He is right, Ustadh Ijaz @IjazTheTrini.
The Quran is a human invention with no divinity. Look at the two pictures below.
This is the Ṣanʿā’ Manuscript, one of the oldest Quranic manuscripts.
It was discovered during restoration of the Great Mosque of Sanaa and identified as a palimpsest (a manuscript where the original text was erased for new writing) in 1981.
Two Layers of Text: Both layers are in early Hijazi script.
Upper Text: Matches almost entirely the standard Uthmanic (canonical) Qur’an used by Muslims today.
Lower Text: Revealed with ultraviolet light and computer analysis, it shows significant variations in wording, spelling, and even the order of surahs.
This means the Quran, believed to be perfectly preserved and without error, is not.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
I can show evidence of corrections, erasures, tapings, and joinings in the earliest mushrafs, proving beyond doubt that humans heavily edited the text.
Here are some examples of verses showing differences between the two layers:
1. Surah At‑Tawbah (9:85)
Standard Qur’an:
"And let neither their wealth nor their children impress you. Allah only intends to torment them through these things in this world, and then their souls will depart while they are disbelievers."
Lower Text (Ṣanʿā’):
Entire verse is missing.
Do you see how grave this is? An entire verse was part of the original composition and erased in the Quran.
2. Surah Al‑Baqarah (2:87)
Standard Qur’an:
"And We gave Moses the Scripture and followed AFTER HIM with messengers…"
Lower Text (Ṣanʿā’ / Pre‑Uthmanic Layer):
Instead of "after him," it reads: "upon his footsteps/traces."
Literal Translation:
"And We gave Moses the Scripture and FOLLOWD IN HIS footsteps with the messengers…"
This completely changes the meaning.
This is the Quran, a human invention, rewritten and altered repeatedly over centuries.
The Quran is a forgery. Islam is a fabrication.
Let’s compare poor Christian nations with poor Islamic ones.
The Philippines: I was there last year. Majority Christian, about 91%, financially poor. But walk the streets and it's joy and music and hospitality. Cities filled with dancing and laughter. You might get offered a meal and a karaoke mic in the same hour.
Now compare that with poor Islamic countries like Somalia, Yemen, or Afghanistan.
What is the fruit? Fear. Depression. Violence. Kids holding AKs. Women hidden. Joy that feels restricted and illegal. Questioning faith is dangerous. Conversion can be deadly. Apostasy penalties exist.
And our Bible says the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. (Galatians 5:22-23)
Show me that fruit of Islam. Show me gentleness in Sharia law. Show me peace in jihad.
You can’t—because the root determines the fruit. So don’t judge by claims. Don’t judge by numbers. Judge by the fruit you actually see. And if you're honest, you can see which one leads to freedom.
After I converted to Christianity, my Muslim family asked me, “What would it take for you to come back to Islam?”
The truth is, it’s not about debating Jesus or the Trinity. This isn’t about Christianity at all, it’s about the foundation of the Islamic house and the foundation of the faith.
So here are 5 things I would need to see if I were to ever go back to Islam:
https://t.co/PXJFP1IhYx me the Kaaba was actually
built by Abraham and Ishmael, using pre-Quran sources, archaeology, Jewish texts. Right now, you have to rewrite the Torah to make it fit.
https://t.co/4adGa8nhOe me Muhammad was an Ishmaelite. You can’t inherit a covenant if you’re not in the bloodline.
https://t.co/iZII1LIxuH me the Quran wasn’t altered under Uthman. If it’s perfectly preserved, why the burning of variants and standardization?
https://t.co/eqUIwlsYOf me clear prophetic continuity from the Old Testament to Muhammad. Not vague parallels, direct prophecy. If he’s the final messenger, the Bible should point straight to him.
https://t.co/kd5tJwDPKE me eyewitness accounts of Muhammad’s first revelation. Right now, it’s his wife convincing him after a traumatic cave experience, unlike other prophets who knew they were called.
None of this is about Jesus actually. This is about Islam’s own claims. Because if the foundation is cracked, arguing about the furniture doesn’t matter.
No Kaaba link.
No Ishmaelite link.
No preserved text.
No prophetic line.
No verified calling.
I can’t go back with those questions unanswered.
Because we get asked a lot.
The Technological Republic, in brief.
1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation.
2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible.
3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public.
4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.
5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.
6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost.
7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way.
8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive.
9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret.
10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed.
11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice.
12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin.
13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet.
14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war.
15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia.
16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn.
17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives.
18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.
19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all.
20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim.
21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.
22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?
Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska
https://t.co/8igjazz1On
The lunatic left that took over Twitter was Wormtongue to the World.
Firing @Jack was the final straw. He was the last bulwark.
