Powell

[缘起性空❤️100% @hygge1986]

美图分享

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

一个中国原则是中日建交的前提。不知日本怎么想的。
不过有一点是肯定的:琉球群岛不叫冲绳，也不是日本的。

[油爆琵琶拌着面🇨🇳 @zmx8067]

6月26日，🇨🇳中國外交部長王毅與🇰🇭柬埔寨外交部長兼副首相在釣魚台國賓館的萬柳堂用工作晚宴後道別。

王國委最近實在是太辛苦了，這個工作強度直接拉滿了。👍

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

乌军无人机飞手被俘交代出来的东西，让不少人心里一沉，原来仗打到今天，样子已经彻底变了。
事情出在俄乌前线，一片被炮火炸平的高层废墟里，俄军费了九牛二虎之力拿下一块阵地，抓了个乌军的无人机飞手一审问，交代出来的实情，让大伙心里直冒凉气。
这片阵地满打满算就趴着十六个乌军，对面压过来的，可是一整个俄军合成营三四百号人，坦克、装甲车和重火力全配齐了。
按常理，扛住这种规模的冲锋，怎么也得挖深战壕，架起重机枪死磕。
结果这十六个人手里连把像样的步枪都没摸，阵地上全是堆成山的f p v自杀式无人机和几台终端设备。
他们往深里挖着十几个人，根本不去碰遥控器，他们的活极其简单，充其量就是个前线打杂的。把无人机一架架摆放整齐，通上电调试好，直接连接一个叫黄蜂世界的远程空政治网里划定好大致的房区，剩下的事全交给系统去自动派单。
这套网络搭在星链上，只要网线不断，全世界随便哪条街上的网民都能登录进去，这就真成打游戏了。按下攻击键的人一大半，根本没踏进过乌克兰半步。
他们可能正坐在波兰街头的咖啡馆里，喝着拿铁，或者躺在北美的卧室大床上。这些人里头混着退伍老兵搞i t的码农，数量最多的其实是平时痴迷飞行模拟，爱玩穿越机的年轻电竞玩家戴上威尔眼镜，手里攥着手柄，盯着第一视角的屏幕，跟平常在家里打排位赛没有任何区别。连签证都不用办，连炮弹的响声都听不见，只要家里路由器够稳，隔着半个地球就能直接拔刀相响。
更有意思的是，里头的赏金机制，这就跟咱们平时跑外卖接单一样，明码标价，多劳多得。画面传回系统，一核实干掉一辆坦克给多少钱？炸掉一辆装甲车爆多少金币？端掉一个人员掩体，都有对应的价码，钱直接打进账户。纯纯的计件工资，重赏之下，必有勇夫。
全球各地不同时区的人轮流上线，白班、夜班，严丝合缝的衔接前线那片天上的无人机，二十四小时跟绿头营一样嗡嗡转，底下的俄军连喘口大气的功夫都没有。早几年咱们聊无人机打仗，飞手还得缩在前线几公里的掩体里，死死盯着屏幕，稍微一露头就被对面的反制炮火连锅端了。人员损耗一直是个大麻烦。现在玩法变了，前线就留几个换电池的修理工，真正的杀手躲在几千公里外吹空调。
俄军这次拼了老命冲上阵地，抓到的不过是几个前台服��员。真正下死手的人，早退出了系统，下楼买夜宵去了。
以前老一辈总数落年轻人打游戏是不务正业，谁能想到这本事，直接搬到了绞肉机一样的战场上。那些常年玩穿越机的老手飞起f p v来，比正规军的新兵担子溜多了，手感和准星极其可怕。战争的门槛就这么被一根根网线生生拉到了地下室里，打仗，再也不用穿军装。受军训，只要懂点技术，愿意掺和进去两千公里的距离，在卫星网络面前跟一层窗户纸一样薄。
乌军算盘打得极精，俄军一个营的装备，几百万上千万美金，一架小飞机的成本满打满算几百块，十六个人，配上一堆便宜塑料件，硬生生顶住了一支重装部队。
这买卖简直划算到了家，麻烦事儿也就跟着来了。当一个平民坐在沙发上动动手指头，就这能随便决定千里之外一条鲜活人命的去留。
这笔账该算在谁头上？这些隔空打牛的玩家，算不算正规战斗员，真要是犯了事，拿哪条国际法去抓人，条文里全是大窟窿。美国那边的智库早就就盯上了，这是白纸黑字地写着，只要网速够快，会用手柄，任何人都能无缝切换成数字。战场上的冷血狙击手，这套模式要是落到极端组织手里，地球怕是真要进入一个毫无底线低门槛的杀戮时代，俄军现在也是焦头烂额，前线被这帮机械蜂群搞得神经衰弱，后方还得提防无人机偷偷溜进来炸炼油厂、干扰机、激光炮全搬上来了。
星链的抗干扰底子太厚，根本清不干净。往后想要是再把a i自动识别，量子加密这些狠活加上去，战争彻底变成一堆算法，在云端互相撕���。
当杀戮变成一种可以在手机上订阅能打卡领工资的兼职任务人，对生命最起码的那点敬畏心早就烟消云散了。打仗不用死，自己人，扣扳机的顾虑就会少的可怜，摩擦起火的概率绝对直线飙升。
黄蜂世界听着是个挺时髦的软件名，背地里却是把潘多拉魔盒先开了一道大缝，科技跑得越快，咱们越得拽紧手里的缰绳。
技术进步的初衷是为了造福全人类，改善咱们的生活，绝不是用来批量制造生灵涂炭的机器。咱们生在和平年代，更得看清这些冰冷武器背后的残酷真相。无论战争形态怎么变异，尊重生命，维护世界和平，守住人类。的道德底线，才是全人类必须共同坚守的正道。

