Jesse LeBel

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@ABProsperityPrj Is this a joke?

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@StephenPunwasi If it sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck its money laundering or something.

[Jeffrey Rath @JeffreyRWRath]

BREAKING - Foothills, Ab

If @ABDanielleSmith enacts the Firearms license regulation set out below I swear that I will never say a bad word about her ever again.

Alberta Firearms Act - Firearms Licensing Regulation

1. Any Alberta Resident that possesses a valid Canadian Firearms Possession Acquisition License or Restricted Firearms Possession Acquisition License from Canada shall be issued an Alberta Firearms License by a licensed Alberta Registry.

2. An Alberta firearms license shall be the only license required in Alberta, to acquire, own, use, and possess a firearm in Alberta.

3. Such licence shall be issued for the life of the firearms license holder, subject only to an order of a court of competent jurisdiction deeming the licensee to be a danger to themselves or others either on criminal charge, criminal conviction or issuance of a warrant under the Mental Health Act where the health and safety of persons is at immediate or potential risk from firearms related violence.

4. A licensee under this regulation may own, and safely use any firearm in their possession including all firearms listed or scheduled as prohibited or restricted by the government of Canada.

5. Alberta licensed firearms owners are free to use and convey firearms to shooting ranges or such other locations as are required for the use of such firearms without further license or permit provided that restricted weapons are unloaded, carried in a locked case with appropriate trigger locks or safety mechanisms while being transported to the place of use.

6. Licensed firearms owners are specifically permitted to safely utilize firearms "restricted or prohibited" by Canada on any land or property in Alberta that they own or have a right of access to where firearms may be discharged safely.

7. Any firearm with an overall length of over 660 mm (26") shall be be non-restricted regardless of any previous Canadian designation with the exception of fully automatic firearms or explosive projectile type weapons.

8. The category of "Restricted" firearms shall be limited to all firearms with an overall length of less than 660 mm or 26".

9. A restricted firearms licensee shall be able to own, sell, transfer and possess all firearms in this category without limitation other than that sales and transfers are limited to persons with a valid Alberta Firearms License.

10. Anyone selling or transferring a firearm to any person not holding a valid Canadian or Alberta firearms licence shall be liable for a fine not to exceed 100,000.00 or a custodial sentence of two years less a day in an appropriate Alberta facility.

11. All Alberta Residents over the age of 16 not currently licensed by Canada to possess or acquire a firearm may apply for an Alberta firearms license and shall have an Alberta Firearms License granted to them by an Alberta Registry upon proof of residency in Alberta, an up to date criminal background check along with a vulnerable sector search and parental consent if applicable in the case of a minor, along with proof of completion of an approved firearms safety course.

12. No license under this regulation shall in any way permit any person to own, acquire, possess, transport or operate a fully automatic firearm or weapon firing explosive projectiles other for military or police purposes or under such authority or special license as be issued.

13. Any person licensed under this regulation apprehended with a firearm that has been converted to fire as a fully automatic firearm shall be subject to immediate revocation of their Alberta Firearms License and ALL applicable Alberta and Canadian Criminal Penalties shall apply.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT PROPERTY RIGHTS AND GUN RIGHTS PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO [email protected]

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@Prolotario1 Your thoughts on Kr1st1n's reply?

[Włodzimierz Wrzosek @wlw_wlw55]

