@WarrenSteinley This - because it clearly ignores the refunds which for most people exceed the pollution charge - is either evidence of gross ignorance or a straight-line lie. I hope it is the former, but neither offers confidence that we have competent representation in parliament
Nigel farage wants you to think that Britain has an immigration problem.
It doesn't.
Britain had a problem with millionaires hoarding wealth, egged on by politicians and the press.
Britain has a problem with racism.
Britain has a @Nigel_Farage problem.
RT if you agree.
@dragonfly_jenny@SaskParty Glad to see that the NDP is prepared (at least for now) to run a candidate who isn't running scared of saskparty irrationalism
@tammyrobert@kaitlynharveysk@Sask_NDP What was the NDP response to SaskPower at the time? It's not as if they paid any serious attention to climate science when they regained power (with the honourable exception of Peter Prebble).
@rexglacer A piece of advice: before posting check you understand what you are talking about. In this case, find a dictionary and look up the word "rebate"
@JeremyPatzerMP Proof, yet again, that some MPs don't understand the first thing about the things they rant about. If @JeremyPatzerMP had any intellectual curiosity he would be asking how countries around the world run more reliable grids than SK with much higher proportions of windpower.
@TaraSample1 @kaitlynharveysk If you're in a riding with a decent Green candidate you have a chance to send a message to both of the extractivist parties
@kaitlynharveysk@emi_eaton I've been equivocating as to whether to participate. Would it encourage science-compatible policy development from the NDP or would it just feed the ability to say they would do just a little better than "don't care" Moe? I suspect it's the latter so I'm not joining in.
@habpipes@kaitlynharveysk and independent monitoring of CH4 emissions shows figures vastly greater than the ones provided by industry. See for example https://t.co/2h9HkxXiTF
@Pipeline_Online Skilled and sophisticated rhetoric which ignores where the science of the climate crisis is very clearly pointing. As now agreed by all serious science-based authorities worldwide, expansion of o&g operations is not a "victimless crime" but poses an existential threat.
@BrettDolter Even the best analysts will produce faulty results if they are provided with faulty input assumptions. GIGO. And will produce irrelevant results if the priorities given them for what is to be achieved totally miss the point - e.g. GDP instead of global survival
@Pipeline_Online@eggermac Yeah, so useless that just about every major jurisdiction in the world is expanding its wind fleet. Denmark met 63% of its electricity demand with wind and solar (mostly wind) last year. With a reliability level (SAIDI) an order of magnitude better than SK's