[Girl AI @langtu15021984]

🧡🧡🧡 Tối diện đồ đi dự tiệc, không biết bộ đồ này mọi người đánh giá ra sao đây nữa ❤️❤️

[Spycraft101 @spycraft101]

Isabelle Cheng is a former Taiwanese intelligence officer who successfully co-opted a senior U.S. State Department official named Donald Keyser in 2002.

Keyser joined the State Department in 1972 and spent many years in various locations throughout Asia including Beijing, Tokyo, and Taipei. He was fluent in Chinese and conversational in Russian, Japanese, and French, and made valuable contributions wherever he went. But Keyser also had a string of romances with various women over the course of his career and was well-known among his peers for his wandering eye

In the fall of 2002, while serving as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific affairs, Keyser was introduced to Cheng, who was ostensibly an employee of the quasi-diplomatic Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, but in reality, an intelligence officer for the Taiwanese National Security Bureau.

The two quickly became close, and what to Keyser’s mind was a romantic affair began. The romance soon came to the attention of State Department counterintelligence and the FBI, who began surveilling the pair. Keyser emailed Cheng hundreds of times and failed to report foreign travel related to the affair, or to report the relationship at all, as required by regulation. He even went so far as to describe a coworker as someone who was “ripe for recruitment” by a foreign intelligence service.

In September 2004, Keyser was observed bringing classified documents to a lunch meeting with Cheng and her boss, General Michael Huang, the senior NSB officer in the US. A search of his home also turned up thousands of neatly filed classified documents.

After a protracted legal battle, Keyser was sentenced to 366 days in prison. Cheng escaped serious consequences and now teaches at the University of Portsmouth in the United Kingdom.

For episode 120 of the Spycraft 101 podcast, I spoke with Robert David Booth, a retired State Department counterintelligence agent. We discussed several of the biggest cases of his career, from foreign intelligence agents to officials leaking sensitive documents to the press. The episode is available now.

