@PlayStation Then stop selling digital games for the same price as physical ones too. You're removing the printing, box, and shipping prices from the equation completely so I shouldn't be paying $70 for digital games anymore.
🏴 Women in Scotland, we want to hear from you:
Do you feel safe walking alone?
Has that changed in recent years?
Do you take extra precautions, change your routes, or avoid certain places?
Do you have experiences you could share?
We tax cigarettes to reduce smoking.
We tax alcohol to reduce drinking.
We tax fuel to reduce driving.
What do you think happens when you tax employing people and running a business?
We are all Julia Hartley-Brewer:
HW: “People like you shouldn’t get too involved in medicine, because of the harm you cause”.
JHB: “People like you, and I mean this very respectfully, should be in prison. Genuinely”.
Folic acid to be added into UK food supply. Folic acid more than doubles risk of prostate cancer. The NIH warns cancer patients to steer clear of folic acid. Any of this making sense?
The fact that being 'anti-AC' is an actual political position shows you just how stupid large swathes of humanity are.
It's essentially a pro-death position.
It's as stupid as being against heating in the winter.
BBC just stated the heatwave is “unequivocally because of human induced climate change.” BBC must now provide proof - not consensus, actual
proof - of this ridiculous claim. If they can’t, they’ve broken their impartiality charter again
🔵 Fancy winning the new Rangers home kit?
🔂 Just RT and make sure you're following the Rangers Review on X to be in with a chance.
📅 We'll draw the winner on July 8th.
Here is some footage of Fête de la Musique
In Paris 1998 compared with footage from the June 21, 2026 festival.
The difference is scary.
It's an invasion.
Imagine the scene if you will. A woman. Let's say Narinder Kaur. Walks in to a pub and is surrounded, jostled and jeered by a load of men in England shirts. And is eventually forced physically to leave the pub. Simply because of her political beliefs.
Like Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins was.
My god! The media would go into overdrive. Arrests would be imminent. The pub probably shut down. And a debate held in the houses of Parliament. And I honestly don't think I'm being over dramatic.I think that would happen.
So why is there no outrage for what happened to Katie?
One of the craziest things about the UK rape gang scandal is that it's largely considered a 'right wing' concern.
In a sane, serious country, it would be completely bipartisan. In fact, it wouldn't even be seen as a political issue, but one of basic justice and morality.
EVERY FUCKING PERSON WHO HAS BEEN SCREAMING ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES FOR MONTHS...
...IS DEAD FUCKING SILENT ABOUT A QUARTER-OF-A-MILLION WHITE GIRLS BEING GANG RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!!
I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT WHAT ANY OF YOU FUCKING PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY EVER AGAIN!!!!!!
If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules.
Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead.
Why now?
Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups.
Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences.
This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else.
When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.