Patrick Bateman

Tweeting because my therapist said it’s cheaper than a session

[STAR Boy TARUN @Starboy2079]

Why do different ecosystems support terrorist Umar Khalid?
Here is the reason:

▪️Urban Naxals: Khalid was part of the DSU in JNU, a far-left student group. He was also actively involved with networks linked to the Bhima Koregaon conspiracy. Because of this, India's entire leftist ecosystem stands rock-solid behind him.

▪️The Muslim Establishment: He is the son of Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, a founding member of SIMI (which later evolved into the PFI). Because his father sits on the Central Advisory Council of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and the AIMPLB Executive Committee, he wields massive influence among Indian Muslims.

▪️Pakistan: Pakistan backs terrorist Khalid because his rhetoric echoes their propaganda on Kashmir. He supported Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhat, and chanted the slogan "Bharat tere tukde honge", which aligns directly with Pakistan's long-term mission to divide India.

▪️Global Soros Network: To international actors, Khalid is a tool to defame India. They do not care about him personally; they simply use his case to promote the narrative that "minorities are persecuted in India.

Conclusion:
Ultimately, the interests of multiple anti-India factions converge on this single individual, which explains why the collective voice demanding his release remains so loud and highly organized.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

Yesterday I went to Court date with my Friend.

A Couple standing before the judge.

Judge (To Man): Take her back or pay maintenance. Otherwise I'll send you to jail.

Man: Keeps looking without any expression

Judge: Did you understand what I said? Do you want to go to jail?

Woman: Yes Madam he deserves to go to jail. Only then he will mend his ways.

Judge (To Woman): You shut up. Don't speak in between.

(To Man): Tell me should I send you to jail?

Man: Today I don't have wish to visit jail.

Judge (Dumbfounded): * Looks to her staff * Is this guy for real? What do I tell him. Seems like he isn't understanding anything.

(To Man): Go and bring your advocate.

(To other Advocates): I don't understand. Are these women marrying idiots or are these men becoming idiots after marriage?

Advocates: Madam nowadays the situation is very bad. Remember the Siya Case another one in Agra has surfaced now.

Judge: Seems like women are taking revenge of years of oppression. Anyway it is good for us na. If they finish them off then there is no issue of Alimony Maintenance.

*Laughs loudly *

Entire Court bursts out laughing.

Judicial Circus 🎪 to its best..

[Alpakanya @Alpakanya]

Brutal review of #Alpha, bro killed it 🤣

[Hindutva Knight @HPhobiaWatch]

Allah is punishing them for their rotten heart and blatant hypocrisy

[Kabir Menon @the_psyche_lab]

If a woman's attitude towards household chores (like cooking, cleaning, washing dishes, doing laundry) is - these are oppressive, menial, unpaid labour or inferior work, don't marry her.

She is a woke. She isn't fit to be a wife or mother.

If a man's attitude towards these chores is that these are womens' job and hence, he doesn't need to learn/contribute, don't marry him either.

He is entitled. He too isn't fit to be a husband or father.

These chores are life skills. And skills are not by themselves patriarchical, matriarchichal, or oppressive. Everyone must learn, must know. Every parent must teach their kids. It's your choice if you want to outsource or do it on your own. But, your attitude towards these skills tells a lot about you.

[Mr Sinha @Mrsinha]

We support other countries based on their players or on how good India's relationship is with them.

These people support teams solely based on their religion.

And then the same people call us communal.

I had nothing against Egypt, but seeing these Islamists cry, I'm glad they lost.

[︎ ︎venom @venom1s]

Ayushi, an unemployed baddie hippo, deleted her own mother to get her job.

Her father worked hard his entire life to educate her. He passed away, and her mother got his job.

She wanted her job, so she deleted her.

Feminist girls will say - Omg slay, icon, baddie, diva fr 💅

[Patrick Bateman @Pra_kan]

@AbijitG What the fuck is mild foul 😂😂

[Patrick Bateman @Pra_kan]

@ThatG4m Louis Figo - The Iconic Winger

[Patrick Bateman @Pra_kan]

@tnrags @FIFAWorldCup The man

[Amit Schandillia @Schandillia]

True nepotism, the only kind that deserves any outrage whatsoever, is not a father promoting son in family business. Or a filmmaker picking friend’s daughter over “outsiders.”

True nepotism is a father writing bad laws just to help son’s business 30x in 12 months.

What E-petrol does to cars is a strawman. They want you to fight the strawman. Don’t. X percentage good, y percentage bad, cars before this year, cars before that year…it’s an endless and pointless debate. One day you prove something, the next day some CEO goes on camera with “all’s well,” and you’re left arguing your case with celltards freshly armed with “you know more than Mahindra?”

Don’t fight the strawman.

Fight the only real elephant in the room, pun probably intended.

A sitting minister’s brazen conflict of interest in writing a law that directly and openly benefits his own family, and calling it national interest.