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

台积电：防了大陆几十年，结果副总是美国间谍，核心机密全被卷走

一道防线，修了几十年，砖一块块加厚，眼睛全盯着海峡那头。可真正把保险柜搬空的人，竟然是自己人手里捧了二十一年的老臣——二十箱手抄的纸面资料，跟着这位资深副总裁的退休行李箱，一路飘洋过海，落进了大洋彼岸英特尔的办公桌。
主角叫罗唯仁，今年即2025年75岁，2004年进的台积电，从营运副总一路爬到资深副总经理。在公司里他不是普通老人，10纳米卡壳那阵，就是他拍板搞出＂夜鹰计划＂，让研发人员两班倒、24小时连轴干，硬把工艺拽过了��槛。
他领导团队拿下超过1500项专利，2011年张忠谋亲手把＂台积电荣誉奖牌＂挂到他胸前，这是公司内部的天花板荣誉。
可问题就出在这位＂老法师＂身上。
按台积电的规矩，但凡碰过核心研发的高管，岗位一调动就得彻底＂洗手＂。
2024年3月，他从研发管理岗被调去企业策略发展部，按理说该远离前线。这种安排，业内人一看就懂——给个体面位置，把人挪开机密圈。
偏偏他没＂安分＂。
台积电后来自己捅出来的细节挺扎心：那个企业策略部门，本职是给董事长、总裁当幕僚，根本不该再碰具体技术。
可罗唯仁转岗之后，照样把级别比他低、跟他没有汇报关系的研发同仁喊去开会，拿正在做的先进制程和未来路线图的资料。这种动作，持续了一年多，居然没人按停止键。
真正让人后背发凉的，是他临走那场告别。
退休面谈里，公司法务长当面递上提醒函，把竞业条款翻给他看，还专门问了一句去哪。他回答得很自然，说要去学术机构搞研究，对英特尔的事，一个字没提。
结果手续办完没几天，人就坐上了飞往美国的航班，转身出现在英特尔的高管名单里。
更狠的还在后面。
他被指利用高阶主管身份，让团队反复给他做技术简报，离职前带走了涉及2纳米和1.4纳米先进制程的20箱复印资料和手写笔记。
注意——是纸的，不是电子的。
台积电的电子门禁、追踪系统全球数一数二，电脑里一个文件挪个位置都有记录；可纸质文件夹在公文包里走出大门，安检往往睁一只眼闭一只眼。这些资料涉及2纳米GAA晶体管结构、A16超级电轨设计参数、EUV光刻工艺窗口、良率提升的专有诀窍，全是台积电压箱底没对外公开的看家本事。
二十箱，纸面，手抄。这三个词凑一起，整个保密体系等于被人钻了空子。
CEO陈立武直接发内部信，表示全力支持罗唯仁加入，称针对他的指控＂毫无根据＂，还特地强调老人家此前在英特尔干过18年。
一句＂老员工回家＂，把＂挖墙脚＂包装成＂回流＂，话术滴水不漏。
台积电这边憋不住了，去年11月底正式把人告上台湾智慧财产及商业法院，这是公司创办以来头一回告自己的资深副总。可懂行的人都知道，这场官司从开打就尴尬。
为什么？跨境追责的硬伤摆在那里。
罗唯仁是美国公民，台湾地区和美国之间没有正式的引渡安排，人不回来，法庭基本拿他没办法。
连外媒都直白点破：外���最关心的问题，是台湾地区的法院究竟有没有权力要求英特尔解雇一位美籍执行副总裁，或者至少让他暂时停职。答案不言自明。
岛内媒体看得也透。
《经济日报》注意到一个细节：台积电这次告的罪名是＂妨害秘密＂，而不是更重的窃取先进制程机密，这暗示在举证环节，台积电手里的牌并没有外界想象得那么硬。
还有传闻说，英特尔开出年薪数亿美元的条件请罗唯仁过去，事先就已经把官司怎么打、怎么挡，全套预案谈妥了。
这就不是单纯的＂高管跳槽＂，更像一场精心设计的产业搬运。
媒体人李艳秋在社交平台上一句话戳到痛点：这位老人身家几十亿，刚拿了＂工研院院士＂，张忠谋又亲授最高勋章，他带着机密投奔对手图什么？背景却是特朗普指责台湾＂偷走＂美国芯片、台美关税谈不拢、马斯克筹划和英特尔合建芯片厂——巧合得令人背脊发凉。
英特尔在2025年8月跟美国政府签了协议，将近90亿美元的联邦补贴直接换成了将近10%的股权。说白话，美国财政部成了英特尔的大股东。
有了这层关系，英特尔接订单的速度直接起飞。
最响的一炮，是苹果。
2026年5月初，《华尔街日报》率先爆出英特尔和苹果敲定了初步代工协议，消息一出，英特尔股价单日一度飙超19%，收盘涨近14%，市值冲破6200亿美元，创下历史新高。
苹果可是台积电几十年来攥得最紧的金主，从A系列到M系列，全部独家代工。
这堵墙，被苹果亲手凿开了第一道缝。
特朗普曾在白宫的一次会议上当着库克的面力推英特尔，还在今年初公开说美国政府从入股英特尔上＂赚了几百亿＂。
商务部牵线，总统站台，这种打法已经不是商业逻辑，是国家战略。
订单清单还在拉长。英伟达拿出50亿美元入股英特尔，并将在它的产线上生产定制数据中心CPU；马斯克旗下的Terafab项目（服务特斯拉、xAI和SpaceX）也选了英特尔代工；微软和亚马逊AWS更早就签了。短短一年，那个被唱衰的＂病人＂，转眼成了各家巨头排队送钱的＂香饽饽＂。
再回头看罗唯仁那二十箱资料的分量，就完全不是一回事了。
台积电的麻烦还不止这一桩。
今年早些时候，公司就发现2纳米技术被工程师外泄过一次——通道是跳槽到日本东京威力科创的前员工，回头拜托原同事偷关键技术。
一边是日本拉人，一边是美国挖人，前后夹击，硅盾被磨得越来越薄。
罗唯仁这次告状还��出另一层——据说他早年战功显赫被延后退休8年，今年却没再获董事会批准延任，因此心生不满。
董事长魏哲家头疼的不只是一位老将出走，而是中生代接班梯队的暗潮已经全面浮上水面。
这家公司花了几十年的力气，把围墙修向同文同种的对岸，反间谍演习一年比一年严，却没想到真正把家底掏空的，是头顶＂盟友＂光环的人，是公司里资历最老、勋章最重的副总，是一次走完所有合规流程、看起来体体面面的退休。
＂防贼＂的方向错了，再厚的墙也没用。
罗唯仁的官司怎么判，其实已经不太重要。重要的是这件事撕开了一个真相——当一家企业被卷进大国博弈的牌桌，所谓的技术独立、所谓的护城河，能不能守住，常常不取决于自己有多努力，而取决于别人愿不愿意让你守。
这道题，留给台积电，也留给所有处在产业链顶端的玩家。

[Jeffrey J. Hall 🇯🇵🇺🇸 @mrjeffu]