Now Bret Taylor is chair of @OpenAI …
Muslim preacher in Britain explains why muslims hate the rest of humanity for Allah’s sake. Praying 5 times a day isn’t enough. According to him, the divine secret of Islam is hatred toward the rest of humanity.
Muslim country first cousin marriage rates and average IQ (An IQ of 100 is considered average)
- Pakistan at 65% first cousin marriage rate, average IQ 81
- Saudi Arabia 58% first cousin marriage rate, average IQ 76
- UAE 54% (82 IQ)
- Iran 40% (80 IQ)
- Yemen 45% (62.9 IQ)
- Qatar 30% (80.8 IQ)
- Oman 36% (78.7 IQ)
- Syria 39% (74.4 IQ)
- Turkey 25% (86.8 IQ)
- Jordan 32% (80.7 IQ)
- Egypt 32% (76.3 IQ)
- Morocco 26% (67 IQ)
- Mauritania 43% [99 percent Muslim] (59.8 IQ)
- Sudan 30% [97 percent muslim] (78.9 IQ)
- Afghanistan 46% (82.1 IQ)
- Algeria 39% (76 IQ)
Again, an IQ below 70 is considered mental retardation. An IQ of 100 is considered average
Muslim country first cousin marriage rates and average IQ (An IQ of 100 is considered average)
• Pakistan at 65% first cousin marriage rate, average IQ 81
• Saudi Arabia 58% first cousin marriage rate, average IQ 76
• UAE 54% (82 IQ)
• Iran 40% (80 IQ)
• Yemen 45% (62.9 IQ)
• Qatar 30% (80.8 IQ)
• Oman 36% (78.7 IQ)
• Syria 39% (74.4 IQ)
• Turkey 25% (86.8 IQ)
• Jordan 32% (80.7 IQ)
• Egypt 32% (76.3 IQ)
• Morocco 26% (67 IQ)
• Mauritania 43% [99 percent Muslim] (59.8 IQ)
• Sudan 30% [97 percent muslim] (78.9 IQ)
• Afghanistan 46% (82.1 IQ)
• Algeria 39% (76 IQ)
Again, an IQ below 70 is considered mental retardation. An IQ of 100 is considered average.
- @WallStreetApes
Christianity is the only religion that handed its critics the exact tool needed to destroy it.
Every religion faces the same structural problem: how do you ground an invisible truth claim in something verifiable? The bridge you build between the transcendent and the tangible determines everything about how stable the whole system is.
Most traditions solve it one of three ways. Islam grounds its claim in a sacred text, but the Quran’s divine origin is confirmed by the Quran. Buddhism grounds itself in inner experience; essentially, enlightenment is real cos you feel it. Most prophetic traditions ask you to trust the messenger. In every case, the chain between the claim and the evidence is thin. One step removed from “just trust me bro.”
Then you arrive at 1 Peter 1:3.
Peter doesn’t ground Christian hope in a text, a private experience, or prophetic authority. He grounds it in this: “A living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.”
A dateable, locatable, publicly witnessed historical event, one that is, in principle, falsifiable. Not a feeling or a tradition. Paul said it plainly: “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile.” No other religious movement plants its flag that way. He put everything on the table.
And the framing goes deeper. Jesus isn’t simply someone who rose. He is the firstfruits; in Jewish agricultural theology, not the whole harvest but the pledge and guarantee of it. His aliveness is the down payment on yours.
The historical architecture around this claim is interesting.
Paul names the witnesses in a letter people could fact-check. Five hundred people at once, most still alive when he writes. Proclaimed in Jerusalem, the same city where it happened, within weeks. The Roman empire was motivated to shut it down. Jewish institutions were motivated to shut it down. Neither produced a body.
Now think carefully about what would have weakened the credibility. À sole witness would have been dismissed as grief. A remote location would have been unverifiable. No post-resurrection appearances would have left a gap b/w the death and the hope. And an immediate ascension would have severed the transmission entirely.
Instead you get 40 days. Named witnesses. Multiple independent appearances. Public proclamation in enemy territory.
If you wanted to engineer a resurrection story for maximum credibility in 1st century Jerusalem what would you change? The architecture isn’t just sufficient. It is over-engineered. Which raises the question nobody who dismisses this casually wants to sit with, who fabricates a story this carefully and then dies for it?
Peter wrote this to exiles, people stripped of belonging and security, people who would see through bullshit. He doesn’t comfort them with vague theology. He tethers their hope to a man who walked out of a tomb, ate fish on a beach, and told their spiritual father where to cast his net.
Every other tradition asks you to trust something unverifiable. Christianity asks you to evaluate an event.
The witnesses were named. The city was real. The tomb was empty. Two thousand years of motivated opposition followed.
Nobody used the knife.
To any future historians reading this, this era will make a lot more sense if you remember that every name is the opposite of what it really is. The antifascists are fascists, the antiracists are racists, the fact-checkers are propagandists, etc. Hopefully this has been fixed by your time.
