Logic Q
Who benefits from willfully not doing “what works”?
Who benefits from claiming “X works” and is selling “X”?
Extrapolate from answers to SOR/SOL …
I kind of feel like all of "why won't these idiots accept this one clever trick to fix education" folks should get one season and then have to fuck off forever instead of resurfacing with new terrible ideas every couple years.
@plthomasEdD The connection between advocacy and publishing sales should give everyone pause. I’d love to assume best intentions from all, but historical evidence doesn’t support that. Long time teachers are “sold a story”, every few years.
Lots of research shows isolated grammar lessons/exercises (worksheets, textbooks) do NOT transfer to original student writing
Direct grammar lessons in the context of student writing, however, does transfer to later writing
NO ONE is against teaching grammar ...
No one is "against memorization"
Some against ISOLATED memorization for memorization's sake
Memorization best (long-term, applicable) when in the context of authentic behaviors, often comes AFTER not before that engagement
I had lots memorized AFTER writing dissertation
As a life-long SC voter and skeptic about "good" politicians ...
I typically vote against ...
But @AnnieAndrewsMD will receive my vote as a vote FOR, not just against the awful R candidate
An off-the-radar issue with SOR advocacy:
University of FL
U of F Literacy Institute
UFLI Foundations
For Sale at Ventris Learning
So U of F/ LI profs publishing pro-SOR "scholarship" is supposed to be accepted as unbiased?
https://t.co/8raJYf0WUY