In recent days many political opponents of Prime Minister Takaichi have been arguing that she committed fraud by referring to herself as a congressional researcher.
Their misinterpretation of English language documents and articles is quite surprising. They point to sources that refer to her as an "intern" - which doesn't carry the same meaning in DC as it does in Japan. It would be quite common for congressional staffers to refer to any kind of temporary worker, including fellows, as "interns."
Most of the sources they cite contain information about Takaichi engaging in serious research as part of her job. Before seeing some of these sources, I had some doubts about whether she actually did very much research, but witnesses describe her as conducting research and writing reports.
The fact that she wasn't directly paid by the US Congress is also in line with ethical standards. The Matsushita Institute funded her, which is appropriate for congressional fellowships.
As an American, I don't really see a major ethical problem with Takaichi telling people in Japan that she was a "legislative researcher for the U.S. Congress." I doubt many Japanese people in the 1990s would have understood the job duties of a congressional fellow, so she created a Japanese language job title that explained the content of the work. It wasn't an era when you could just use Google and read an article about the meaning of "Congressional Fellow."
Her lack of English fluency today is also no evidence that she didn't have better English ability back in the late 1980s. It's been nearly 40 years since her fellowship and she hasn't been using English on a daily basis.
My followers are probably aware that I have criticized Takaichi on a variety of issues. However the numerous viral posts obsessing over her time in Washington and trying to depict her as a massive fraud are ridiculous, and quite frankly embarrassing to read.
While her opponents focus on this very minor issue, Takaichi is busy scoring legislative victories in the Diet. Wouldn't it make more sense for the opposition to organize around important issues that impact the livelihood of the Japanese people?

[zhang haitao @autumnredleaf]

鄧小平79年訪美，約翰丹佛好像給他唱了這首歌

[Brian Berletic @BrianJBerletic]

🇺🇸🇨🇳NEW ARTICLE: US Prepares Terrorist Army to Expand its Dirty War on China

(NOTE: Because X continues censoring links previously banned by Twitter in cooperation with the US State Department including NEO, I am providing the entire article below).

The US media has invested in recent years in rehabilitating Uyghur Chinese extremists now based in Syria, depicting them as “freedom fighters” whose ultimate goal is to “liberate” (carve off) territory in western China, and are preparing to fight China across Eurasia - adding to an already ongoing dirty war the US has been waging against China over the 20th and 21st centuries.

A Familiar Pattern

From the Cold War to present day, the United States has actively created and used the world’s worst terrorist organizations to advance US geopolitical objectives worldwide. This includes the creation and use of Al Qaeda (through local chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood) in the 1970s and 1980s in Syria and their export to Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union until their withdrawal in 1989.

It also includes the use of these same terrorists to divide and disrupt unified resistance to invading US forces in Iraq from 2003 onward, and the eventual region-wide US reordering of the Arab World spanning Libya and Egypt in North Africa to Yemen and Syria in the MIddle East beginning under the likewise US-engineered “Arab Spring” in 2011.

From North Africa to Central Asia, the US has admittedly utilized terrorist organizations listed by the US State Department itself as such, to both target nations the US military cannot attack directly and to serve as a pretext for US invasions and occupations in nations the US seeks to attack more directly.

Other episodes in which this US strategy has been employed include against both Russia in its southern Caucasus region and even as far as China in East Asia.

While both Russia and China appear to have successfully neutralized this malicious method of proxy warfare utilized by Washington within their respective borders, the US continues not only arming and building up terrorist forces for future conflicts, but is also shaping public perception to depict such use of US-sponsored terrorism as somehow supporting “freedom fighters” against “authoritarian” governments.

US Media Reintroducing Uyghur Terrorists as “Freedom Fighters”

A troubling sign that the US continues seeking to use extremists specifically tailored for attacking China and its investments and projects across Eurasia, is a May 2026 National Public Radio (NPR) article titled, “The foreign fighters who helped topple Assad — and why China worries about them.”

The article - only the latest of many spanning recent years - portrays the largest segment of foreign fighters involved in the US-backed overthrow of Syria in 2024 - Uyghur extremists from China’s western region of Xinjiang - as simply fleeing persecution in China and incidentally ending up aligned with and fighting alongside Al Qaeda.

The article mentions the previously US State Department-designated foreign terrorist organization (until June 2025) Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) Uyghur fighters were recruited into as an Al Qaeda affiliate which ultimately overran Syrian forces in 2024, toppling the Syrian government.

HTS’ figurehead Abu Mohammad al-Jolani (now referred to as Ahmed al-Sharaa) has even been designated as Syria’s defacto president by the US and its proxies and has even been invited to the White House by current US President Donald Trump despite previously having a 10 million USD reward on his head by the US government itself.

The moral flexibility of the US regarding Al Qaeda based on whether the US is trying to justify direct military intervention in Syria before the government’s collapse or cement a terrorist-led proxy regime afterwards is the central hallmark of the decades-spanning use by Washington of terrorist organizations to target, undermine, topple, then politically capture targeted nations.

It is no coincidence that the US not only recruited thousands of Uyghur extremists to fight alongside HTS in its proxy war against the Syrian government, but now seeks to redeploy this battle-hardened, experienced force of extremists across Eurasia as part of its ongoing dirty war against China.

