Reason Relation

grad student interested in analytic philosophy, german idealism, and post-structuralism (annoying)

[Jules @analytichegel]

Read Carnap. Read Reichenbach. Read Neurath. Read Thomasson. Read Tarski. Read Leitgeb. Read Peirce. Read James. Read Wittgenstein. Read Ramsey. Read Quine. Read Sellars. Read Hilbert. Read Waissman. Read Awodey. Read Frank. Read Hahn. Read Gödel. Read Schlick. Read Menger.

[Jules @analytichegel]

Cuba if it adopted logical positivism

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@itsjolyne someone called her out for wearing a burzum shirt and all she replied was “seethe” 😭 sorry but the girl never left the chud phase behind entirely

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@bengrossbg There are parts of Tales of the Mighty Dead that explain Inferentialism’s differences between other kinds of isms that is really nice to help understand what Inferentialism is doing and say what classical rationalism or empiricism does differently

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@bengrossbg As the book develops across the first two parts, the parts on Pragmatics and Semantics, it basically is more or less a rehash of the very minimal system Brandom established in Making It Explicit but read out of Hegel

[Yegor Letovian Accelerationist 🇩🇴 @LetovCCRU]

hell yeah

[florence 🦐🏳️‍🌈 @morallawwithin]

Hi @ChristopherNolan I’m a big fan. Please adapt the Timaeus next

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@tonyhawktruther @yacan1 life in the greatest city on earth is exactly like your dream

[❥ 𝑪𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒆 𝑳𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑭𝒂𝒏𝒔 ❥ @tonyhawktruther]

I had a dream last night I moved to Pittsburgh and I was walking around talking to strangers looking at old buildings and thinking “Wow this is all so wonderful… I was born for this”

[matty matt @noetic_emetic]

the resolute reading extends to logic gooning

[nom @14JUN1995]

When I was a graduate student, I mentioned something about Marxism to another student. He replied, “Oh, I don’t know anything about Marxism. I study logic.” I think about that a lot.

[Jules @analytichegel]

Quine: “content is exhausted by publicly available dispositions to assent under shared stimulus”
Analytic philosophers: “aww, how sweet”
Carnap: “content is exhausted by publicly available dispositions to assent under shared stimulus”
Analytic philosophers: “uhm, HR?!?!”

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@ProgPro is this a bad time to say that I really liked this and this was one of my favorites from the soundtrack

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@khalilacp @TuttReal I am not doing that and I would not commit to the idea that a social-historical-material critique in general is dogmatic. I’m saying that Glouscard reasserting the very thing D&G argue against, without arguing against the content of their argument is dogmatic

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@khalilacp @TuttReal Oh i think specifically Glouscard’s point is dogmatic critic, a reassertion of what Deleuze is critiquing without engaging with the substance of his argument is dogmatic, because it does not actually contradict it in content, but only in form

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@TuttReal @khalilacp It’s not that I don’t think those kinds of conditions don’t have any bearing, but always framing them from a strictly external dialectical point of view often fails to meet the immanent criteria of derivation and criticism demanded by immanent critique

[Reason Relation @poststructures]

@TuttReal @khalilacp But a dogmatic reassertion of historical and material conditions is something I find a lot of Marx sympathetic critics do to sidestep the metaphysical, explanatory, and methodological differences without engaging in the substance of argument