@Villgecrazylady It's very simple. "Acquitting the guilty and condemning the just — both are detestable to the Lord." - Proverbs 17:15
If God hates it, so should you.
I think you misread me. I actually have genuine concern for you. I don't know you, or anything about your relationship with Christ, but for whatever reason your video popped up in my feed and struck a chord with me. I will be praying that you find the peace that passes understanding by the renewal of your mind through Christ Jesus, the Way, the Truth and the Life. God wills that none should perish but that all should come to repentance (which is the key to deliverance from demonic oppression)
I didn’t want to watch the debate. I’m exhausted by the subject. But our culture has turned it into the most urgent conversation of the moment, so I forced myself to sit through it. Here’s what I took away: There is an enormous amount of conjecture on both sides. We will almost certainly never get a real trial or a definitive accounting of what happened. No one has produced anything close to “overwhelming evidence.” Anyone claiming certainty at this stage is either foolish or acting in bad faith. I see far more of that posture on one side than the other. Questions are not the problem. Premature certainty is. It feels a lot like Covid.
I didn’t want to watch the @RealCandaceO@paleochristcon debate. I’m exhausted by the subject. But our culture has turned it into the most urgent conversation of the moment, so I forced myself to sit through it.
Here’s what I took away:
There is an enormous amount of conjecture on both sides. We will almost certainly never get a real trial or a definitive accounting of what happened. No one has produced anything close to “overwhelming evidence.”
Anyone claiming certainty at this stage is either foolish or acting in bad faith. I see far more of that posture on one side than the other.
Questions are not the problem. Premature certainty is.
It feels a lot like Covid.
I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense.
In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here.
When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated.
When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation.
I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated.
As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed.
I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account.
I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant.
I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime?
Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost?
Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture.
Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril.
If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving.
In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.
The part that concerns me most is the amount of people that have already come to a “final conclusion”. A lot of people seem perfectly comfortable assigning guilt before a trial even happens (@farmingandJesus included). That should alarm anyone who still believes process matters. Since you brought up Covid: the people most locked into the official narrative back then were the same ones masking alone in their cars, treating the shots as unquestionable, and trying to silence those who were asking questions. Questioning isn't the problem, drawing final conclusions without due process is. I see one side doing that more than the other. What specific final conclusions has Candace actually locked herself into here? I don’t follow her closely, so I’m genuinely asking.
@DocDutcher@sniffingbooks5@WesleyLHuff@elonmusk Jesus confronted this same instinct in his disciples. No amount of money solves this problem. He said it plainly: “You will always have the poor among you.” You cannot buy new minds, no matter how much you spend trying. Regeneration only comes through a relationship with him.
I love how a bunch of people who believe men can get pregnant are the same people that claim to stand on "the science."
Vaccines, abortion, transgenderism. Every thing they believe in is completely wrong.
And I truly believe this is the reprobate mind. This is God handing people over to themselves.
It's judgment.
@JoelWBerry Your demand for total ideological compliance belongs with the liberals. Congratulations Joel, you’ve become just like the NPC’s we laughed about during Covid.
@farmingandJesus@ClazyauntEaton@RealCandaceO It happens. We judge fruits and doctrine, but only God knows the heart. Better to test everything by Scripture and leave final judgment to Him. Which fruit has you questioning her salvation?