The NPR article, in regards to thousands of battle-hardened Uyghur extremists, stated:

They say they now hope to preserve their culture and perhaps one day raise an army powerful enough to seize control of Xinjiang, or East Turkestan as the Uyghurs call it, the region that the Uyghurs consider their homeland and that the Chinese Communist Party took control of in 1949.

Of course, Xinjiang had been part of China for centuries and only briefly during the 20th century found itself adrift as part of the US-European imposed “century of humiliation” China experienced before its rise in the last 20th and now 21st century - history Washington finds an inconvenience regarding narratives it is building ahead of justifying the next wave of terrorism being prepared across Eurasia and against China itself.

Radicalizing and Ravaging China’s Xinjiang and Beyond

Today, NPR pretends the circumstances surrounding violence in China’s Xinjiang region involving radicalized Uyghurs is ambiguous, claiming it began with student protests demanding the investigation into clashes between Uyghur and Han factory workers. The article only barely touches on the violent nature of Uyghur extremism in Xinjiang (which radiated far beyond the region in subsequent years).

In reality, the Western media has admitted in past years to a concerted campaign of targeted radicalization of China’s Uyghur population in its western Xinjiang region.

The LA Times in a 2016 article titled, “In China, rise of Salafism fosters suspicion and division among Muslims,” indicates the radicalization of Uyghurs not only created tensions with the Chinese government and non-Uyghur ethnic groups in Xinjiang, but also among Uyghur Muslims themselves.

The article describes the process as originating from Washington’s close Persian Gulf ally, Saudi Arabia, claiming:

“Saudi preachers and organizations began traveling to China. Some of them bore gifts: training programs for clerics, Korans for distribution, funding for new "Islamic institutes" and mosques.

"This exposure to Saudi discourses actually caused a momentary implosion within the Salafi community in the 1980s," said Mohammed Al-Sudairi, a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong who spent years researching Salafi Muslims in China.

"The new generation, which was much more engaged and influenced by Saudi Arabia, began to contest the knowledge of the older generation. You had a lot of excommunication within the [Muslim] community, people were saying to each other that they were not real Muslims."”

In other words, despite Washington accusing Beijing of “genocide” in Xinjiang, parathetically meaning “cultural genocide” of what Washington claims is Uyghur culture, it was the US through its Saudi proxies erasing indigenous Uyghur culture and overwriting it with imported, politically-driven Salafist extremism that demonstrably exploded into armed, widespread violence targeting China’s stability.

While this violence is deliberately omitted from Western narratives today regarding Xinjiang - specifically to amplify the illusion Beijing’s subsequent security measures were arbitrary and unwarranted - at the height of the violence between 2009-2015, the Western media eagerly reported on spiraling violence Beijing seemed unable to control.

The BBC in a 2014 article titled, “Why is there tension between China and the Uighurs?,” documented a long list of extremist-driven terrorism both across Xinjiang and wider China.

The article noted:

“…things really escalated in 2009, with large-scale ethnic rioting in the regional capital, Urumqi. Some 200 people were killed in the unrest, most of them Han Chinese, according to officials.

Security was increased and many Uighurs detained as suspects. But violence rumbled on as right groups increasingly pointed to tight control by Beijing.

In June 2012, six Uighurs reportedly tried to hijack a plane from Hotan to Urumqi before they were overpowered by passengers and crew.

There was bloodshed in April 2013 and in June that year, 27 people died in Shanshan county after police opened fire on what state media described as a mob armed with knives attacking local government buildings.”

The article then briefly attempted to suggest the details of the attacks were difficult to verify in an attempt to deny Beijing justification for increased security to deal with the violence - however - most of the attacks described in the BBC article had been captured on security cameras, documenting the undeniable brutality of the radicalized violence.

The article continued:

“At least 31 people were killed and more than 90 suffered injuries in May 2014 when two cars crashed through an Urumqi market and explosives were tossed into the crowd. China called it a "violent terrorist incident".

It followed a bomb and knife attack at Urumqi's south railway station in April, which killed three and injured 79 others.

In July, authorities said [attacks were carried out on] government offices in Yarkant, leaving 96 dead. The imam of China's largest mosque, Jume Tahir, was stabbed to death days later.

In September about 50 died in blasts in Luntai county outside police stations, a market and a shop. Details of both incidents are unclear and activists have contested some accounts of incidents in state media.

Some violence has also spilled out of Xinjiang. A March stabbing spree in Kunming in Yunnan province that killed 29 people was blamed on Xinjiang separatists, as was an October 2013 incident where a car ploughed into a crowd and burst into flames in Beijing's Tiananmen Square.”

The extensive but by no means exhaustive list the BBC published of violence carried out by radicalized Uyghurs left a path of death and destruction from Xinjiang to Beijing - with attacks just as likely to kill fellow Uyghurs as they were other ethnic groups and government employees.

The violence eventually radiated beyond China itself with a bomb blast in 2015 targeting central Bangkok, the capital of Thailand, following the Thai government’s refusal of US government demands that Uyghur terror suspects be allowed to travel onward to Turkey to join US-backed terrorist forces fighting in neighboring Syria instead of being sent back to China to face justice.