Good Beginnings of Evil
It is the year 1877. A young 24-year-old Englishman, Cecil John Rhodes, lies under the African sky in Kimberley, battling tuberculosis that was soon supposed to kill him.
In this moment of crisis, beneath the bush stars, he writes his “Confession of Faith” – a confession that would become the foundation of one of the most ambitious visions in human history.
“Why should we stop?” Rhodes asks himself.
“The British are the best race to rule the world. We must take as much of the planet as possible in order to spread our civilization, law, and order.”
This was no ordinary dreamer. Rhodes was a visionary with an iron will – a man who, within two decades, built a diamond empire (founding De Beers in 1888, achieving a near-monopoly on 90% of the world’s diamonds), became Prime Minister of the Cape Colony, and almost single-handedly redrew the map of Africa.
Rhodes was a loner – he never married, never had children. His life was an unrelenting pursuit of greatness.
In southern Africa he saw not only riches, but destiny: “from the Cape to Cairo” – one vast British territory carrying railways, education, law and order to “barbarous” peoples.
He quoted Rudyard Kipling and his “White Man’s Burden” – the civilizing mission. The Boer War (1899–1902), the failed Jameson Raid (1895, a coup attempt against the Transvaal) – all of it was for the expansion of empire. “Remember that you are Englishmen,” he told soldiers, “and that you have won the grand lottery of life.”
Rhodes was a pragmatist, but also an idealist.
He believed that the Anglo-Saxon race represented “the highest form of government”, capable of “improving the world”.
In 1890 he founded the British South Africa Company – a private army and administration that conquered the territories of present-day Zambia and Zimbabwe (named Rhodesia in his honour).
He was brutal – he suppressed Matabele uprisings, exploited natives – but in his eyes this was merely the price of progress.
In 1902, dying at the age of 48 in his cottage overlooking the ocean in Muizenberg, he drew up a will that would change history forever. His enormous fortune (millions of pounds from diamond and gold mines) he bequeathed to the Rhodes Trust – a foundation funding scholarships at Oxford for the most talented young people from the Empire, the United States and Germany.
The goal was clear: to educate an elite that would carry forward his dream – Anglo-Saxon unity, global order under Western leadership. “More of the world British” – that was his mantra.
Together with friends – Lord Alfred Milner (high colonial official, later High Commissioner for Southern Africa) and powerful financiers such as Nathaniel Rothschild – he founded the Round Table: a secret elite discussion network. Meetings took place in luxurious residences, thick with cigar smoke and the scent of whisky.
It was there that the vision of a federation of British dominions, a common foreign policy, and a “peaceful” world order was born. This was no ordinary club. It was the seed of something much larger – a mechanism for building influence, a network meant to shape the future of the world.
At first, everything seemed noble. Rhodes Scholarships attracted geniuses – future leaders who were to “improve the world”. The Round Table inspired think-tanks such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House in London, founded 1920) and the Council on Foreign Relations in the USA (1921).
It was a subtle, elite network with a civilizing mission. Rhodes believed that education and Anglo-Saxon unity would bring the world peace and progress.
But after Rhodes’s death something broke. His legacy fell into the hands of people who lacked his lofty vision, but possessed an insatiable thirst for absolute power. The noble idea of “improving the world” veered into dark alleys. Eugenics crept in – the science of “improving the human race” through selection.
Francis Galton, Darwin’s cousin, inspired it all;
Rhodes financially supported these ideas. Sterilization of the “unfit”, euthanasia of the disabled, the concept of a “master race” – all of this flourished in British and American elite circles in the early 20th century.
These ideas found their most horrific culmination in Nazism. The Hitlerites did not invent it themselves – they drew from Anglo-Saxon sources.
American sterilization laws (in 32 states) inspired the Nuremberg Laws. “Master race”, death camps, the genocide of millions – this was no longer civilization; it was barbarism in the name of progress.
After the war, Nazism did not disappear. Thanks to Operation Paperclip, hundreds of Nazi scientists were brought to the United States – Wernher von Braun to NASA, others to the CIA and leading universities.
Their ideas went underground within Western structures, transferring the vision of social control under the guise of science and security.

The Hidden Network and Transatlantic Dominance

Since the end of World War II, the world order has not been shaped by open superpower conflicts, but by a hidden network of transatlantic elites, with the dominant role played by British establishment circles.
The formal collapse of the British Empire was merely a façade – real power moved to a supranational level, where institutions such as Chatham House, the City of London as the global financial centre, and associated intelligence and business networks took control of the West.
The United States became in this system a “controllable giant” – a military and economic tool for realizing the goals of elites who designed the post-war order: the Bretton Woods system with the dollar as the reserve currency under the control of the City of London, NATO and the UN as coordination mechanisms.
This transatlantic arrangement did not serve the sovereignty of nations, but their long-term agenda: centralization of power, weakening of Christian civilization through secularization and depopulation, maintenance of controlled conflicts that justified the existence of global institutions.
A significant element of this strategy was the dismantling of American industrial capacity, begun in the 1970s under Jimmy Carter’s administration.
It was a deliberate, calculated shift: through deregulation policies, trade agreements and offshoring incentives, American heavy industry and manufacturing were systematically moved to China, providing cheap labour and turning Beijing into the factory of the world.