Make this the focal point of the whole affair. How ethanol works and what it does to engines is immaterial. Even if it were liquid gold, and even if all cars were magically P0 compliant, what doesn’t change is that a business went from 20 crore to 500 crore in a space of one year because AND ONLY BECAUSE the owner’s daddy happens to be a cabinet minister.

Debate on that and no amount of genuflecting CEOs would frustrate your argument.

[︎ ︎venom @venom1s]

According to Indian courts,

A wife can abort the child without her husband's consent.

But if she gets pregnant by another man, you are considered the father.

She can abort your child, and you still have to pay alimony and maintenance to her.

Men are slaves in this country.

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

Not taking anything away from Naseer, he is a great actor, but Amitabh is much better. Amitabh is underrated as an actor because his immense superstardom and box-office success overshadow the technical brilliance of his performances.

Naseer is like Pankaj Tripathi: he acts great, but his range is limited. He brings the same restrained persona to most characters, with limited variation in mannerisms and dialogue delivery, while Amitabh is the more complete actor because he has delivered exceptional performances across virtually every genre. He could portray simmering intensity in Deewaar, tragic vulnerability in Anand, effortless comedy in Amar Akbar Anthony and Chupke Chupke, an intense romantic in Silsila and Kabhi Kabhie, emotional depth in Black, and many more.

His iconic dialogue delivery, commanding voice, expressive body language, and ability to excel in both larger-than-life and understated roles make him a more versatile actor than Shah. In one line, Shah wouldn't suit most of the roles Amitabh did, but Amitabh would suit any role that Shah did.

[Patrick Bateman @Pra_kan]

This boils down to the usual tactic smearing entire groups of people and blaming their “education system” the moment they dare challenge your idiotic, reality-detached perspective.
From the age of 18, the girl was deep into drinking, partying, and sleeping around. She went on multiple trips with her boyfriend, staying in hotels, and later extracted 1 crore from her fiancé. Then, allegedly, she meticulously planned and executed his murder all while lacking the basic courage to confront her own parents about her choices.
And yet, a so-called “critical analysis” from an ex-corporate employee turned renowned soft porn writer concludes that this accused is nothing more than an oppressed victim who was “forced” into it. Genius 🫡

[Gabbar @GabbbarSingh]

Siya took 1 crore from her husband and gave it to her boyfriend.

If this was a girl who was forced into a marriage, and wanted out, would she ever take more favours from the family?

She said yes, coz she wanted money, which her father would never have given without asking for reasons. These are just facts that are out.

Don’t make it her some martyr. Also don’t let beyond their expiry date writers like Chetan Bhagat & Shobha De recharge their relevance batteries.

[︎ ︎venom @venom1s]

She was partying, drinking, and sleeping around since the age of 18.

She was going on trips with her boyfriend and staying in hotels.

But sure, she was oppressed and forced?

Why did she take ₹1 crore from Ketan?

Simps like you are one of the reasons why men suffer.

If your son and brother go through the same, show this article to your family.

Clown.

[Reads with Ravi @readswithravi]

Arnold’s rule on complaining:

[Kabir Menon @the_psyche_lab]

Siya Goyal is innocent.
Because,
> she was 20 years old
> her parents pushed her to marry
> she refused to marry ketan but he didn't agree
> ketan used a wig
> her name is same as Maa Sita
> she is pretty 8.5/10
> she was in love
> 50 more blame shifting reasons..

If reasons like above are enough to justify murders, then 90% of Indian criminals will be out of jail. Most criminals are not born criminals. Situations make them.

But still they are imprisoned. They rot in jail. Crime is crime. Criminal is criminal. Your mental wounds and situation are not the justification to murder.

Stop whitewashing.
If you love washing, go wash clothes. Atleast, you will be useful.

[nduka omeife @ndukaomeife]

When I watched the Ecuador coach celebrate so passionately after his team's victory over Germany yesterday, I was reminded of a profound truth often associated with Napoleon Hill:

"The most powerful mastermind alliance a man will ever form is in his marriage. A woman, rightly chosen, aligned in vision, and honored in spirit, can make a man unbreakable. But a woman wrongly chosen or unaligned in purpose will drain him of vision, strip him of confidence, and sentence him to spiritual poverty.

Many men fall not because of failure in business, but because of conflict in the home. They rise with vision only to have it mocked. They speak with clarity only to have it questioned. They act with courage only to be met with resistance. This is not partnership. This is war. And a man at war with his household cannot build peace outside of it.

But when a woman supports a man's purpose, when she believes in his destiny, when she reflects his greatness before the world sees it, that woman becomes the mastermind in motion. Her energy fuels him. Her intuition sharpens him. Her peace steadies him. Her presence becomes a sanctuary. And the man with that kind of partner is dangerous to every limitation.

You must choose this alliance with wisdom. And if you are already in one, you must train it, not ignore it. Share your aim. Speak your plan. Invite her insight. Draw strength from her spirit. This is not weakness. This is wisdom. This is law."