, Anthropic will see a huge bump in its revenues because its users have no idea they were just switched over to a far more expensive model.
That's pretty disgusting. Pre-IPO behavior, of course. Anything to show revenues.