Chinese security and development policies successfully managed to bring the cycle of radicalization and violence to an end, rehabilitating and deprograming extremists before providing them job training and allowing them to return to society. China also invested heavily in economic development across Xinjiang to drain the pools of poverty and unemployment that had primed the local population for radicalization in the first place.

However, this did not happen before thousands of Uyghur extremists were transplanted by the US from western China to West Asia where they were armed, trained, and battle-hardened in the US-backed overthrow of Syria spanning 2011-2024, where they now await redeployment against both China itself and Chinese-backed investments, infrastructure projects, and diplomatic missions across Eurasia.

Resurrecting and Rebranding Washington’s Anti-China Terror Front

Just as the US has done with other terrorist organizations, including HTS in Syria and the notorious Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) of Iran, Uyghur terrorist organization, the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), previously listed by the US State Department as foreign terrorist organizations have been “delisted” as of 2020.

The DW in their article, “US removes China-condemened group from terror list,” claims, “China regularly points to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement to justify its crackdown in Muslim majority Xinjiang. The US removed it from the terror list, saying there's "no credible evidence" that it still exists.”

The article further explains that, “"ETIM was removed from the list because, for more than a decade, there has been no credible evidence that ETIM continues to exist," a State Department spokesperson said, news agency AFP reported.”

Yet, just 2 years earlier - well within “more than a decade,” US Central Command itself admitted to strikes on ETIM terrorists in Afghanistan which shares a short section of border with neighboring China - exposing the US State Department’s justification for delisting ETIM as a blatant lie.

Just as was the case with HTS and MEK, the Chinese Uyghur terrorist organization ETIM was delisted not because it no longer exists or is no longer engaged in terrorism, but because the US seeks to legitimize that terrorism and more openly aid and abet it.

The US is already waging a dirty war against China across Eurasia including backing Baluch terrorists in southwest Pakistan and armed militants in the Southeast Asian country of Myanmar - both of whom are striking at Chinese-backed infrastructure projects, attacking Chinese investments, and in Pakistan, killing Chinese engineers along with an attempt to kill the Chinese ambassador to Pakistan in 2021.

Uyghur extremists transplanted by the US to topple Syria in West Asia are now openly being prepared by Washington to work their way back east toward China to augment this already ongoing dirty war the US is waging against China, its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), investments, citizens, and diplomatic missions, as well as China’s friends and partners everywhere in between.

Part of these preparations include the US media itself reinventing previously US-designated terrorists into “freedom fighters” in the hopes of not only building public and political support for Washington’s armed proxies, but to depict China’s inevitable attempts to defend itself against this latest hostility aimed at it, as “authoritarianism” and even “aggression.”

Only time will tell if China’s rise and attempts to build up the multipolar world can outpace Washington's attempts to undermine China and tear the multipolar world down. In the meantime, Washington has readied yet another piece to place upon this global chess board - one that threatens nations across Eurasia and demands Eurasia-wide security cooperation with China to defend against.

Brian Berletic is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer.

[Miju咪啾 @_miuj_9]

女子晒出连续5天上班穿搭，5套衣服5种风格，一天比一天惊艳，一套比一套好看！评论区神回复：她的衣柜像服装店，我的衣柜像缓存文件夹🤣

[魏清洛 @yxiomn920165]

我用手都玩不明白的事，他居然用脚…

[Lyle Goldstein @lylegoldstein]

This is an enlightening analysis by @NiharikaSM and @joyuwang. It is important to understand this step-by-step increase in pressure enabled by the growth of Chinese naval and maritime forces.

I found this part of the article to be particularly interesting: "Operating to Taiwan’s east allows China to study the waters there, potentially uncovering hiding spots for enemy submarines, Dahm said. In a conflict, that would also have implications for U.S. forces if they joined the defense of Taiwan. It would be harder for American subs to sneak up on Chinese navy ships arrayed off Taiwan’s eastern seaboard." I agree that the relatively lightly defended eastern side of Taiwan may increasingly be where a decisive engagement could be fought.

One point I might add to this solid discussion is that the high frequency of PLA Navy and CCG ops around Taiwan could also help in lulling Taiwan's defenders by normalizing a very heavy Chinese presence in proximate waters, and thus assist in masking a possible genuine attack too. Folks examining the cross-Strait balance should study up on RK Betts 1982 treatise on surprise attack that concludes: "...attempts to achieve military surprise in the initial phase of war usually succeeds."

He further concludes: "All major suddent attacks occurred in situations of prolonged tensions, during which the victim state's leaders recognized that war might be on the horizon. Surprise succeeded despite ample political warning ..."