At the same time, the United States was systematically indebted – growing budget deficits and public debt financed by bond issuance, which the elites used to maintain financial control.
Ever larger streams of American taxpayer money flowed through NGOs, foundations and international organizations to finance a broad reconstruction of societies across most of the world.
This reconstruction covered moral, cultural, value and generational consciousness spheres: promotion of gender ideology, deconstruction of the family, moral relativism and anti-national narratives.
The goal was clear – by dismantling the traditional family and its associated values (loyalty, patriotism, Christian ethics) to bring about the collapse of the nation-state concept, replacing it with an amorphous mass of global consumers under the control of supranational structures.
The elites drew inspiration from ideas emerging on increasingly left-leaning Western universities – from the Frankfurt School of critical theory to contemporary postcolonial and ecological theories – which served as intellectual justification for this transformation.
This process killed two birds with one stone: first, it provided the elites with a “safe” source of funding for their programme, sustaining and developing mechanisms beneficial to them (such as global climate funds or “sustainable development” programmes); second, it created an internal crisis in the United States, which the elites perceived as a threat to their plan.
The United States, with its First Amendment (freedom of speech) and Second Amendment (right to bear arms), constituted a bastion of resistance to centralization of power – hence the deliberate weakening through deindustrialization, debt and cultural erosion.
China, presented as an autonomous multipolar rival, is not a true opponent, but a controlled force – a front of the same structure. After 1945, British elites, through historical connections (Hong Kong as a financial stronghold, HSBC as a bridge between East and West), supported China’s rise as a counterweight to both the USA and the USSR.
Deng Xiaoping’s reforms opened Beijing to Western technology transfer, but on condition of integration into the global financial system dominated by the City of London.
Chinese investments in sanctioned regimes (over $100 billion in Venezuela, the $400 billion pact with Iran) serve to circumvent sanctions, launder money and control energy – not an independent strategy, but the maintenance of tension that justifies militarism and shifts power to the supranational level.
The events of January 2026 – the precise U.S. strike in Venezuela (capture of Nicolás Maduro on January 3 in a special operation), pressure on Iran amid internal protests, and management of the Gaza escalation – are not chaotic reactions, but a strategic dismantling of precisely this system.
The Trump administration is waging a dispersed war on several fronts:
External front: the China–Russia–Iran–Venezuela axis (with proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah), challenging dollar hegemony through alternative trade routes and BRICS+ alliances.
Internal front: the transatlantic globalist establishment that hinders sovereign national development and promotes dark objectives under the pretext of “world peace”.
The strike on Venezuela – a hub for Iran in the Western Hemisphere, a platform for Chinese investment and money laundering – weakens China’s proxy, exposes its assets and sends a signal: the era of empty threats is over.
Similarly, pressure on Iran (threats of intervention amid protests) and control over Gaza (stripping away moral high-ground narrative) dismantle the ecosystem in which China poses as defender of the Global South.
For British-European elites this is an existential catastrophe: they are losing control over the “controllable giant” USA and their proxy tools.
The frustration on both sides – globalists lamenting the loss of influence and escalation by the “axis” – is a theatre of dialectics, where China as a front does not risk open conflict because it is not yet the brain, but serves the elites (as does Russia) as a scarecrow.
None of this is random crises – it is the map of a new era: the end of the post-1945 world order, the beginning of the struggle to restore sovereignty to nations and freedom to the world before the dark forces that have been obstructing the normal development of civilization.
America First is becoming an instrument of divine plan – a counter-attack of good against masked evil, restoring balance in a multipolar world, halting the rise of an autocratically led multipolar camp directed by deeply degenerated “elites”.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@brianlilley @DwightNewmanLaw The land originally became privately owned because the gov't sold it to settelers, or the railroads sold the land to settlers after being gifted it by the gov't to finance the railroads. Make it make sense.

[CCFR/CCDAF @CCFR_CCDAF]

Please sign e-7232 (Justice)
👉 https://t.co/XWR0A6LLiJ

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@llorisThellama @NoLimitGains @grok. What is Vix?

[Rise Of Alberta @RiseOfAlberta]

Long one. 17 minutes.

But it’s one of the best breakdowns I’ve seen of what Canada could look like if Alberta leaves.

Alberta exits → Saskatchewan follows → Quebec votes → BC charts its own path → And ironically... Ontario could become the 51st state.

#AlbertaIndependence

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@alandrummond2 You tell 'em. Dr. Drummond! .. Now do mandatory Vaccines!

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@Prolotario1 Hi Ariel. what do you know about how Canada ties in with the cabal connection. The corruption up here is absurd. For the past 11 years the government has only done things to the people as opposed to for the people. Any thoughts?

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@JohnBarlowMP It's called money laundering.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@kowalchukfarms1 Is this like the military bases? Only closing in predominantly conservative riding.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@MichaelJonFucci @Prolotario1 Wow, good job.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@miket136 you couldn't make this stuff up.

[YEGWAVE @yegwave]

Should the Province of Alberta cease to be part of Canada and become an independent state?

Important: please repost to reach a larger sample size after voting 🗳️

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@brianlilley forgot to say, eh.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@catturd2 No, seriously, trade Alberta for Minnesota. Everybody is happy!

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@jkenney Just trade Alberta for Minnesota, everyone gets what they want.

[Jesse LeBel @pppjesse]

@jkenney good trade, Minnesota for Alberta.