You’re missing the point. In your previous post you asked how they could be charged with robbery if the money was acquired by a less than lawful means. And I answered you that it does not matter how the money was acquired, it’s still robbery. That’s why I gave the example I did. If the money was from harvesting human organs and selling them on the black market, the theft is still robbery.
Personally I think it would be shitty to charge the kids for selling lemonade, there are probably lots of places where it’s in no way illegal. Even where it technically is illegal, it’s probably never enforced.
@imkiddingrelax1@libsoftiktok I think you’re just a non humorous troll, but I’ll try to answer. If those kids had been selling pot at their stand, and had been robbed of $50, it wouldn’t matter where the money came from, it’s still a robbery. It’s a separate matter than where the money came from.
This is a sexual assault—unknowingly captured by a mom filming her daughter’s wrestling match.
Kallie didn’t know her opponent was male. But she knew something was very wrong.
Today @ADFLegal helped Kallie sue the WA officials who placed gender ideology above her safety. 🧵⬇️
As a Japanese watching the UK right now, I have one simple question.
A Sudanese asylum seeker just tried to behead a local man in Belfast. The victim lost an eye.
This comes after years of grooming gangs raping thousands of British girls — gangs that police and councils deliberately ignored because they were afraid of being called racist.
In Japan, even one case like this would have triggered national outrage and immediate policy reversal.
But in Britain, the conversation is still about “not being far-right.”
British people, at what point does protecting your own children become more important than protecting your reputation?
We genuinely do not understand this.
@kirbyhocutt Lol, this is like bringing on board a teacher convicted of molesting children and saying "Well, he went to a therapist and told us he was cured" so you put him in a kindergarten class.