Paul Harper

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@TRHLofficial Guess they have to spend it somewhere

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@afneil Are you suggesting that the front benchers are somehow better?

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@TRHLofficial you have to love it here

[bayes @bayeslord]

this account is legendary

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@InsideLucysHead If girls were sold with lessons? That’s an interesting idea

[Murray Rothbard @MurraySuggests]

Do it.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@SirSimonClarke @K_Niemietz We need to abolish the planning laws.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@JulianGoldieSEO Yes

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@LeeHurstComic Have they got any assets to go after?

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@LeeHurstComic To stop his allies, in that task, having their oil exports being taxed and enriching the Iranian regime. The main task, however, is done. Not to hard to work out.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@AJA_Cortes As much as they want to create. Usually by screwing the investors from the earlier rounds.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@GarethDavies007 @zarahsultana Abolish all MPs

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@LeftNatLeft We could abolish Parliament and get rid of the biggest wankers of all

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@afneil @rorysutherland He may well do that. It is likely his best chance of ever winning an election.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@afneil The biggest factor in the interest rate differentials between the UK and other similar economies is the planning laws/the tendancy of UK property prices to be inflationary dues to lack of supply. It isn't new.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@TheBTCTherapist His job was to keep prices stable……

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@JulianGoldieSEO YES

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@morellifit BIBLE

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@itsolelehmann @aisolopreneur Coworker

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

@nayibbukele No. Increases in productivity and any excess supply of labor are countered by falls in the price of money and costs of employment , stimulating both more demand and investment. The free market works if you let it.

[Paul Harper @pmharps]

That is not totally accurate either. He defended monarchy in the context Austria, saying that it was more libertarian than the democracy that superseded it. For him this was the result of the democratic authorities being seen as more legitimate in there decision making and therefore they make more laws than a monarch that thinks his laws are more likely to be disobeyed.
The US has been extremely lucky to have a written constitution, idealogically commited to key aspects of libertarianism.