@BMoment66 @KEEMSTAR@Kurt0411Fifa He was banned for criticizing an EA employee by mentioning his name. He did not make threatening comments, but there was name-calling. This led to his viewers sending threatening comments to this person on his Twitter. Now he's being striked for still streaming FIFA after the ban
@Vaggii @DelaGeezy2594 @RunTheFUTMarket I've stopped at Gold 3 every week and have packed Wijnaldum, 91 Lewa, 85 Nainggolan, and some usable 84s like Martinez, McGinn, and Partey. Even if you don't believe Gold 3 has the best red picks, it's safe to say that it's as good as the higher ranks at the very least.
@Nick28T Most toxic, hypocritical streamer I've seen. You shushed the guy first, so he starts shushing as well, then you quit when he ties it up 6-6 in extra time so that he doesn't get anything from the game. And yet, you call people rats for shushing.
@JarbaFifa His scarf, he can do what he wants with it. He didn't spit on their logo at one of their events. The only thing he is guilty of here is doing what we all do privately (abuse EA) on a live camera. Camera gets you banned?
@KuligMicha @Char1ieM8@R9Rai@Nick28T @EASPORTSFIFA We don't need a mechanic that guarantees 1v1 goals, but when you aim it in a direction with a 99 finishing player, it has to go in that direction. Not only did this not go in the direction, it went WAY OFF. There's nothing to side with the game on this. It's just RNG.
@realSfinxxx@Snuglez86@F2Tekkz I meant he called himself the best player in the world only this year, so only whether he qualified this year with a pay-to-win team counts. Keep up. He wasn't the best pro in FIFA 18.
@realSfinxxx@F2Tekkz You're missing the point. You need to spend money to qualify because you need a god squad. For all we know, the best player in the world is somewhere sitting at home not able to afford to spend money in this game, so he can't even qualify. This is a pay-to-qualify competition.