بلو محمد عبدل

Life humbled me early that’s why i don’t act like yall

[بلو محمد عبدل @Point_Dexterr]

@eurofootcom Mans was already thinking about signing haaland and starting bernado silva as LB 😂🫤

[TonySnip3r @tonysnip3r]

Making money, managing money, and growing money are 3 completely different skills, brother.

You won't ever touch true wealth until you master all three.

Stop hustling blindly & learn the leverage..

[Adroit Cadet @Adroit_Cadet]

Thissss, is a passer.

THIS

This is what Man United have lacked in 15 years …

Don’t care if he’s 19, 29 or 53 years old

This profile is soooo needed vs lower/low-to-mid blocks

Debate it with your dad

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

@arojinle1, I do not know what religion you practice, but your mention of ‘the coming of the Arabs’ reads as a jab at Islam, even though I don’t want to conclude it is.

If there is any religion/belief that should be praised on this topic, it is Islam. This is because it was Islam that came to dismantle these devilish folklores.

First of all, your claim that traditional belief didn't associate owl with evil or witchcraft is more of a decolonial talking point than a historical fact. There are documented evidence that showed that owl do appear negatively in some pre colonial African folklore (Yoruba inclusive) independent of Abrahamic influence.

There is a book titled "Owls Used as Food and Medicine and for Witchcraft in Africa". In short, this book found that owls have been used across ancient cultures as food or medicine as well as heralds of events.

It was used in magic or witchcraft activities, based on interview studies conducted in 20 African countries between 1996 and 2002, and it documented 333 owl killings, with 17% of cases involving owls killed because they represent an omen of death or disaster.

Therefore, the findings from this book negates what you have insinuated.

Interestingly, it was Islam that came to dismantle these beliefs. In the Pre-Islamic Arab, the pagan Arabs themselves used to fear the owl and considered it an evil omen. They called it Hama, which was their ignorant superstition that the bird brings death or bad luck.

It was the prophet who destroyed such belief. He said in Sahih al Bukhari:

لا عدوي ولا طيرة ولا هامة ولا ��فر
"There is no infection conveyed without Allah's permission, no bad omen, no Hama (evil omen of the owl), and no bad omen in the month of Safar."

Let me say clearly that the pre Islamic Arabs who held this superstition never set foot in Yorubaland. If anything came to Yoruba land it is the direct opposite of what you have accused them of.

You need to verify your historical facts before sneaking our religion into your takes.

Thank you for your attention.

Allah knows best.

[David Ornstein @David_Ornstein]

🚨 Youri Tielemans move from Aston Villa to Manchester United through £35m release clause in midfielder’s contract. #AVFC had no wish to sell + offered new deal but left with little choice due to mechanism & #MUFC set to proceed on transfer @TheAthleticFC https://t.co/KbWwD1jxov

[Ōu🔻 @ashita_valdez]

The concept of a push gift though, is it for the entire pregnancy period, or is it specifically for the act of pushing the child out, meaning during the actual delivery stage?

Personally, I also think it is something of a materialistic agenda in reality, though one I have zero issues engaging with. It is not a bad idea after all. Interestingly though, I could have sworn I came across something about gift-giving and nafaqah on an Islamic level with regards to delivery, but my knowledge on this particular affair is too limited to say anything with confidence, which is why I am genuinely interested in knowing whether there is an Islamic position on this and what exactly the religion's take on it is.

On another note, if the push gift is understood to cover the entire pregnancy period and not just the delivery itself, then I actually see nothing wrong with the husband being recognised as well. Calling it a "push-up gift" for the husband is ridiculous since he is not pushing anything😂😂, but in an ideal and genuinely involved husband sense, he has had to manage his wife's needs, navigate the emotional and physical demands she places on him during that period, and take up a significant share of responsibilities throughout the pregnancy. Given all of that, what exactly is wrong with him being appreciated for his efforts, especially when the wife is the type who is actively expecting a push gift herself?

I also believe dismissing this with "the baby is gift enough for him" is actually a dangerous slippery slope, particularly given all the preceding arguments that have been had on Twitter about house chores.

[Fabrizio Romano @FabrizioRomano]

🚨💣 BREAKING: Youri Tielemans to Manchester United, HERE WE GO! 🔴🇧🇪

United activate €41m release clause into Tielemans’ contract at Aston Villa, verbal agreement also with Belgian midfielder.

Andrey Santos done + Tielemans next after Éderson deal called off on Friday. 📈

[Arojinle @arojinle1]

How else do I break this down for you and your thick people? I gave you the football analogy and it still flew right over your head. If football, a sport with no real stakes beyond bragging rights, is fierce enough that no club will help solve a rival club's crisis, what makes you think a political candidate will lift a finger for a rival party's?

Men once competed with honour, valour and spine. Today we have weaklings like your principal, crawling to the very opposition he claims to want to defeat, begging him to come and sweep his own house. How shameless can you be?

Go to the UK and ask Labour to bail out the Conservatives. Go to the US and ask the Democrats to prop up the Republicans. You won't find it, because rivals don't nurse rivals back to health.

At least, you studied Law. What you're asking is for the defense counsel to be gentle with the prosecution witness. If your principal's house is burning, that is the whole point of the contest. Nobody hands the arsonist a fire extinguisher and calls it fair play.