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

转发

白俄罗斯已经把话挑明了：中国真正的杀招不是“东风”，也不是航母，而是“不着急”！

这话听起来有点反常识，毕竟在多数人的认知里，大国较量拼的就是坚船利炮，比的就是谁拳头更硬、谁火力更猛。

可其实真正决定最终走向的，是谁能守住自己的节奏，不被对手牵着鼻子走。

很多人对“不着急”有误解，觉得这是动作慢、没底气，其实恰恰相反，真正的“不着急”，是不被情绪裹挟，不被对手挑动，始终按照自己的路线稳步推进，绝不因为外界的杂音就乱了方寸。

这些年美国变着法给中国制造麻烦：贸易战打了一轮又一轮，科技制裁层层加码，在台海、南海不停拱火挑事，今天派军舰闯岛礁，明天拉着盟友搞联合军演，甚至动不动就打台湾牌切香肠。

说白了核心目的只有一个——逼中国出手，打乱中国发展的节奏，把中国拖进对抗的泥潭里。

换做很多国家，面对这种接二��三的挑衅，要么忍不住硬碰硬硬刚到底，要么被牵着鼻子跟着对方的节奏走，最后把自己的发展节奏全搭进去。

但中国的应对始终稳得超乎对手想象：你拱你的火，我干我的事。

贸易战来了，我们对等反制但不扩大事态，一边稳住外贸基本盘，一边继续扩大对外开放；科技制裁来了，我们没有急着喊口号放狠话，而是沉下心补产业链短板，一步一个脚印搞自主研发。

台海挑衅来了，我们底线寸步不让，常态化巡航、军事演训稳步推进，一点点压缩分裂势力的空间，但绝不会因为对方的刻意挑唆就贸然冲动。

这种你越急我越稳、你越挑事我越按自己节奏走的劲，才是让对手最头疼的地方。

“不着急”之所以能成为杀招，因为大国博弈本质上是持久战，拼的不是一时的火力强��，而是耐力、韧性和内部稳定性。

美国的霸权逻辑，从来都是靠制造紧张、挑动冲突来获利，靠把别人搞乱来维持自己的优势。

它最擅长的是速战速决，靠局部冲突拖垮对手，最怕的就是对手不接招，一拳打在棉花上，最后自己耗不起。

当年苏联就是被美国的军备竞赛牵着鼻子走，乱了自己的发展节奏，最后内部崩盘，教训不可谓不深刻。

而中国的“不着急”，恰恰是跳出了对手设下的博弈框架，不跟着对方的剧本走，让对方的招数全都打空。

中国能做到“不着急”，背后是实打实的家底，和刻在骨子里的战略文化打底。

我们有全世界最完整的工业体系、超大规模的国内市场，让我们有足够强的抗风险能力，外部风吹浪打，内部经济民生的基本盘稳得住，不用急着孤注一掷赌国运。

���就是战略文化的底色，中国人历来讲究“谋定而后动”“后发制人”，不逞一时之勇，不图口舌之快，看重的是长远的胜负，不是眼前的输赢。

从建国初期在封锁中隐忍搞建设，到改革开放几十年韬光养晦谋发展，我们从来都是盯着自己的长远目标往前走，不会因为路边的杂音就改道，更不会因为别人的挑唆就乱了步伐。

“不着急”是不到万不得已不轻易出手，是把战争的选择权、节奏的主动权牢牢握在自己手里，什么时候出手、打到什么程度，全由我们说了算。

东风和航母是我们硬实力的底牌，是用来托住底气的；而“不着急”的战略定力，是用来赢下长远博弈的杀招。

有硬底牌托底，才有稳得住的资格；有稳得住的定力，才能把硬实力的作用发挥到极致。

看看当下的国际局势就更清楚了，美国现在到处拉帮��派、四处制造冲突，本质上是自己内部出了问题，着急通过外部矛盾转移视线，着急打乱新兴国家的发展节奏。

这时候谁先沉不住气，谁先乱了阵脚，谁就输了一半，中国的“不着急”，恰恰戳中了美国的软肋。

时间从来都站在我们这边，只要我们自己不犯错，踏踏实实走好自己的路，实力的天平只会越来越向我们倾斜。

如此看来，“不着急”是一种极度的战略自信，是一种以我为主的博弈智慧，我们有东风护疆，有航母守海，更有足够的耐心和定力做好自己的事。

大国博弈的终点，不属于张牙舞爪、四处拱火的冒进者，而属于稳扎稳打、步步为营的长期主义者，守住自己的节奏，不被对手牵着走，时间最终会给出最公正的答案。

[Cindy｜日本观察与服饰商业 @cindychoi_26]

《泰晤士报》是英国非常主流、面向政商精英的媒体。它用 fawning 这个词，是在传递一种带讽刺意味的判断：高市在面对外国领导人时，显得过度兴奋、讨好，甚至削弱了首相应有的距离感。文章把她对白宫、英国首相、韩国总统、菲律宾总统的多个画面串在一起，形成了一个很清楚的国际媒体叙事：“日本首相在强势男性领导人面前过于用力地经营亲近感。”

评论区里日本人对高市骂声一片，讨厌日本对美国的结构性依附被她演得太直白。

这篇文章并没有完全站在批评者一边，而是提出另一种解释：高市是日本第一位女首相，在一个长期由男性、而且相当保守的自民党体系中一路爬上来，她的热情、夸奖、让对方舒服的能力，可能不是单纯的性格，而是一种长期内化的生存策略。御茶水女子大学学者 Shin Ki-young 对《朝日新闻》的解释是：这类表现可被看作她在男性主导保守政党里形成的生存战术。