🚨 To EVERYONE arguing 'The New Testament doesn't support Christians standing with Israel'—read this and think again! 🔥
The NT is CRYSTAL CLEAR: God has NOT rejected His people Israel!
- 'Has God rejected his people? By no means!' (Romans 11:1) — Paul shuts it down immediately.
- 'All Israel will be saved' (Romans 11:26) — Future massive turning to Messiah!
- 'God's gifts and calling are IRREVOCABLE' (Romans 11:29) — No take-backs on His promises to the Jewish people.
- Jesus Himself: 'Salvation is from the Jews' (John 4:22) — Our Savior came THROUGH Israel.
- They remain 'beloved for the sake of the forefathers' (Romans 11:28).
Replacement theology? Replacement argument? BUSTED. God's covenants stand. The Jewish people are still elect, still loved, still central to His plan.
Christians: Stand with Israel—it's straight Bible, not politics. God's not done with them... and neither should we be! 🇮🇱✝️
Who still wants to debate? Drop your verse below 👇 #Romans11 #StandWithIsrael #BibleTruth #NewTestament #GodsPromises"
Around the world, manuscripts are found to record history, in this photograph it shows four men holding signs of how many documents have been found and recorded for each.
Laying some light on these documents authenticity, and who has the most and greatest amount of documents, you can tell who they are by the photograph, and what history has said about them!
A lineup of some heavy hitters from history, each holding up a number. Let's break it down:
From left to right, the figures are:
• Genghis Khan (holding 10): The fearsome founder of the Mongol Empire.
• Alexander the Great (holding 50): The legendary Macedonian king and conqueror.
• Julius Caesar (holding 250): The powerful Roman general and statesman.
• Jesus (holding 25,000): The central figure of Christianity.
Now, about those "documents" and their authenticity: The numbers they're holding represent the approximate number of ancient manuscripts or copies of texts that exist about each historical figure or from their time.
This is a common way to illustrate the disparity in textual evidence available for different historical figures.
• Authenticity: The concept of "authenticity" for ancient documents is complex. Historians and textual critics evaluate manuscripts based on factors like the age of the copy, the number of copies, consistency across different copies, and corroborating archaeological evidence.
• Who has the most "documents": Jesus has the most documents (25,000) by a significant margin.
This number typically refers to the vast number of early New Testament manuscripts and fragments that have been discovered, making it one of the most well-attested ancient texts.
The numbers for the other figures are generally representative of the number of existing ancient sources and copies available for studying them.
__________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes on him shall not perish, but have everlasting life." - John 3:16
"By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he rose on the third day according to the Scriptures," - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." - Romans 6:23
"If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." - 1 John 1:8
"And the jailer brought them out, and said, 'Sirs, what must I do to be saved?' And they said, 'Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved,'" - Acts 16:30-31
"For by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father (The Father God) except through me." - John 14:6
"Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though they die, yet shall they live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?” - John 11:25–26
A Muslim asks a Christian man about the Crusades in the Middle Ages.
“Before the Crusades, Islam had invaded the Christian lands of Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Spain, Portugal, Turkey. And was trying to conquer Europe.”
Another Muslim asks about the European slave trade.
“The Islamic slave trade had existed for centuries before the European slave trade, from both Africa and Europe. And it never really ended.
Your prophet Mohamad was a slave trader.”
Preacher and Islamic scholar Suad Salih on the rape of Yazidi women by ISIS:
“Allah allows Muslims to rape and humiliate non-Muslim women.
If we fight Israel, we will take Jewish women as sex slaves and rape them.
This is permitted in the Quran and hadith.”
These are not fringe voices on the street — this is a figure presented as a religious authority.
How long will the West keep pretending this has no real, world consequences?
Islamist Mohammed Hijab explains his Jihad. "The reason why you have to fight them, is because they are Jews & Christians. You should fight them until they give you the Jizya (extra taxes). There is no conceivability of peace between Muslims & non-Muslims.
"Islam is a warrior religion, it's about expansion & conquest."
It was edited & abrogated for 23 years by Muhammad.
And then it was revised for a decade after his death until the THIRD caliph burnt all the 115 (Ubayy), 116 (Abu Musa) and 111 (Ibn Masud) sura qurans and only kept the 114 (Zayd) sura quran we have in multiple variants today.
The West is Greek Wisdom.
The West is Roman Order.
The West is Germanic Fervour.
The West is Iberian Devotion.
The West is Celtic Imagination.
The West is Slavic Perseverance.
The West is Christian Faith.
Islam supports:
Pedophilia
Sex slavery
Slavery
Wife beating
Stoning of adulterers
Amputations of dissidents
Polygamy
Taking captives
Raping captives
No female consent in marriage