A ruling party that fixes its opposition is not being noble, it is being reckless, and it is insulting the very voters who worked to put it in power. You do not ask the man who won the fight to also stitch up the man he defeated. If your principal cannot organise his own party, he has no business asking anyone to vote him in order to organise a country.

[Abdulqader Ghazi @mk_ghazii]

Lindsay Graham once told an ICC prosecutor that the ICC is "for Africa and thugs like Putin".
It was never intended to apply to the US and Israel.

[Ola Daniel @CableAnalyst]

Don’t celebrate in sin what you achieved through prayer.

[Dr Raj @DrRajChohan]

A key thing I’ve learnt: there comes a point where you need to have strong conviction from previous pattern recognition and it outweighs sample size. And this conviction is why successful people are often early.

[OJ Smoke @OJ_Smoke_]

Allahu Akbar. One of the most evil men in history is dead

Lindsey Graham called for a “holy war” against the Muslim world, and he was the biggest war hawk in the entire US Government

He was healthy just 4 days ago while having a meeting with Syria’s President. Now he’s in Hell.

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

You are mixing two different things up here. Nobody said morally upright or religious Muslims should step back from politics. We desperately need good, God fearing people to rescue the country from the rogues you mentioned.

The argument is specifically about Scholars. There is a big difference between a devout Muslim running for office and a Sheikh whose primary job is to teach the Deen and guide the Ummah.

When a regular good Muslim enters politics, he represents his own track record. When a high ranking scholar jumps into partisan politics, he carries the entire religion on his head.

Scholars are supposed to be the moral compass of the society. They are the referees who should hold the thieves and thugs accountable. But when the referee drops his whistle to put on a jersey and start playing in the mud, who is left to check the players?

A scholar loses his independent voice the moment he starts making political compromises to beg for votes.

We need good Muslims in power, no doubt. But we need our scholars to remain scholars so they can guide those politicians without bias.

I hope you don’t mix them up again.

[Dr. Priyam Bordoloi @DocPriyamMD]

We were taught this organ was completely useless, just a ticking time bomb waiting to get infected and surgically removed.

But science now shows it actually acts as a secret "safe house" for your body.
Which organ is it?

A) Gallbladder
B) Tonsils
C) Appendix
D) Spleen

[John Iadarola @johniadarola]

I intend to treat Lindsay Graham with exactly as much compassion, empathy, and understanding as he treated the children of Gaza.

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

These are one of the evils when a scholar is insistent on dabbling into high stakes politics.

Normally, for a regular Muslim politician, going to a church to seek votes is a matter with different angles in Islamic jurisprudence.

Ibn Taymiyyah in Al-Fatawa al-Kubrah held the view that it is disliked and he stated clearly that this is the position of the companions particularly if the church has images.

While other scholars including Ibn Qudamah in Al-Mughni opined that it is permitted, provided the Muslim does not participate in any of their religious rites.

By this, if a regular political candidate goes to the church to present his manifesto and canvas for support, we see him as a politician who is just looking for numbers. The strict boundary remains that he does not join their prayers or compromise his belief.

However, for a scholar like Prof Pantami, the bar is even higher. A scholar is a walking Fatwa.

Whatever a Sheikh does, the everyday Muslim takes it as a direct religious endorsement. A regular candidate can make a questionable move and his political party takes the blame. But when a respected scholar compromises his boundaries to lobby for votes in spaces he usually would avoid, the religion takes the fall.

There is no way Prof Pantami can mix the weight of Islamic scholarship with the desperation of partisan politics without something breaking. Politics will stain his white.

I thought he was joking before. Now my eyes are cleared. I hope he will still be able to speak the truth now that he is begging the same people for platform.

Allah knows best.

[Dr. Omar Suleiman @omarsuleiman]

In other news, Lindsey Graham is dead.

“I am with Israel. Do whatever the hell you have to do…”

“Level the place.”

“Do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin”

Bye Lindsey. May you live an eternity in ruins for the ruins you helped create in Gaza. Ameen

[Ōu🔻 @ashita_valdez]

Depending on the father's financial capacity, his age, and the sacrifices the children believe their mother has made, I don't think their concerns are irrational. I'd say the father's financial situation and age are the biggest determining factors. For what it's worth, the children, and even the second wife herself, can quickly become their responsibility if things go awry. In certain cases where the father is irresponsible, it may even be the first wife's family that has to bear many of the inconveniences.

In fact, that's only one possible scenario. Overall, it is definitely their business because, one way or another, it will affect their lives.

Just as it can be beneficial for them in some cases, it can also be a net negative. Verily, I've heard Shaykh Abu Naasir mention that his neighbour's second wife is the one taking care of the children from the first wife after both their father and mother passed away. She alone will benefit from the goodwill that follows, financially, emotionally, and, I daresay, even through the du'as, as those children will most likely pray for her more than they'll pray for their own parents.

I also have a friend who loves his stepmother far more than he loves his biological mother.

All in all, their lives are deeply interconnected. Just as a second marriage can have negative consequences for the children, it can also become a tremendous source of benefit and positive influence. Although, I have said before, far too many men are deficient in marriage, so to see the upset situation more often than not, is in line with the reality.

[Sadiq G sadiq @sadiqGsadiq]

Learn sexual discipline, you are not a wild animal

[FZNATION @Fznation01]

Unfulfilled goals keeps a man of greatness awake than caffeine ever did