文章里提到一个细节：她3月去华盛顿时，特朗普对盟友没有参与中东战争很不满；但高市离开时，日本没有被施压派兵到中东。报道把这当成她这种亲密式外交可能带来的实际收益。

之前高市��特朗普在G7晚宴上似乎有争吵，说明她对特朗普的公开亲近，也许并不代表真正顺从。

[空空道人 @Kongkongda5882]

2019年，孙小果被绳之以法，当时云南省第一监狱原纪委书记的何绍平居功至伟，如果没有他，大家根本不可能看到事情的真相，十几个人只有他一个人坚持原则，最终孙小果调到了别的监狱，才可以减刑。

孙小果1998年因强奸、强制侮辱妇女等多项罪名一审被判处死刑，1999年二审改判死缓，之后进入云南省第一监狱服刑，他的母亲孙鹤予和继父李桥忠一直四处托关系，想帮他违规减刑早点出狱。

李桥忠找到时任云南省监狱管理局政委罗正云，两人既是老乡又是战友，罗正云答应帮忙，直接给第一监狱相关负责人打招呼，授意监狱方面配合给孙小果办理减刑手续。

当时第一监狱不少管理人员都顺着领导的意思操作，给孙小果特殊待遇，每个月考核都打满分，连续七年评上劳动改造积极分子，接连申请减刑，到了纪委审核环节，何绍平直接提出了反对意见。

何绍平的理由很明确，孙小果的减刑不符合司法部和最高法、最高检的相关规定，说白了就是，正常服刑的犯人根本拿不到这么多连续满分考核，这里面明显有人为操作的空间，流程不合规就不能通过。

罗正云知道后，专门给何绍平打了电话过问这件事，话里话外都是让他通融一下，换成别人可能就顺着上级的意思办了，但何绍平挂了电话之后，再开减刑讨论会还是坚持不同意。

何绍平后来接受采访时说，自己不图什么，就是要依法办事，领导觉得他不行可以把他换了，但纪委书记的职责就是要监督这件事，就因为他一个人死扛，孙小果在第一监狱的减刑彻底推进不下去了。

眼看在第一监狱卡了壳，罗正云和李桥忠等人想了个绕开的办法——把孙小果转到云南省第二监狱，2009年1月，孙小果正式转监，换了个地方��后没人再拦着，减刑流程走得异常顺利。

算下来，孙小果在第一监狱一共减刑3次，转到第二监狱之后又减刑2次，2010年4月就出狱了，原本死缓的刑期，他实际只坐了12年5个月的牢，出来之后换了身份在昆明经营夜店、混社会。

这里面还有个离谱的操作，就是所谓的“发明专利立功”。孙小果家人从外面找了防盗窨井盖的设计图纸，通过监狱干警带进去，找同监懂技术的犯人做模型、代写材料，算成孙小果的发明。

按照规定，服刑人员有重大发明创造可以认定为立功，能申请减刑，但这个专利从设计到制作全是别人代劳的，孙小果自己连图纸都画不出来，本质就是为了减刑造假的材料。

2019年扫黑除恶专项斗争中，孙小果涉黑团伙被打掉，他的真实身份曝光，背后的保护伞也被连根拔起，最终19名涉事公职人员被判处两年到二十年不等的有期徒刑，孙小果也在2020年2月被依法执行死刑。

[KUNLUN昆侖 @Kunluntalk]

TMD，卡塔尔的代表，进场后，直接无视了万斯，跳过万斯，去和巴基斯坦总理拥抱，然后，万斯竟然再次伸出手，准备去握手，再一次被拒。

我简直是无语了…

[阿飞#业余评论家 @qwerflyfree]

端午节听朋友说，曾任济南市委常委、副市长的徐群（正厅级）在南方闯荡了几年后，回到济南的一家中小规模的民营企业上班了，成为了和大家一样的打工牛马。
徐群曾经是山东省最年轻的正厅级干部之一，2019年，在王忠林办公室汇报工作时，因办事不力，被火爆的忠林书记打了一巴掌。被打后不堪受辱，辞职下海。
下海后，他过得不如之前风光，很多人认为他不应该因为扇耳光就辞职，但在我看来，在纪委高强度��腐的背景下，辞职下海可能反而让自己有了一个好的结局。
#王忠林 #徐群

[王局拍案 @wangjupaian]

【博尔顿曝川普会晤金正恩密事：邀金正恩坐专机、会后称两人“坠入爱河”】

6月20日，美国前国家安全顾问博尔顿透露：

1. 川普曾提出让金正恩搭乘“空军一号”返回平壤，此举让在场人员十分震惊。

2. 会见金正恩后，川普告诉博尔顿：“我和金正恩坠入爱河了（fell in love）。”对此博尔顿只能回应：“好的，老板。”

3. 川普习惯把国际关系理解为领导人之间的私人关系。例如，如果他和普京是好朋友，那么在他看来，美俄关系就是好的。